Questioning The Quality of Services in Cameroon And Its Implications On The Consumers: An Evaluation under The Cameroonian Law
Keywords:
consumers, consumer protection, products, manufacturer, service, service provider and defect.Abstract
Consumer protection is an essential aspect of citizen’s life in the nation, thus most state is directly involved in the protection of their citizens from defective product through the enactment of consumer protection law. The Cameroon society is plagued with poor quality services on a daily basis thus questioning the quality of such services is an obvious reality with regards to its implication on consumers. Nevertheless, consumers are protected by numerous legislations, but most consumers are ignorant about this and even when aware of the protection under the legal system they are reluctant to take necessary measures to protect their rights. In Cameroon, consumers are protected by numerous enactments such as the OHADA Uniform Act Relating to General Commercial law, the 2011 consumer protection law, 2006 Advertisement law, the 1990 law relating commercial activities repeal by 2015 law on commercial activities with the aim at modernizing the mechanisms put in place for the supervision of commercial activity in the state. Also, consumers are covered by rules of contract law and the rules of liability under negligence with regards to English law, liability under criminal law, the penal code, and the new criminal procedure code. Therefore, the laws protecting consumers in Cameroon is scattered and depends on the colonial heritage of the country. With the enactment of the 2011 law on consumer protection in Cameroon, it is not still very certain whether other rules applicable to consumer protection mostly in the Anglophone part of the territory are still applicable. This and other inconvenience have made most consumers not to seek redress from the courts with respect to defective products. Thus, it is very common to find consumer rights been infringe and no redress obtained especially with regards to the provision of services. This article articulates the weaknesses of the protection of consumers against poor quality services in Cameroon most especially with the absence of a comprehensive and harmonized legislation in the domain of consumer protection. Most essentially, the article aims at evaluating the multiplicity of the laws of consumer protection before and after the enactment of the 2011 consumer protection law in Cameroon.
References
1. Manual on consumer protection, 2016 available at www.unctad.org accessed on the 01/04/2021.
2. Boma AL. Consumer protection: a Cameroon perspective in Revue Africaine Des Scienc Juridiquse Vol. 8, No. 2 (2011) pp. 47-62 at pp. 49-50.
3. Samgena D. Gelega . Strict Liability for Defective Products in Cameroon? Some illuminating lessons from Abroad. Journal of African Law. 48, 3 (2004) pp.239 – 267 at pp. 254.
4. Boma AL. Consumer Vulnerability to product Advertising and Legal Control in Nigeria (2012) Vol. 18 No. 1, The Nigerian Journal of Contemporary law. University of Lagos, Akoka, Nigeria, pp. 116–183.
5. Section 2 of the 2011 consumer protection law. Also, Section 19 of the 1990 as repealed by the 2015 law on commercial activity in Cameroon and Section 2 of law No. 2010/02 of December 2010 on electronic commerce in Cameroon.
6. Article 1386(6) of the Civil Code.
7. Samgena D. Gelega in the Wilderness at the dawn of the Millennium: the untold truth about Cameroonian consumers and the global challenge. African journal o f international and cooperative laws. London p.319.
8. Article 1386(4) of the civil code. Article 1641 and 1643 of the same code have equally considered a defect as a vice which may or may not be hidden and the vice must render the product unfit for its intended purpose.
9. Samgena D. Gelega op cit p. 319
10. The treaty on the Harmonization of business Law in Africa (OHADA), done at Port Louis on the 17 October 1993, as amended by the treaty of Quebec city October 17, 2008. The preamble of the treaty provides” the c ontractual parties to the treaty on the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa […] aware that it is essential that the rights be expeditiously, under conditions ensuring legal certainty of economic activities, in order to promote their development and to encourage investment.
11. Law No. 2015 of December 21, 2015 governing the commercial activity in Cameroon designated thereafter “law of December 21, 2015”.
12. Joseph Emmanuel Yayi Lipem, (2016) the balance between the parties in Law No 2015/018 of December 21, 2015 governing the commercial activity in Cameroon, juridical tribune, vol 6, Issue 2, p 348 to 375
13. S 11 state as follows: subject to the provisions of any written law and in particular of this section… (a) the common law; (b) the doctrine of equity; and ( c) the statutes of general application which were in force in England on the first day of January 1900, shall insofar as the legislature of the southern Cameroons is for the time being competent to law, be in force within the jurisdiction of the court.
14. Philip Kotler, (1964), market mix decisions for new products. Publish by SAGE Journals.
15. Sagamy. I Nigeria Law of spectrum law series Ibadand.2000 P. 489. Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co. Ltd Vs Selfridge Ltd.
16. (1990) suit no. HCB/15/90 (unreported).
17. (1932) UKHL 100, SC (HL) 31, AC 562.
18. The case of an Egbe Maureen Arrey V Ruth Eyoung, Elfou Cameroon, SONARA & SCDP & Anor Suit No. HCK/11/94, unreported.
19. Samgena D. Galega . Compensation for victims of defective products in Anglophone Cameroon .
20. Erle C.J, in the case of Scott London &St. Katherine’s Dock (1865)159 B.R.465.
21. Suit No. HCK/II.94, unreported
22. Charles E. Carpenter, the doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitur, the university of Chicago Law Review, P 519 to 535.
23. Article 1625 of the Cameroon civil code
24. Article 1626 of the Cameroon civil code.
25. Article 1641 of the Cameroon civil code.
26. Under Article 1625, 1626 and 1641 of the Cameroon civil code.
27. Article 1383 of the Cameroon civil code.
28. Article 1384 of the Cameroon civil code.
29. J. W. Neyer (2005). the theory of Vicarious Liability. Alberta Law Review. P 1 to 41
30. Section 38 of the 2011 consumer protection law.
31. Section 1(2) of the 2011 consumer protection law.
32. Section 11 of the 2011 consumer protection law.
33. Section 32 (1) 2011 consumer protection law.
34. Section 10 (2) 2011 consumer protection law.
35. Egute M.A, Principles of Product Liability Law in Cameroon Published by lead publishers, 2018. Pp. 150-151.
36. Section 27(1)-(4) of the 2011 consumer protection law.
37. Quality progress (200 ), corrective vs preventive action, available at www. Asq.org accessed on the 2 of February 2021.
38. Section 27 (4) of the 2011 consumer protection law.
39. (Section 31(3) of the 2011 consumer protection law makes provision for such friendly measures like replacement and repairs).
40. Section 31(1) 2011 consumer protection law
41. (Section 30 of the 2011 consumer protection law. (The Cameroon Penal Code equally frowned at producers of defective products by providing punishment and sanctions. This can be seen in its provision of section 258. Also, very important are the provisions of sections 74.
42. Section 258 (1) of the Cameroonian penal code.
43. Section 258 (2) of the Cameroonian penal code.
44. [1939]1ALL ER 578.
45. Egute M.A, Principles of Product Liability Law in Cameroon, [Lead Publishers, 2018], pp.42)
46. Yaounde court of instance: Amana Marie Louise c/societe AES -SONEL, ordonnance No. 474/C du 15 September 2009; Eyenga Joseph Cerin c societe AES -SONEL, ordonnance No. 613/C du 03 Decembre 2009; Nkono Boyomo c societe AES -SONEL, ordo nnance No. 29/C du 09 Juin 2009.
47. Suit Noo. HCK/33/AP/2021. Undecided)
48. Egute M.A opt. cit
