Legality of Apps Ban in India

Authors

  • Sanskar dubey BBALLB

Keywords:

Apps Ban, it act, constitution, Article 19(1), Section 69A

Abstract

During the Border dispute on the India China border, the Indian government with consultation with
The Ministry of Information and Technology had taken an action against the Chinese apps that are
illegally transmitting Indian uses of personal data so the Government of India banned 59 Chinese
applications. To preserve the Integrity, Security and sovereignty of the country these decisions with
regard to banning of apps were taken. Article 19(1) (a) of the Indian Constitution states about the
Freedom of Speech and expressions. This gives the right to the public at large to express their
opinions on any sociological topic at any public platform. The Ministry of Information technology
doesn’t disclose any such information which is directly or indirectly related to the ban and which is
also beyond the limit of reasoning set in the press release. The apps ban was majorly targeted to save
the country’s user data of these apps considering the national security as these apps were found in
transferring the users’ data. Government has power to ban any intermediary if such intermediary is
against the Public order, Security of State etc. As per Section 69A a power to Central Government or
other authority to issue some direction for blocking of any information via computer resources. The
apps ban of these Chinese apps by the government is to protect the national security of the country by
stopping these apps from sharing the personal important Information of the Indian user with China so
that they can use it. This ban is important as today data is the most important and precious thing. At
the time of the India China border issue this even became more important. Also this action of
Government will come under the umbrella of public order which is purely justified. Also, India today
also lacks a proper law governing and protecting data privacy.

References

All citizens shall have the right (a) to freedom of speech and expression

Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966

Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Manubhai D. Shah, AIR 1993 SC 171

Union of India v. Motion Pictures Association, AIR 1999 SC 2334

Rikke Frank Jørgensen & Lumi Zuleta, Private Governance of Freedom of Expression on Social

Media Platforms, Nordicom Review, (page-63)

Neshapriyan M, Social Media And Freedom of Speech And Expression, (Last visited on

10.2021), https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-426-social-media-and-freedom-of-

speech-and-expression.html

Constitution of India, 1950

AIR 1986 SC 180.

Maneka Ghandhi v. UOI, 1978 AIR 597.

Unstarred Question No. 1769 ‘Ban on Mobile Apps’, Lok Sabha, September 21., 2020

http://164.100.24.220/loksabhaquestions/annex/174/AU1769.pdf (last accessed on 29.10.2021, at

:30 hrs) Also see: ‘MEITY answers questions on app ban in Lok Sabha without mentioning

China’, Aditi Agrawal, Medianama, September 21, 2020

https://www.medianama.com/2020/09/223-meityparliament-china-app-ban/ (last accessed on

10.2021, at 15:30 hrs)

Unstarred Question No. 614 ‘Data Theft’, Lok Sabha, September 12, 2020,

http://164.100.24.220/loksabhaquestions/annex/174/AU614.pdf (last accessed on 28.10.2021, at

:30 hrs)

Madras High Court lifts Ban on Tiktok’, The Economic Times, April 24, 2020,https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/madras-high-court-lifts-ban-

ontiktok/articleshow/69027422.cms (last accessed on 23.10.2021, at 16:00 hrs)

‘China's Byte Dance to store Indian data locally after MPs raise concerns on privacy, national

security’, The Economic Times, July 22, 2019,https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/chinasbytedance-to-store-indian-data-locally-after-mps-raise-concerns-on-privacy-nationalsecurity/articleshow/70317330.cms?from=mdr (last

accessed on 29.10.2021, at 15:30 hrs)

‘PUBG Mobile India ban: Bombay High Court directs Centre to take action’, The Hindustan

Times, April 30, 2020, https://tech.hindustantimes.com/tech/news/pubg-mobile-india-ban-

bombay-high-courtdirects-centre-to-take-action-story-Lnvx3IYPDu1EMkfaSohdqJ.html (last

accessed on 23.10.2021, at 19:45 hrs)

Please see: https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/technology/mumbai-police-

karnatakagovernment-caught-using-banned-chinese-app-5491331.html (last accessed on

10.2021, at 20:30 hrs)

Information Technology Act, 2000

Ibid

WP(C). NO. 19716 OF 2019 (L)

Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India, Writ Petition (Civil) NO. 1031 OF 2019

Ibid

Shreya Singhal vs U.O.I, (2013) 12 S.C.C. 73

‘Panel on Personal Data Protection Bill to Submit Report in Parliament’s Winter Session’,

Livemint September 23, 2020 https://www.livemint.com/news/india/panel-on-personal-data-

protection-billto-submit-report-in-parliament-s-winter-session-11600867886634.html (last

accessed on 23.10.2021, at 15:30 hrs)

‘Govt Lens on Fintech cos with China Links’, Livemint, September 22, 2020,

https://www.livemint.com/companies/news/govt-lens-on-fintech-cos-with-china-

links11600733213636.html (last accessed on 25.10.2021, at 21:30 hrs)

Published

2022-04-02