A Case Study of the International Arbitration Case Between Mexico and the United States in the Field of Environmental Issues
Keywords:
Environmental arbitration, international environmental law, pollution of common waters, principle of nonharm, common natural resources, settlement of international disputesAbstract
As an effective legal tool, environmental arbitration plays an important role in resolving international disputes related to environmental issues. One prominent example in this area is the international arbitration case between Mexico and the United States over the pollution of shared water resources, particularly the Rio Grande River. This article examines the environmental challenges caused by industrial and agricultural activities in both countries and their effects on the quality of natural
resources. In this case, Mexico claimed that the United States violated principles of international environmental law, including the principle of nonharm, and that it should accept responsibility for the consequences of the pollution of shared waters. This research shows that international arbitration, as an impartial mechanism, has been able to resolve complex disputes between two countries and help strengthen environmental legal frameworks at the international level. The results of this research show that the strengthening of environmental arbitration and the development of international legal frameworks can help resolve disputes related to climate change and common natural resources more effectively.
References
Patricia W, Birnie B, Alan E, Redgwell C. International Law and the Environment. Oxford University Press; 2009.
Brauch MD. Environmental arbitration and its role in international disputes. J Environ Law. 2011;23(2):155178.
Jackson T. Environmental governance and arbitration: the case of Rio Grande. J Lat Am Stud. 2007;39(3):445470.
Sands P, Peel J. Principles of international environmental law. Cambridge University Press; 2012.
Schrijver N. The Evolution of Sustainable Development in International Law: Inception, Meaning and Status. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 2008.
Jackson T. Environmental arbitration in the Mexico–US border disputes. J Lat Am Stud. 2007;39(3):445470.
Jackson T. Environmental arbitration and its role in resolving transboundary water disputes. J Int Water Law. 2007;25(3):345370.
McCaffrey SC. The Law of International Watercourses: NonNavigational Uses. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2007.
Problem in U.S.Mexico Relations. J Environ Law Policy. 5(2), 123149.
Mumme S. The IBWC and transboundary water dispute resolution. J Int Water Policy. 2001;15(1):85102.
Mumme S. US–Mexico water relations and the role of environmental arbitration. J Environ Confl Resol. 2003;12(3):275295.
Brauch MD. Environmental arbitration and international disputes: a case study of the Rio Grande. J Environ Law. 2011;23(2):155178.
Cordonier Segger M, Khalfan A. Sustainable Development Law: Principles, Practices, and Prospects. Oxford University Press; 2004.
Jackson T. Environmental arbitration and water resource disputes. Int J Water Res Devel. 2007;39(3):445470.
McCaffrey SC. The Law of International Watercourses. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2007.
Brauch MD. Environmental arbitration in the Mexico–US dispute. J Environ Law. 2011;23(2):155178.
Dupuy PM, Viñuales JE. International Environmental Law. 2nd ed.
Ghaeminasab F. Challenges of international arbitral awards. CIFILE J Int Law. 2024;5(10):65–85. doi: 10.30489/cifj.2024.420839.1090
Hunter D, Salzman J, Zaelke D. International Environmental Law and Policy. 5th ed. New York: Foundation Press; 2015.
