Law of Public Nuisance for Environment Protection in India: A Critique through Judicial Interpretation
Keywords:
Public Nuisance, Environment, Protection, India.Abstract
Environment helps to sustain human life on this earth. It is the air we breathe, water we drink and the food we eat. Pollution can take many forms and people cannot survive outside of a healthy environment. The right to a healthy natural environment is gaining increasingly wide acceptance as a fundamental human right. Law of nuisance is the material interference with the ordinary comfort of human existence. The public nuisance covers a wide variety of minor crimes that threaten the health, morals, safety, comfort, convenience, or welfare of a community. Violators may be punished by a criminal sentence, a fine, or both. A defendant may also be required to remove a nuisance or to pay the costs of removal. Public nuisance is the nuisance to all in common and comprises of small crimes which cause injury to health and life. It is an unreasonable, unwarranted or unlawful interference with a right common to the general public. A person injured by a nuisance can recover damages in an action at law for tort. Similarly, damages can also be recovered for injury resulting from the legal use of a property, if such use substantially damages the property of another. The remedies of modern environmental torts have been applied in the common law principles of nuisance, negligence, strict liability and trespass and other remedies for tort and the Indian judiciary in various cases of environmental damage violating people’s right to clean and healthy environment.
References
1. The Tort of Nuisance, available at: https://blog.ipleaders.in/the-tort-of-nuisance/ (Last accessed on May 15, 2021).
2. Types Nuisance and Its Remedies, available at: https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/types-nuisance- remedies.html (Last accessed on May 15, 2021).
3. Nuisance, available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuisance (Last accessed on May 15, 2021).
4. Ushaben vs. Bhagyalaxmi Chitra Mandir, AIR 1978 Guj 13.
5. K.D. Gaur, The Textbook on Indian Penal Code, p. 68 (Universal law Publishing, Delhi, 6th Edn., 2016).
6. Harnandan Lal vs. Rampalak Mahato, AIR 1939 Pat 460.
7. Hari Singh Gaur, Penal Law of India, Vol. 1, p. 174, (Law Publishers India Pvt. Ltd., Allahabad, 11th Edn., 1988).
8. Supra Note 7, at p. 487.
9. Supra Note 7, at p. 490.
10. K.N. Chandrasekharan, R.V. Kelkar’s Criminal Procedure, p. 800 (Eastern Book Company, Lucknow, 6th Edn., 2016).
11. Govind Singh vs. Shanti Sarup, (1979) SCR (1) 806.
12. Rakesh Kumar vs. State of U.P., (1994) Cri. L.J. 289.
13. Supra Note 12, at p. 804.
14. Ibid., at p. 805.
15. Nagarjuna Paper Mills Ltd. vs. S.D.M. & R.D. Officer, Sangareddy, (1987) Cr.L.J. 2071).
16. Supra Note 12, at pp. 805-806.
17. Ibid., at p. 811.
18. Ibid., at pp. 811-812.
19. Kushumkumaree Debee vs. Hemalinee Debee, (1933) 63 Cal 11.
20. C.K. Takwani , Civil Procedure with Limitation Act, 1963, p. 458 ((Eastern Book Company, Lucknow, 8th Edn., 2017).
21. R.K. Bangia, Law of Torts including Compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act and Consumer Protection Laws, p. 182 (Allahabad Law Agency, Allahabad, Edn., 2017).
22. Supra Note 4.
23. Private Nuisance, available at: https://lawshelf.com/videos/entry/tort-law-the-rules-of-private- nuisance (Last accessed on May 15, 2021).
24. Radhey Shyam vs. Gur Prasad, AIR 1978 All 86.
25. J.C. Galstaun vs. Dunia Lal Seal, (1905) 9 CWN 612.
26. Ram Lal vs. Mustafabad Oil and Cotton Ginning, AIR 1968 P&H 399.
27. Municipal Council, Ratlam vs. Vardhichand, AIR 1980 SC 1622.
28. Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra vs. State of U.P., (1985) 2 SCC 431.
29. M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India, AIR 1988 SC 1115.
30. Himmath Singh vs. Bhagwan, (1988) Cri LJ 614.
31. Krishna Panicker vs. Appukuttan Nair, (1993) 1 KLJ 725, see also of Madhya Pradesh vs. Kedia Leather and Liquor Ltd., (2003) 7 SCC 389.
32. Vineet Kumar Mathur vs. Union of India, (1996) 7 SCC 714.
33. M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India, (1997) 2 SCC 353.
34. K. Ramakrishnan vs. State of Kerala, AIR 1999 Ker 385.
35. M.C. Mehta vs. Kamal Nath and Ors., AIR 2002 SC 1515.
36. Murli S. Deora vs. Union of India, AIR 2002 SC 40.
37. State of M.P. vs. Kedia Leather & Liquor Ltd. and Ors., AIR 2003 SC 3236.
38. Krishna Gopal vs. the State of M.P. (M.Cr.C. No. 1046/2016).
