Employees State Insurance Act, 1948
Keywords:
Bengal Immunity, Employees State Insurance, Court of India, Supreme Court of India, Bengal Immunity Co. Ltd. v.Abstract
A piece of law known as the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 (ESI Act) offers social security benefits to workers in India's organised sector. The act provides for a range of benefits, including medical care, cash benefits in the case of illness, maternity benefits, and pensions. The act applies to all establishments employing 10 or more persons and requires employers to contribute a portion of the wages paid to their employees towards the ESI fund. The Employees' State Insurance Corporation is in charge of carrying out the act's requirements and disbursing benefits to qualified employees. Numerous significant court cases involving the ESI Act throughout the years have influenced how the law is applied and interpreted. These court cases have provided clarity on several key provisions of the act, including the coverage of the act, the definition of an "establishment," and the definition of an "employee." The court cases have also played an important role in ensuring that the act is applied in a fair and consistent manner to all employees in the organized sector.
References
1. Employees' State Insurance Corporation, Ministry of Labor and Employment, Government of India. (2021). The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948.
2. Jayaram C. SCOPE OF SECTIONS 53 AND 61 UNDER THE EMPLOYEES'STATE INSURANCE ACT, 1948: KERALA HIGH COURT'S PIONEERING JUDGMENT. Journal of the Indian Law Institute. 1990 Apr 1;32(2):259-63.
3. Ahuja R. Minoritarian labour welfare in India: the case of the Employees’ State Insurance Act of 1948. One Hundred Years of Social Protection: The Changing Social Question in Brazil, India, China, and South Africa. 2021:157-88.
4. Hogan PT, Siu SF. Minority children and the child welfare system: An historical perspective. Social Work. 1988 Nov 1;33(6):493-8.
5. Kaletski E, Prakash N. Can elected minority representatives affect health worker visits? Evidence from India. Review of Development Economics. 2017 Feb;21(1):67-102.
6. Minocha OP. Morale and Manpower Performance in the Hindustan Steel Limited. Indian Journal of Public Administration. 1977 Apr;23(2):370-96.
7. Freeman RB. Labor regulations, unions, and social protection in develop ing countries: Market distortions or efficient institutions?. Handbook of development economics. 2010 Jan 1;5:4657-702.
8. Forastieri V. Improvement of working conditions and environment in the informal sector through safety and health measures. Geneva: International Labour Office. 1999 Jul:1-7.
9. Estevez-Abe M, Iversen T, Soskice D. Social protection and the formation of skills: A reinterpretation of the welfare state. Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. 2001;145:145-83.
10. Singh A, Purohit BM, Masih N, Kahndelwal PK. Risk factors for oral diseases among workers with and without dental insurance in a national social security scheme in I ndia. International dental journal. 2014 Apr;64(2):89-95.
