Takeover Dynamics in India: A Study of Regulatory Developments and Market Impact
Abstract
This article tracks the takeover laws dynamics and implementation in India, concerning the registered regulatory changes and their implications for the market and its stakeholders. Based on the above, the SEBI regulations 2011 on Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers were developed to counter violations of shareholders’ rights or lack of transparency in the takeover process. At the same time, the present article emphasizes the launch of a hostile takeover and more than one firewall case, for instance, Larsen an, L&T infrastructure, construction and Toubro acquire, and Adani NDTS, which specifically reveal the challenges and complexity of the particular transaction. The overall measure of analysis of the acquisition of company Mindtree by L&T and Adani acquiring New Delhi Television Limited has a significant meaning in terms of corporate governance, mergers and acquisitions and
consequent changes in the market, and stakeholders’ interests. Therefore, transparent strategies and considerations need to be particularly set in implementation. Given the current state of emblem dynamics, the study answers questions that closely relate to prospects for corporate control in the evolving Indian economy.
References
Rastogi A. Hostile takeover in India: A study covering statutory and regulatory background, cases, and defenses. LinkedIn. 2023. Available at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/hostile-takeover-india-study-covering-statutory-cases-ayush-rastogi
Kumar A, Singh R. Hostile takeovers in India: Status, defenses, and legality of such defenses. SSRN. 2023. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4893085
Arora MK, Lal S, Mishra S, Singh B. Case study of cross-border insolvency of Indian realestate companies. Nat J Real Est Law. 2024;7(1):9–12.
Arora, MK, Lal S, Raghav A, Mishra S. The legal implications of corporate borrowing and analysing the framework for debt financing and its impact on real estate sector in India. Nat J Real Est Law. 2024;7(2):1–4.
Dari S, Choudhary N. Takeover code vis-a-vis corporate restructuring: a comparative study of India, USA, UK, and Singapore. Russ Law J. 2022;10(2):19–22.
International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR). Hostile takeovers in India: An overview of regulatory frameworks and market implications. IJFMR. 2023. Available at https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2023/6/9951.pdf
Law Teacher. Hostile takeovers regulations: An analysis of the legal framework in India. Law Teacher. 2023. Available at https://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/business-law/hostile-takeovers-regulations-business-law-essay.php
Singh P, Sharma R. The impact of hostile takeovers on corporate governance in India: an empirical study. J Busin Eth. 2021;164(2):345–58.
Gupta S, Mehta A. Hostile takeovers and shareholder rights in India: a critical analysis of the SEBI Takeover Code. Ind J Corp Law. 2020;8(1):45–62.
Arora MK, Lal S, Raghav A, Mishra S. The legal implications of corporate borrowing and analysing the framework for debt financing and its impact on real estate sector in India. Nat J Real Est Law. 2024;7(2):1–4.
Rao K, Verma T. Understanding the dynamics of hostile takeovers in India: trends and challenges. Int J Busin Manag. 2019;14(4):12–25.
Bansal R, Jain S. The role of regulatory frameworks in hostile takeovers: evidence from India. Asia J Busin Eth. 2018;7(1):23–40.
Joshi M, Iyer S. Mergers and acquisitions in India: a study on hostile takeover attempts and their outcomes. J Ind Busin Res. 2017;9(3):210–25.
Kapoor N, Singh V. Corporate governance implications of hostile takeovers in India: an analysis of recent cases. Corp Govern Int J Busin Soc. 2016;16(5):893–906.
Sharma A, Gupta R. The evolution of takeover regulations in India: from liberalization to the present day. J Fin Reg Compl. 2015;23(4):321–35.
Choudhury N, Dasgupta S. Hostile takeovers and their impact on corporate performance: evidence from Indian firms. J Corp Fin. 2014;28(1):123–35.
Mukherjee C, Saha D. The strategic use of poison pills in hostile takeovers: lessons from Indian companies. Int J Law Manag. 2013;55(6):497–511.
Bhattacharya U, Daouk H. The effect of takeover regulations on market performance: evidence from India’s SEBI Takeover Code reforms. J Fin Econ. 2012;105(1):54–70.
Singhvi L, Agarwal R. Hostile takeovers in India: legal challenges and strategic responses by target firms. J Busin Law. 2011;13(2):145–62.
Kaur R, Gupta P. Analyzing the effectiveness of the SEBI Takeover Code in preventing hostile takeovers in India: a critical perspective. Ind J Corp Govern. 2010;3(1):45–60.
Narayanaswamy R, Rajan S. The role of institutional investors in hostile takeover bids: evidence from Indian markets. J Fin Markets. 2009;12(3):344–67.
Arora MK, Lal S, Singh B, Olyaee M. Through an Energy Lens: Examining SDGs From a Policy Perspective. In: AI Applications for Clean Energy and Sustainability. IGI Global. 2024. pp. 320–343.
Reddy K, Prasad A. Corporate control and the regulatory framework for hostile takeovers in India: an overview and future directions. South Asia J Busin Stud. 2008;1(1):34–50.
Singh B, Kaunert C, Riswandi BA, Arora MK, Lal S. Medical Tourism and Health Gateways in International Health Market Places: Stimulating Sustainability and Technological Advancements. In: Intersections of Law and Computational Intelligence in Health Governance. IGI Global. 2024. pp. 174–196.
Sharma P, Kumar V. Hostile takeovers in emerging markets: the case of India’s corporate landscape post-liberalization. Emerg Mark Rev. 2007;8(4):291–314.
