JURISPRUDENTIAL ANALYSIS OF DEFAMATION IN TORT LAW: AN ANGLO INDIAN PERSPECTIVE

Authors

  • Manu Krishna S.K Assistant Professor, Kerala Law Academy Law College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala.

Keywords:

Defamation, Libel, Slander, Freedom of Speech, Indian Constitutional Law, English Property and Personal Rights, Judicial Remedies

Abstract

This article comparatively examines the tort of defamation in English common law and Indian law, focusing on reputation as an interest connected with dignity, personal liberty and social standing. It discusses the principal elements of civil defamation, the reference to the claimant and publication, the historical distinction between libel and slander, and the principal defences of truth, honest opinion and privilege. It also considers the constitutional relationship between freedom of expression and reputation, including Articles 19(1)(a), 19(2) and 21 of the Constitution of India and Articles 8 and 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights as applied in England and Wales. Finally, it evaluates damages and injunctive relief, with attention to the challenges created by contemporary digital communications.

References

1. Gatley on Libel and Slander. (13th ed., with relevant supplements). Sweet & Maxwell.

2. Ratanlal, & Dhirajlal. The Law of Torts (29th ed., 2023). LexisNexis.

3. Clerk & Lindsell. Clerk & Lindsell on Torts. Sweet & Maxwell.

4. Winfield and Jolowicz. Tort Law. Sweet & Maxwell.

5. Legislation and Constitutional Materials

6. Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, S. 356.

7. Constitution of India, Arts. 19(1)(a), 19(2), 21, 105(2) and 194(2).

8. Defamation Act 2013 (England and Wales), Ss. 1–4 and 14.

9. Human Rights Act 1998 (UK), sch. 1, Arts. 8 and 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

10. Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay v. Dilipkumar Raghavendranath Nadkarni, (1983) 1 SCC 124.

11. Bonnard v. Perryman, [1891] 2 Ch 269.

12. Capital and Counties Bank v. George Henty & Sons (1882) LR 7 App Cas 741.

13. E. Hulton & Co. v. Jones, [1910] AC 20.

14. G. Narasimhan v. T.V. Chokkappa, (1972) 2 SCC 680.

15. Horrocks v. Lowe, [1975] AC 135.

16. Jameel v. Dow Jones & Co Inc, [2005] EWCA Civ 75.

17. Knupffer v. London Express Newspaper Ltd., [1944] AC 116.

18. Lachaux v. Independent Print Ltd., [2019] UKSC 27.

19. London Artists Ltd v. Littler, [1969] 2 QB 375.

20. Parvathi v. Mannar, (1884) ILR 8 Mad 175.

21. Pfeifer v. Austria, (2007) 48 EHRR 175.

22. R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu, (1994) 6 SCC 632.

23. Ratcliffe v. Evans, [1892] 2 QB 524.

24. Re S (A Child), [2004] UKHL 47.

25. Reynolds v. Times Newspapers Ltd., [1999] UKHL 45; [2001] 2 AC 127.

26. Rookes v. Barnard, [1964] AC 1129.

27. Sim v. Stretch, [1936] 2 All ER 1237.

28. South Indian Railway Co. v. Ramakrishna, (1890) ILR 13 Mad 34. [Verify the party name and report citation against the original report before publication.]

29. Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India, (2016) 7 SCC 221.

30. Tej Kiran Jain v. N. Sanjiva Reddy, (1970) 2 SCC 272.

31. Theaker v. Richardson, [1962] 1 WLR 151.

32. T.V. Ramasubba Iyer v. A.M.A. Mohideen, AIR 1972 Mad 398.

33. Vicars v. Wilcocks, (1806) 8 East 1.

34. Watt v. Longsdon, [1930] 1 KB 130.

35. Wennhak v. Morgan, (1888) 20 QBD 635.

Published

2026-10-23