Security Challenges in South Asia: A Critical Analysis of India's Counterterrorism Policies

Authors

  • Maahi Sehrawat

Keywords:

Counterterrorism, Security challenges, Insurgencies, Legal framework, Radicalization, Intelligence agencies, Human rights, Institutional mechanisms

Abstract

India, located in the strategically tumultuous region of South Asia, grapples with a myriad of security challenges, particularly on the counterterrorism front. This critical analysis delves into the multifaceted nature of India's counterterrorism policies, assessing their effectiveness in addressing internal and external threats while navigating complex regional geopolitics. At the heart of India's security dilemma are diverse terror threats emanating from both domestic insurgencies and cross-border terrorism. Internal security challenges include Maoist insurgencies in Central and Eastern India, separatist movements in the northeastern states, and militant secessionism in the northern state of Jammu & Kashmir. Externally, India contends with terrorist groups operating from neighboring countries, especially Pakistan, which India accuses of sponsoring anti-Indian terrorist activities. India's counterterrorism architecture is an amalgam of legal, institutional, military, and diplomatic measures. Legally, India has instituted robust counterterrorism laws. Acts like the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and the National Investigation Agency Act empower law enforcement agencies with special rights and procedures to detain, interrogate, and prosecute
suspected terrorists. However, concerns have been raised regarding civil liberties, with critics pointing to instances of rights abuses and the potential for these laws to be used selectively. Institutionally, India has established several dedicated agencies and mechanisms. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) was created to probe terror-related cases, while the National Security
Guard (NSG) serves as a federal contingency force against terror attacks. Intelligence gathering responsibilities are shared among the Intelligence Bureau (IB), Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), and military intelligence units. Although these institutions have chalked up successes in pre-empting and responding to attacks, coordination issues, bureaucratic obstacles, and capacity limitations have occasionally hampered their efficacy. From a military standpoint, India has pursued a strategy of strengthening border security and conducting counterinsurgency operations. In particular, the Indian Army plays a significant role in managing the disputed Kashmir region, which regularly witnesses militant activities. The use of military force, though sometimes necessary, has also raised humanitarian concerns, with allegations of excessive force and human rights violations periodically surfacing. Diplomatically, India has sought to isolate Pakistan internationally by highlighting its alleged support for terrorism. India has also actively engaged with global forums like the United Nations and regional blocs, such as the South Asian Association.

References

Bhaumik, S. (2017). "Insurgent Crossfire: North-East India." Lancer Publishers.

Federation of American Scientists. (2022). "Terrorism in South Asia." Retrieved from: https:// fas.org/irp/world/india/index.html.

Ganguly, S., & Pardesi, M. S. (Eds.). (2020). "Handbook of Indian De-fence Policy: Themes, Structures and Doctrines." Routledge.

Gupta, K. R. (Ed.). (2019). "Fighting Terrorism: Strategies of Ten Countries." University of Michigan Press.

Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA). (2022). "India’s Counter-Terrorism Strategy: Evolving Patterns and Lessons." Retrieved from: https://idsa.in/issuebrief/indias- counter-terrorism-strategy-sschakravorty-081020

Jacob, H. (2016). "Line on Fire: Ceasefire Violations and India-Pakistan Escalation Dynamics." Oxford University Press.

Paul, T. V. (2014). "The Warrior State: Pakistan in the Contemporary World." Oxford University Press.

Rais, R. B. (2019). "Regional Cooperation in South Asia: A Review of Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, and Nepal (BBIN) Initiative." Regional Studies, 37(2), 85-106.

South Asian Terrorism Portal (SATP). (2023). "India Assessment 2023." Retrieved from: https://www.satp.org/satporgtp/countries/india/index.html

Tellis, A. J., Fair, C., & Medby, J. J. (2001). "Limited Conflicts Under the Nuclear Umbrella:

Indian and Pakistani Lessons from the Kargil Crisis." RAND Corporation

The Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India. (2023). "Counter Terrorism."

Retrieved from: https://www.mea.gov.in/counter-terrorism.htm

The National Investigation Agency, Ministry of Home Affairs." (2023). Annual Report. Retrieved from: https://www.nia.gov.in/annual-reports.aspx

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2013). "Responding to Terrorism: Protecting Human Rights and the Rule of Law." Retrieved from: https://www.unodc.org/ documents/terrorism/Publications/HR_and_rule_of_law/14-82931_Ebook.pdf

United Nations Security Council. (2022). "Report of the Analytical Sup-port and Sanctions Monitoring Team concerning ISIL (Da'esh), Al-Qaida and associated individuals and entities." Retrieved from: https://www.un.org/sc/suborg/en/sanctions/1267/aq_sanctions_list/ procedures-for-conducting-its-work

Published

2024-05-28