Understanding the Concept of Usufructuary Mortgage in Indian Society

Authors

  • Avinash Kumar Student, National University of Study and Research in Law, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India

Keywords:

Usufructuary, mortgage, informal credit market, Rural credit market

Abstract

A country like India, where society is close-knit, a dominance of the informal credit market is seen. Its market is far from perfect, transactions in goods and services are often done in so-called interlinked contracts. The rural-agrarian society of India, in their time of need, arising due to a natural calamity (drought, flood, etc.) or a family emergency (weddings, funerals or life-threatening diseases), tend towards mortgaging their land to get cash. In many of such circumstances, the moneylender does not charge any direct interest over the principal loan amount, instead, he receives a piece of immovable property, mostly agricultural lands, along with the right to cultivate such land and the profit earned acts as an indirect interest over the loan amount.

References

1. Kaushi Basu . The Emergence of Isolation and Interlinkage in Rural Markets, 35 Oxford ECO 262, 262-63 (1983).

2. M. Abdullah Shibli . Usufructuary Mortgages in Rural South Asian Economies: Collateral Valuation and Internal Rates, 52 American ECO & SOCIO J. 167, 168 (1993).

3. Clive Bell and Magnus Hatlebakk, Usufructuary Mortgages as a Source of Funds in Need: Some Theory and an Empirical I nvestigation, CHR. Michelsen Institute (2017), https://www.cmi.no/ publications/6266-usufructuary-mortgages-as-a-source-of-funds-in

4. Shyamkrishna Balganesh, Codifying the Common Law of Property in India: Crystallization and Standardization as Strategies of Constraint, 63 American J. COMP. Law 33, 68 (2015).

5. Santley v Wilde, [1899] 2 CH 474.

6. R.K. Sinha, the Transfer of Property Act 278-279 (12ed, Central Law Agency 2019).

7. Rashbehary Ghosh, the Law of Mortgage in India 3 (1877).

8. Supra note 9 at 4.

9. Supra note 8 at 277.

10. Supra note 9 at 219.

11. Monappa Naika v Land Tribunal Puttur, AIR 2012 Karn. 161 (India).

12. Supra note 9 at 219.

13. Supra note 8 at 296.

14. Lachhman v Naina, AIR 1940 Lah. 401 (India).

15. Visvalinga v Palaniappa, (1898) ILR 21 Mad. 1 (India).

16. Ram Narain Singh v Adindra Nath, AIR 1916 PC 119 (India).

17. Bhandaru Ram v Sukh Ram, (2010) SCC OnLine HP 3928 (India).

18. Supra note 8 at 296.

19. Mohamad Saeed v Abdul Alim, AIR 1947 Lah. 401 (India).

20. Subarayya v Subramanyan, AIR 1952 Mad. 856 (India).

21. Supra note 8 at 296.

22. Udayan Pillai v Senthivelu, (1896) ILR 19 Mad. 411 (India).

23. Girwar Singh v Thakur Narain, (1887) ILR 14 Cal. 730 (India).

24. Supra note 8 at 295.

25. Bachan Singh v Waryan Singh, AIR 1961 Punj. 477 (India).

26. Indu v Manimala, AIR 1955 Pat. 505 (India).

27. Akbar v Mafijuddin, AIR 1942 Cal. 55 (India).

28. Isaq Hussain v Sahu Chedda, AIR 1949 All. 312 (India).

29. Manilal v Motibhai, (1911) ILR 35 Bom. 288 (India).

30. Feroz Shah v Sohbat Khan, AIR 1933 PC 178 (India).

31. Ram Adhar Singh v Bansi, AIR 1987 SC 987 (India).

32. Ram Udhar v Hari Chand, AIR 1958 Punj. 140 (India).

33. Supra note 8 at 295.

34. Raja Pertab Bahadur v Gajadhar, (1902) 24 All. 521 (India).

35. Sadashiv v Vyankatrao, (1896) ILR 20 Bom. 296 (India).

36. Supra note 8 at 296.

37. Hikmatulla v Imam Ali, (1890) 12 All. 203 (India).

38. Supra note 8 at 296.

39. Supra note 8 at 336.

40. Id at pp331-332.

41. Achaldas Durgaji Oswal v Ramvilas Gangabisan Head, AIR 2003 S.C. 1017 (India)

42. Bhandaru Ram v Sukh Lal, AIR 2012 HP 1 (India).

43. Singh Ram v Sheo Ram, (2014) 9 SCC 185 (India).

44. Vasanthamma v Siddaveerappa, AIR 2011 Kar 54 (India).

Published

2021-06-10

Issue

Section

Transfer of Property Act, 1882