Closing the Gender Gap: Strengthening Maternity Leave and Introducing Comprehensive Paternity Leave in India
Abstract
In India, gender equality in the workplace continues to be a critical issue, with a pronounced gap in workforce participation and career advancement between men and women. One of the key contributing factors to this disparity is the inadequate support for both maternity and paternity leave. This paper examines the potential of strengthening maternity leave policies and introducing
comprehensive paternity leave as crucial steps toward closing the gender gap in India. While the Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Act of 2017 has extended maternity leave to 26 weeks, its benefits are unevenly distributed, especially in unorganized sectors, where women still struggle with job security during and after maternity. Moreover, the absence of robust paternity leave policies places the burden of childcare disproportionately on women, perpetuating gender stereotypes and limiting women’s career growth. Introducing a more equitable paternity leave policy is crucial in redistributing parental responsibilities and supporting gender equality in both domestic and professional spheres. This study explores the potential societal, economic, and cultural impacts of such reforms, drawing insights from countries with established parental leave policies, such as Sweden and Norway. It argues that closing the gender gap in India requires not just maternity support but also a broader framework that includes men in caregiving roles, fostering a more inclusive environment for women to return to the workforce and pursue leadership positions. By
advocating for comprehensive parental leave policies, this paper aims to spark dialogue around policy reforms that can lead to long-term changes in gender dynamics, ensuring a more equitable and supportive work environment for all.
References
Earle A, Raub A, Sprague A, Heymann J. Progress towards gender equality in paid parental leave: an analysis of legislation in 193 countries from 1995–2022. Commun Work Family. 2023;1–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2023.2226809
MA L, et al. ‘Fathers’ uptake of parental leave: forerunners and laggards in Sweden, 1993–2010. J Soc Pol. 2020;49(2):361–81. doi:10.1017/S0047279419000230.
Nikore M. Supporting motherhood–or discouraging parenthood? A curious case of the extended maternity leave in India. South Asia@ LSE. 2017.
Singla A. Maternity Benefit Amendment Act (2017): A ‘Humble Gift’ Causing Motherhood Penalty in India. Grad Inequal Rev. 2022; n. pag.
Mahalakshmi S, Santhiya K. Maternity benefits in India: a comparative analysis with selected countries. Int J Sci Res. 2023;12(5):2080–6.
Stoneman T. International economic law, gender equality, and paternity leave: can the WTO be utilized to balance the division of care labor worldwide? Emory Int’l L. Rev. 2017;32:51.
Moss P, Deven F. Leave policies in challenging times: reviewing the decade 2004–2014. Commun Work Family. 2015;18(2):137–44.
Singh S. The Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Bill, 2016: a critical analysis. Space Culture India. 2016;4(2):22–8.
Farré L. Parental leave policies and gender equality: a survey of the literature. Stud Appl Econ. 2016;34(1):45–60.
Rubery J, Koukiadaki A. Closing the gender pay gap: a review of the issues, policy mechanisms and international evidence. ILO Res Rep. 2016.
Dex S, Joshi H. Careers and motherhood: policies for compatibility. Cambridge J Econ. 1999;23(5):641–59.
Yadav RC. Overcoming misbalance of gender in family is creating godly grace facilitating universal women social welfare policies including maternity leave. Int J Clin Stud Med Case Rep. 2023: n. pag.
Gethe RK, Pandey A. Impact of Maternity Benefits Act, 1961 [Amendment 2017] on job employment of working mothers in India. Int J Law Manag. 2023;65(5):373–404.
Valdimarsdóttir FR. Nordic experiences with parental leave and its impact on equality between women and men. 2006.
