From Driver to Algorithm: Re-Examining Tort Liability for Self-Driving Cars
Keywords:
Autonomous vehicles, United States, European union, traditional principlesAbstract
The development and deployment of autonomous vehicles (AVs) present one of the most complex challenges for contemporary tort law. Traditional principles of negligence and product liability, designed around the paradigm of human-operated vehicles, are fundamentally disrupted when the driving function is transferred from a human operator to an algorithmic system. This article critically re-examines the tort liability framework applicable to self-driving cars, evaluating the adequacy of existing legal doctrines in allocating responsibility for accidents involving autonomous vehicles. Through a comparative analysis of legal approaches in the United States, the European Union, and the United Kingdom, this paper explores the doctrinal challenges posed by AVs, including the identification of the responsible party, the standard of care applicable to autonomous systems, the role of product liability in addressing design and software defects, and the potential for strict liability frameworks. The
article further considers the implications of algorithmic decision-making for moral and legal accountability, including the ethical dilemmas embedded in AV programming and the challenges of proving causation in complex autonomous systems. The analysis concludes with recommendations for a reformed tort liability framework that ensures adequate compensation for victims, promotes safety innovation, and provides legal certainty for manufacturers, operators, and users of autonomous vehicles.
References
1. American Law Institute. Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability. American Law Institute Publishers; 1998.
2. Calo R. Robotics and the lessons of cyberlaw. Calif Law Rev. 2015 Jun 1;103(3):513–63.
3. European Commission. Revised Product Liability Directive. Off J Eur Union. 2024.
4. Geistfeld MA. A roadmap for autonomous vehicles: state tort liability, automobile insurance, and federal safety regulation. Calif Law Rev. 2017 Dec 1;105(6):1611–94.
5. Lin P. Why ethics matters for autonomous cars. In: Maurer M, Gerdes JC, Lenz B, Winner H, editors. Autonomous driving: Technical, legal and social aspects. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2016 May 22. p. 69–85.
6. Marchetti B. Liability for autonomous vehicles: Current frameworks and future directions. Eur J Risk Regul. 2022;13(1):88–105.
7. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Framework for automated driving system safety. 2022.
8. Dobbs DB, Keeton RE, Keeton WP, Owen DG. Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts. West Publishing Company; 1984.
9. On-Road Automated Driving (ORAD) Committee. Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles. SAE international; 2021.
10. Scherer MU. Regulating artificial intelligence systems: Risks, challenges, competencies, and strategies. Harv. JL & Tech.. 2015;29:353.
11. Selbst AD. Negligence and AI’s human users. B U Law Rev. 2020;100(4):1315–76.
12. Selbst AD, Barocas S. The intuitive appeal of explainable machines. Fordham Law Review. 2018;87(3):1085–1139.
13. Vladeck DC. Machines without principals: Liability rules and artificial intelligence. Washington Law Review. 2014;89(1):117–150.
14. Gurney JK. Sue my car not me: Products liability and accidents involving autonomous vehicles. Univ Ill J Law Technol Policy. 2013;2013(2):247–277.
15. Collingwood L. Privacy implications and liability issues of autonomous vehicles. Inf Commun Technol Law. 2017;26(1):32–45.
16. Gorani S. Enhancing Environmental Protection through Ecocide Recognition: Aligning International Criminal Law with SDG 15. National Journal of Environmental Law. 2026 Jan 13;9(1):1-6.
17. Gorani S. Intergenerational Climate Justice: Legal and Ethical Frameworks for Protecting Future Generations' Environmental Rights. Journal of Constitutional Law and Jurisprudence. 2026 Mar 2;9(1).
18. Gorani S. Cybercrime and Forensic Psychology: An Intersectional Analysis. National Journal of Criminal Law. 2026 Feb 7;9(1).
19. Singh B, Gorani S. Exploring Health Science and Global Legal Provisions. Indian Journal of Health and Medical Law. 2026 Mar 2;9(1).
