The Workmen's right to strike under Industrial Disputes Act,1947

Authors

  • KAUSHIKA M.N The Tamilnadu Dr.Ambedkar law university , school of excellence in law

Keywords:

Legality, illegality, strike, requirements, restraints, labour class

Abstract

The labour and capital are the backbone of industry and their co-operation is essential for the wellbeing of the economy, yet capital class has an upper hand over the labour class .Thus to redress the grievances and to safeguard the interests of labour class, some democratic weapons are used by them. Strike is cessation of work to coerce or persuade the employer to accede to their demands and give them their legitimate rights. Article 19(1) (c) guarantees fundamental right to form union or association. But by no stretch this right includes right to undertake strike. Though Right to strike not elevated to the position of fundamental right under Indian constitution, yet it gains a statutory recognition under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, as an ordinary right of social importance thus making it legal in the Indian scenario. This right is regulated by imposing reasonable restraints statutorily in order to achieve the object of harmonious relations between the workers and employers .The strikes become illegal if it is resorted to without complying with the statutory requirements. Persons resorting to illegal strikes are punishable under the Act. Thus the article deals with
Legality of strike
Justiciability of strike
Illegality of strike.
Key words: legality, illegality, strike.

References

1. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Section 2 (q).

2. Pillai KM. Labour and Industrial Laws.16th ed ition. Allahabad Law Agency.

3. Uden v Schaeffer, 110 wash 391,188 pac.395 ( 1920), courts.mrsc.org >wash reports.

4. Hannen J. American Jurisprudence.1stedn.

5. Wages during st rike period l egal interpretation – employment. www. mondaq.com/india/x/529258/employee/rig ht/labour /relations/wages/strike/period/legal/interpr etation.

6. Freedom of association and the trade union-shodhganga, shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in>bitstream.

7. All India bank employee’s association v Industrial Tribunal, ( 1961-1962] 21 FJR 63, http://www.indiankanoon.org>doc

8. Kameshwar v state of Bihar , 1962 SCR 369, http://www.indiankanoon.org>doc

9. Puri SK. Labour and Industrial Law .8th edition. Allahabad Law Agency.

10. Malhotra OP. Law of Industrial Disputes.16th edition. Lexis Nexis Butterworths Wadwa.

11. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 . Section 2(q).

12. AIR 1958 pat.51.

13. Goswami VG. Labour Industrial Laws.10th edition. Central Law Agency.

14. Backingham and Carnatic Mills v Their workmen, ( 1953) 1 LLJ 181 (SC ), http://www.indiankanoon.org>doc

15. Malhotra OP. Law of Industrial Disputes.16th edition. Lexis Nexis Butterworths Wa-Wa.

16. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.Section 2(k).

17. Goswami VG. Labour and Industrial Laws. 10th edition. Central Law Agency.

18. Model Mills ltd v Dharam Das, AIR 1958 SC 311, http://www.indiankanoon. org.doc.

19. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.Section 2(q).

20. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.Section 2(s).

21. Critique of SC’ s rul ing on the right to strike. http://indiatogether.org/combatlaw/ vol2/issue6/strike.html.

22. Pillai KM. Labour and Industrial Law.17th edition. Allahabad Law Agency.

23. Puri SK. Labour and Industrial Law .8th edition. Allahabad Law Agency.

24. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Section 2(n).

25. Mineral Miner’s Union v kendramukh Iron ore and ors, (1986) I LL J Karn, http://www.indiankanoon.org>doc.

26. Goswami VG. Labour and Industrial Law. 10th edition. Central Law Agency,

27. Central rule 71 of industrial disp utes (central rule) 1957 describes the manner.

28. Pillai KM. Labour and Industrial Law.16th edition. Allahabad Law Agency.

29. Chemical and Fibres of India Ltd v D. G. Bhoir and others, AIR 1975 SC 1660, http://www.indiankanoon.org>doc

30. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Section 2A. Dismissal etc . of an individual workman should be deemed to be an industrial dispute.

31. National Transport General Co Ltd. v Their Workman.10FJR 409,411 (LAT).

32. Chandramalai estate,Ernakulam v Its Workmen, 1960(II)LLJ 24 3 at http://www.indiankannon.org>doc

33. Legality of str ike, shodhgang a, shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in>bitstream. An Analysis of Workmen’s Right to Strike M. N. Kaushika NJLIL (2018) 13-20 © Law Journals 2018. All Rights Reserved Page 8

34. Andhra Pradesh state Road transport employees union v Andhra Pradesh 970 Lab IC 1225,12 26 (A P), http ;//www. indiankanoon.org>doc

35. Malhotra OP. Law of Industrial Disputes . 16thedn. Lexis Nexis Butterwort hs Wadwa.

36. Swadeshi Industries Limited v its workmen,1960 II LLJ 78 (SC ), http://www.indiankannon.org>doc

37. Syndicate bank and ors v umesh Nayak, AIR1995SC319http://www.indiankannon. org>doc

38. Indian general navigation railway co v their workmen, ( 1960) I LLJ .13 (SChttp://www.indiankannon.org>doc.

39. Puri SK. Labour and Industrial Law .8th edn. Allahabad Law Agency.

40. Delhi admi nistration v EdwardKeventers, AIR 1978 SC 976, http://indiankanoon. org>doc.

41. Padi PK. Labour and Industrial Law . Eastern economy edn.

42. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Section 26.

43. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Section 27.

44. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Section 28.

45. 1990 ( 2) LL J 39 ( SC), wages during strike period legal interpretation, www. mondaq.com>india wages.

46. Crompton greaves ltd v its workmen on 3 April,1978 –Indian kanoon,AIR 1978 SC 1489, http://indiankannon.org>doc Cite this Article M. N. Kaushika . An Analysis o f Workmen’s Right to Strik e under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 . National November 2018; 1(1): 13–20p.

Downloads

Published

2018-11-28