Navigating the Nexus of Creativity and Imitation: IP Conundrums in Video Game Cloning Under Copyright
Keywords:
Game Cloning, Audiovisual Works, U.S. IP Regime, Distributive Classification, IP Protection StrategiesAbstract
“Such enormous growth in the video game industry throws tremendous legal challenges, especially about copyright protection. The nuances of copyright law applied to video games is, therefore, a topic followed in two sections by the legal frameworks prevalent in India and the United States. Video games, as with any other form of art, may comprise audiovisual elements, such as plot, characters, scenarios, etc., and underlying software, both of which may come under certain heads of copyright. There is protection for individual components of game works in India's distributive classification system, but U.S. law provides greater and more uniform copyright protections. The paper examines key doctrines-the "idea-expression dichotomy," the "merger doctrine," and "scène à faire"-that are used to distinguish protectable and unprotectable elements when game cloning occurs. Finally, it
explores the economic and creative effects brought about by game cloning and proposes appropriate legal and technological steps that could be taken by game developers to protect their rights. From the comparative perspective, this research work discusses the challenges and solutions available for video game content protection in a fast-paced age of digital progress.”
References
“Chip Law Group-Pramod Chintalapoodi, The Role of IP in the Gaming Industry: From Copyright Protection to Patent Wars, LEXOLOGY (2024), https://www.lexology.com/library/ detail.aspx?g=996bfdec-3735-42d8-8cc9-d7734fb55f37 (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
“Chadha & Chadha Intellectual Property Law Firm - Vrinda Sehgal, Status of Copyright Protection for Video Games in India, Lexology (2021), https://www.lexology.com/library/detail. aspx?g=19946c7c-c158-4a9b-9486-abfe84c94f69 (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
Section 14 of Indian Copyright Act, 1957.
“Alin Speriusi-Vlad, Understanding IP: About Moral Rights and Economic Effects, SSRN Electronic Journal 3–5 (2014). (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
“J.A.L. Sterling, Background and Basic Principles, in World Copyright Law 279 (3 ed. 2009).”
Ibid.
“Mayank Rautela, Video Game: An Audio Visual Protection or a Software Protection, SSRN Electronic Journal (2016). (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
“Mac Sihigh, The game's the thing: properties, priorities and perceptions in the video games industries, Research Handbook on IP in Media and Entertainment 2–4 (2017). (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”.
“Hristina R. Georgieva, Legal Protection of Videogames, SSRN, Feb 9, (2020), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3166951. (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
Ibid.
“Andy Ramos, The Legal Status of Video Games: Comparative Analysis in National Approaches, WIPO 44–48 (2013). (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
Mattel Inc. and ors. v. Jayant Agarwalla 2008 (153) DLT 548.
Sony Computer Entertainment v. Harmeet Singh 2012(51) PTC.
“Andrew Goldfarb, GDC 2016: PlayStation VR Price, Release Date Window Announced, IGN, (15 March 2016) < http://uk.ign.com/articles/2016/03/15/gdc-2016-playstation-vr-price-release-windowannounced>.(last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
“Dan Ackerman and Scott Stein, Motion Control Shoot-out: Xbox 360 Kinect vs PlayStation Move vs Nintendo Wii Remote Plus, CNET (4 November 2010) < http://www.cnet.com/uk/news/motioncontrol-shoot-out-xbox-360- kinect-vs-playstation-move-vs-nintendo-wii-remote-plus/>.(last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
“Kateryna Dmytrenko, Protection of Video Games by Copyright: Comparative Analysis of the US, UK and the German, CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL, (April 6 2018). (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
“TRIPS: Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of IP Rights, Apr. 15, 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, 1869 U.N.T.S. 299, 33 I.L.M. 1197 (1994), Article 10(1).”
“Chip Law Group-Pramod Chintalapoodi, The Role of IP in the Gaming Industry: From Copyright Protection to Patent Wars, LEXOLOGY (2024), https://www.lexology.com/library/ detail.aspx?g=996bfdec-3735-42d8-8cc9-d7734fb55f37 (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
Amarnath Sehgal v. UOI, 2005 (30) PTC 253.
“Manupatra, https://articles.manupatra.com/article-details/Copyright-Law-and-Video-Games (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
“Hayes Madsen, WB’s Nemesis System Patent Will Only Make Video Games Worse, SCREENRANT, (17 February 2021) <https://screenrant.com/nemesis-system-wb-patent-video-games-worse-bad/> (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
“SS Rana, Copyright in the Gaming Industry India, https://www.mondaq.com/india/ copyright/879888/copyright-in-the-gaming-industry (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
“Rich M, Machine Learning, Automated Suspicion Algorithms, and the Fourth Amendment, 164 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 871, 886, (2016). (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
“Chris Wallace, The Orcish Patent: How do video game patents work, and should you be protecting your ideas? MCVUK, (2021) <https://www.mcvuk.com/business-news/the-orcish-patent-how-do-video-game-patents-work- and-should-you-be-protecting-your-ideas/>.(last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
“Scott Seeley, Warner Brothers Patents Shadow of Mordor’s Nemesis System, EASTGATE IP, (2021) < https://www.eastgateip.com/warner-brothers-patents-shadow-of-mordors-nemesis-system/>.(last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
“Ben Kuchera, Patents on video game mechanics to strangle innovation, ARS TECHNICA, (3 September 2008) < https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2008/03/patents-on-video-game-mechanics-may-strangle-innovation/>. (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
Sony Computer Entertainment v. Harmeet Singh 2012(51) PTC
Sporta Technologies Pvt. Ltd. And Anr. v Dreamz11 And Anr..
“Sherveen Uduwana, A History of Video Game Patents in 5 Famous Examples, VICE, (1 March 2021) <https://www.vice.com/en/article/k7a99a/a-history-of-video-game-patents-in-5-famous-examples>. (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
“Wood Rhys, ‘Warner Bros.’ Nemesis Patent Is Terrible for the Games Industry - Here’s Why’, TECHRADAR, (13 February 2021) <https://www.techradar.com/news/warner-bros-nemesis-patent-is-terrible-for-the-games-industry-heres-why>.(last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
“Tracey Tang, Why Unauthorized Reskinned Games Constitute Copyright Infringement Under China Copyright Law, Lexology (Dec. 2, 2019), https://www.lexology.com/library/ detail.aspx?g=bd215186-ccab-41e1-b480- 58b90a85cfa6. (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
“Zihao Li, The Copyright Protection of Video Games from Reskinning in China—A Comparative Study on UK, US, and China Approaches, 11 Tsinghua China L. REV. 293, 329 (2019). (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
“Yin Harn Lee, Making Videogame History: Videogame Preservation and Copyright Law, Interactive Entertainment Law Review 103 (2018) 1. (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
“Péter Mezei and István Harkai, End-User Flexibilities in Digital Copyright Law – an Empirical Analysis of End-User License Agreements, INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT LAW REVIEW 1, (2022). (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
“Chadha & Chadha Intellectual Property Law Firm - Vrinda Sehgal, Status of Copyright Protection for Video Games in India, Lexology (2021), https://www.lexology.com/library/ detail.aspx?g=19946c7c-c158-4a9b-9486-abfe84c94f69 (last visited Sep 30, 2024). (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
17 U.S.C. § 505.
Bryant v. Media Right Prods., 603 F.3d 135 (2nd Cir. 2010).
“Copyright In The Gaming Industry - Copyright - Intellectual Property - India, https://www.mondaq.com/india/copyright/879888/copyright-in-the-gaming-industry (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
“Emanuele Fava, Hyper-Casual Simulation Video Games May Not Be Original Enough to Enjoy Copyright Protection but Game Cloning Could Still Be Prevented by Relying on Unfair Competition: Voodoo v Rollic Games and Hero Games, 43 EIPR 402 (2021). (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
“Ty Roush, Sherlock Holmes Enters the Public Domain – Here Are The Other Works Free To Use in 2023, FORBES (Jan. 1,2023). (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
“Mark Watson, 6Waves and Spry Fox settle out of court, GAMESINDUSTRY.BIZ (Oct. 12, 2012). (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
SpryFox, LLC v. LolApps, Inc. case no. C12-147RAJ(WD WA 2012).
“Mark Watson, 6Waves and Spry Fox settle out of court, GAMESINDUSTRY.BIZ (Oct. 12, 2012). (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
MiTek Holdings, Inc. v. Arce Engineering Co., 864 F. Supp. 1568 (S.D. Fla. 1994).
“The lacuna in the Indian copyright law vis-a-vis video games , NLUJ LAW REVIEW, (Jun. 3, 2020), http://nlujlawreview.in/intellectual-property-law/the-lacuna-in-the-indian-copyright-law-vis-a-vis-video-games/ (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
Atari, Inc. v. North American Philips Consumer Electronics Corp., 672 F.2d 607 (1982).
Ibid.
“Zihao Li, The Copyright Protection of Video Games from Reskinning in China—A Comparative Study on UK, US, and China Approaches, 11 TSINGHUA CHINA L. REV. 293, 314 (2019). (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
Atari’s Asteroid and Amusement World’s Meteors of North American Philips Consumer Electronics Corp 672 F.2d 607 (1982).
“Kincsö Izsak and others, Opportunities and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence Technologies for the Cultural and Creative Sectors, SMART 2019/0024 30, (2022).https://op.europa.eu/ en/publication-detail/- /publication/359880c1-a4dc-11ec-83e1-01aa75ed71a1/language-en. (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
Tetris Holding LLC v. Xio Interactive, Inc., 863 F.Supp.2d 394 (D.N.J. 2012).
Ibid.
“Mark Brown, US Judge Declares Tetris Clone “Infringing,” Wired, https://www.wired.com/story/tetris-clone-ruling/ (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
Case C-355/12 Nintendo Co Ltd and Others v PC Box Srl and 9Net Srl [2014] CJEU ECLI:EU:C:2014:25 [23]
OG Int’l, Ltd. v. Ubisoft Entertainment, No. C 11-04980 CRB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)
“Mike Rose, Court Denies Ubisoft Restraining Order Over Get Up and Dance, Game Developer (Dec. 6, 2011).”
“Andy Ramos et. al., The Legal Status of Video Games: Comparative Analysis in National Approaches, WIPO 27-28, (July 29, 2013), https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/ copyright/en/activities/pdf/comparative_analysis_on_video_games.pdf. (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
“David Greenspan and others, Mastering the Game: Business and Legal Issues for Video Game Developers - A Training Tool, WIPO 93–94. (2022). (last visited Sep 30, 2024).”
