DEMYSTIFYING DEATHS –THE ROLE OF FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
Keywords:
Equivocal death , Psychological autopsy, State of mind, crime, cognitive process, challenges, technological development, investigation, police, judiciaryAbstract
With the changing nature of crime and the cognitive process of the individuals, the investigative agencies face emerging challenges where they have to catch up with new technological development rather formal investigation for demystifying evil mind. The police and judiciary are rendered clueless either over the equivocal deaths or by the defense of general exceptions of IPC contented by the persons accused of crime. At this juncture they endeavor the assistance of the sophisticated techniques in detecting the crime. Thus, a collaborative environment of medico-legal fields is mandated for inquest in an expertise way to expose the actual mind behind an anti-social incident. Thus, from forensic anthropology, forensic pathologists to forensic entomology exists. Howsoever the evidence assessed through these techniques are only corroborative rather substantive. It is the need of the hour to make a paradigm shift from due process to crime control model whereby the former views there have to be certain lines even for the detection of crime which states cannot bypass whereas latter considers that the highest goal of any state should be accurate solving of crime .Considering the interest of society due accreditation should be given to forensic psychological techniques and to the evidence assessed.
Howsoever the current paper centralizes on
- Demystifying equivocal deaths –by Psychological autopsy.
- Determination of the state of mind or mens rea of an alleged individual at the time of perpetrating an offence –as against the plea of innocence .
- Evidentiary value of the assessments of forensic psychologists.
References
1. David carter, forensic psychology a very short introduction, pg. 19, oxford university press,2010.
2. Doctrine of Mens Rea is based on the Latin maxim ‘Actus non-facit reum nisi mens sit rea’- Act and mind must both concur to constitute the crime. 1 Ratanlal & Dhirajlal, The Indian Penal code, 34th edition, lexis Nexis.
3. Forensic psychology (Rai Foundation Final) NIILM University, niilmuniversity.in>humanities.
4. Barry Rosenfeld & Steven D. Penrod ,Research methods in forensic psychology , Pg,17, John Wiley& sons ,Inc. ,Hoboken, new Jersey publications.
5. Curt R.Bartol ,Anne M.Bartol , Introduction to forensic psychology research and application ,5th editi on, sage publication.
6. Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology-American psychological association, (Jan.07.2013), http://www.apa.org.practise>for.
7. Committee on ethical guidelines for forensic psychology , Appendix: specialty guidelines for forensic psy chologists – springer Link, http://link.springer.com>pdf>1.pdf .
8. CFSL-Forensic Investigation of crime and scientific services –CBI, http://www.cbi.gov.in>cfsi>about.
9. Shivarathna Lalit Vaya, Forensic psychology in India, International research journal on pol ice science ,1, issue1, IRJPS,(July 2015) ,http://www.researchngate. net>3039 .
10. P.Sampath Kumar ,Psychological autopsy: the psychological assessment of equivocal deaths , (Jan.2 ,2007) ,http://www. sriramachandra.edu.in>
11. Techniques in criminal justice (f orensic psychology (Feb.8, 2012) http://prezi.com/technique-in-crimianl- justice-forensic-psychology/...
12. Psychological autopsy a review – MedIND,medind.nic.in>jbc
13. Curt R. Bartol, Anne M. Bartol, Introduction to forensic psychology research and application ,5th edition, sage publication.pg181
14. Canter, David V, psychological autopsies - University of Huddersfield Repository, eprints.hud.ac.uk>eprint.
15. Supra at 10.
16. A.K.Shiddamshetty, N.K.Agarwal & M.S.Bhatia, Concept of psychological autopsy, 17, Delhi Psychiatrist journal, No.2, DPJ, medind.nic.in>daa.
17. Curt R.Bartol &Anne M.Bartol , Introduction to forensic psychology research and application ,5th edition, sage publication
18. Supra at 18.
19. Mental health care act, 2017, No.10, Acts of parliament, 2017(India), section 15.
20. Mental health care act, 2017, No.10, Acts of parliament, 2017(India).
21. PTI, Charge sheet based on medico -legal, forensic evidence: Delhi police on …., www.newindiaexpress.com>may14-2018.
22. Sumit Kumar Singh, Sunanda Pushkar death case: SIT relied on forensic psychological autopsy, http://www. dnaindia.com,15may-2018
23. PTI, Delhi’s burari deaths not suicide but an accident: psychological autopsy report, http://www.ndtv.com>delhis., Sep.15,2018 NJCL (2020) 1- 7 © Law Journals 2020. All Rights Reserved Page 7
24. Hemani Bhandari, A year on, Burari house fights ‘horror’ tag, www.thehindu.com, - Jan.26,2019.
25. Glanville Williams, Textbooks on criminal law, p 30, Steve& Sons, second edition, 1983.
26. The Indian penal code, 1860, No.45, Acts of parliament, 1860 (India), section 300.
27. The Indian penal code, 1860, No.45, Acts of parliament, 1860 (India) section 378.
28. PSA Pillai, criminal law, lexis Nexis, 12edition 2014.
29. The Indian penal code, 1860, No.45, Acts of parliament, 1860 (India) Section 84.
30. Bharat Kumar v state of Rajasthan, 2004 CR LJ 1958. (India)
31. State of Maharashtra v Ahmadulla, AIR 1961 SC 998. (India)
32. Nose I,Murai J &Taira M.Disclosing , concealed information on the basis of cortical activations Neuroimage, 2009;44:1380-6, pubmed.gov.g oogle scholar ,www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov..
33. Suresh Bada Math, Polygraph, narco - analysis, brain -mapping, brainfinger printing, Indian J Med Res134 July 2011, http://www.academia.edu>polygraph.
34. Guidelines on administration of lie detector test /National human rights …, nhrc.nic.in>press-release>guideline.
35. Indian Constitution .art. 20, cl.3. – No person accused of an offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself.
36. The Code of criminal procedure ,1973,No.2 , Acts of parliament,1974(India) ,section 161(2) – Such person shall be bound to answer all questions relating to the case put to him by such officer other than questions answer to which would have tendency to expose him to a criminal charge or penalty or forfeiture.
37. Sonakshi Verma, the concept of na rco- analysis in view of constitutional law and human rights, www.rmlnlu.ac. in>webj>so...
38. Selvi v state of Karnataka, (2010) 7 SCC263, Para No .205. (India)
39. Selvi v state of Karnataka, (2010) 7 SCC263. (India)
40. Sadaf Modak, what are the polygraph and narco-analysis tests PNB accused has refused ,http://www.indianexpress.com, Aug.23,2019.
41. The code of criminal procedure, 1973, No.2, Acts of parliament, 1974(India), section 164 – Recording of confessions and statements.
42. Shailender Dharma v state and another, WP (crl.) 532 of 2008 (India)
43. Nandhini Satpathy v P.L.Dani (1978)2 SCC 424,444 (India).
44. Express news service Aarushi murder case verdict: Forensic tests showed Talwars were innocent ,http://indianexpress.com, oct.13,2017.
45. The Indian evidence Act, 1872, No.1, Acts of parliament, 1872, (India) section 45 – Opinion of experts.
46. State of H.P V Jai Lal, 1999 Cr.L.J 4294 (India).
47. Main pal v state of Haryana 2004 Cr.L.J 2036 (India).
48. Curt R. Bartol &Anne M. Bartol, Introduction to forensic psychology research and application, 5th edition, sage publication, Inc.
49. Sampada Karandikar, The case of India’s missing forensic psychologists - Livemint ,http://www.livemint.com> June.18,2017. Cite this Article M.N. Kaushika. Demystifying Deaths –The Role of Forensic Psychology in Criminal Justice System . National Journal of Criminal Law. 2020; 3(1): 1- 7p.
