BROADENING THE APPLICABILITY OF RERA: A CASE STUDY OF LAVASA CORPORATION LTD V. MANJU NARENDRA JOSHI & ORS.

Authors

  • siddharth jain Institute of Law, Nirma University, Ahmedabad

Keywords:

RERA, Agreement, accountability, consumers, sale

Abstract

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 was enacted with an intent to protect the interest of the investors whilst striving to bring in professionalism, standardization and accountability in the real estate sector. With the view of upholding the intent of the Act and achieving the said objectives, the High Court of Bombay in the case of Lavasa Corporation Ltd v. Manju Narendra Joshi & Ors. has substantially answered the question as to whether the provisions of RERA are applicable to an Agreement to Lease.

The paramount objective of the Act is to ensure utmost accountability towards the consumers and to provide speedy, comprehensive and effective remedies to them. This need was felt by the Parliament, as it was noticed that the consumers were not given possession for years at a stretch, and also that their money was locked in such projects. To ensure that the same is not repeated, the Bombay High Court in the present case, ruled in the favor of the Respondents and held that the intention of the Appellants was to put this project for sale, and therefore it will be bound by the provisions of RERA.

 

 

References

1. Preamble, The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

2. 2018 (08) SML BOM 82.

3. Section 2(zk). The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

4. Section 2(zn). The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

5. Section 18. The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

6. 1988 (172) ITR 311.

7. R.K. Palshikar (HUF) v. CIT, M.P., Nagpur and Bhandara, 1988 (172) ITR NJREL (2018) 38-43 © Law Journals 2018. All Rights Reserved Page 43 311.

8. Section 115. Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

9. (1992) 1 SCC 335.

10. R.S. Raghunath v. State of Karnataka, (1992) 1 SCC 335.

11. Section 18. The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

12. AIR 2017 SCC OnLine Bom. 9302.

13. Neelkamal Realtors Suburban PVT. Ltd. and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors., AIR 2017 SCC OnLine Bom. 9302.

14. AIR 2000 5 SCC 346.

15. Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd. v. State of Bihar and Anr. AIR 2000 5 SCC 346.

16. AIR 1987 3 SCC 279.

17. Utkal Contractors & Joinery (P) Ltd. v. State of Orissa. AIR 1987 3 SCC 279.

18. (2009) 15 SCC 275.

19. K.N. Farms Industries Private Limited v. State of Bihar and Others, (2009) 15 SCC 275.

20. Section 3. The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

21. Section 4. The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. Cite this Article Siddharth Jain. Broadening the Applicability of RERA: A Case Study of Lavasa Corporation Ltd. v. Manju Narendra Joshi & Ors. National Journal of Real Estate Law. 2018; 1(1): 38–43p.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-02

Issue

Section

Transfer of Property Act, 1882