Balancing National Security and Privacy in Surveillance Laws: A Critical Examination of Contemporary Legal Frameworks
Keywords:
FISA Section 702, surveillance law, national security, privacy rights, Fourth Amendment, RISAA, civil liberties, foreign intelligence, warrantless surveillanceAbstract
One of the most important legal and political issues of the 21st century is the conflict between national security and privacy. Democratic governments are expanding their surveillance capabilities to combat terrorism, cyberattacks, and foreign espionage. But they run the risk of going against the constitutional freedoms that give democracy its meaning. The United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Section 702, which was reauthorized in 2024 by the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act (RISAA) and is set to expire in April 2026, is the focus of this study, which looks at how contemporary surveillance law navigates and frequently struggles with this fundamental conflict. This paper argues, based on statutory
analysis, judicial oversight mechanisms, comparative legal perspectives, and recent legislative history, that neither absolute privacy nor security can be achieved. What is achievable is a principled framework built on proportionality, judicial accountability, and transparent governance—one that refuses to treat security and liberty as mutually exclusive. In the paper's conclusion, a set of reform recommendations are made that have the potential to balance the effectiveness of intelligence with the protection of civil rights in a world that is being watched
more and more.
References
Brennan Center for Justice. (2024, April). Senate approves massive expansion of
government surveillance power. Brennan Center for Justice.
Brookings Institution. (2026, February). A key intelligence law expires in April and the
path for reauthorization is unclear. https://www.brookings.edu
Carpenter v. United States, 585 U.S. 296 (2018).
Charity & Security Network. (2025, December). Congress explores reforming the
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. https://charityandsecurity.org
Chin-Rothmann, C. (2023). Reforming Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Act for a digital landscape. Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Chauvin, N. (forthcoming). FISA Section 702: Oversight, accountability, and reform.
Tennessee Law Review.
Church Committee. (1976). Final report of the Select Committee to Study Governmental
Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities. U.S. Senate.
Congressional Research Service. (2025). FISA Section 702 and the 2024 Reforming
Intelligence and Securing America Act. CRS Report R48592. https://www.congress.gov
Court of Justice of the European Union. (2020). Data Protection Commissioner v.
Facebook Ireland Limited and Maximillian Schrems (Schrems II), C-311/18.
Electronic Privacy Information Center. (2024). FISA Section 702: Reform or sunset.
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, Pub. L. No. 95-511, 92 Stat. 1783.
General Court of the European Union. (2025). Latombe v. European Commission.
Dismissing challenge to EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework.
Gibson Dunn. (2025). U.S. cybersecurity and data privacy review and outlook – 2025.
Investigatory Powers Act 2016, c. 25 (UK).
Kuersten, A. (2024). FISA Section 702 and the 2024 Reforming Intelligence and
Securing America Act. Congressional Research Service.
Nextgov/FCW. (2026, February). Domestic surveillance fears loom over Congress debate
to renew spying power. https://www.nextgov.com
Nextgov/FCW. (2026, February). White House will hold meeting to discuss renewal of
controversial spying power. https://www.nextgov.com
Penn Center for Ethics and Rule of Law. (2024, July). After a bruising battle, FISA
Section 702 lives on. https://www.penncerl.org
Perkins Coie. (2025). Privacy and data security recap 2025—National security.
Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board. (2023). Report on the Surveillance Program
Operated Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
Protecting Americans' Data from Foreign Adversaries Act of 2024, Pub. L. No. 118-50.
Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act (RISAA), Pub. L. No. 118-49 (2024).
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April
(General Data Protection Regulation).
Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979).
The Intercept. (2026, January). Controversial warrantless spying law expiring soon and
Trump officials are silent on it. https://theintercept.com
The Regulatory Review. (2025, August). Collecting U.S. nationals' electronic data
without a warrant. https://www.theregreview.org
U.S. Department of Justice Inspector General. (2025). Report on FBI compliance with
Section 702 querying procedures.
U.S. Senate. (2023). Government Surveillance Reform Act of 2023, S.3234, 118th
Congress.
USA FREEDOM Act of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114-23, 129 Stat. 268.
USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-56, 115 Stat. 272.
Wiley Law. (2026, January). Five privacy checkpoints to start 2026.
