Inheritance Right of Muslim Women

Authors

  • Sheshnath Singh

Keywords:

Muslim Personal Law Inheritance Rights Gender Justice Constitutional Equality (or Articles 14 & 15) Quranic Inheritance (or Fara'id) Shariat Muslim Women

Abstract

Muslim inheritance law is one of the most formalized areas of Islamic law that establishes the distribution of a deceased person’s assets. One of its most important achievements is the recognition of women’s right to inheritance, which was a radical departure from pre-Islamic law, which kept women largely out of inheritance. This study explores the legal status of Muslim women in India through a historical account of the inheritance rights of Muslim women, an analysis of the principles of Muslim inheritance law and its relationship with the constitutional regime in India.

Doctrinal methodology is used, and the primary sources are the Holy Quran, Hadith, statutory provisions and judicial precedents with authoritativeness legal commentaries. It discusses the various classes of heirs, principles of succession and the shares allotted to daughters, wives, mothers, grandmothers, sisters under Muslim personal law. The study also examines some of the key differences between the schools of inheritance of the Sunni and the Shia, and the principles of obligatory shares, residuary succession, exclusion, and testamentary limitations.

The paper also explores the current controversy about the differential inheritance ratio between male and female heirs in the light of the principles of equality and gender justice as enshrined in the constitution. It examines the contribution made by the Indian courts to the protection of women’s rights in respect of their property rights and sheds light on some of the identified practical issues that still prevent the effective implementation of women’s rights in respect of their property rights. The study concludes that although Muslim personal law affords women legally enforceable inheritance rights, the real challenge is to bring these rights into fruition. An increase in legal awareness, better access to justice and effective implementation of available protections is crucial for Muslim women to receive their legal inheritance.

References

I. Primary Sources

• Quranic Verses

1 The Holy Quran, Surah an-Nisa (Chapter 4), Verses 7, 11, 12, and 176.

2 The Holy Quran, Surah al-Baqarah (Chapter 2), Verse 240.

• Hadith Collections

3 Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab al-Fara'id, Vol. 8, Hadith No. 724.

4 Sahih Muslim, Kitab al-Fara'id, Vol. 4

• Classical Texts

5 Al-Sirajiyya,Kitab al-Fara'id by Siraj al-Din al-Sajawandi, 14th century CE.

II. Standard Textbooks

6 D.F. Mulla, Principles of Mahomedan Law (20th ed., M.A. Mannan ed., LexisNexis Butterworths, 2013).

7 Asaf A.A. Fyzee, Outlines of Muhammadan Law (5th ed., Oxford University Press, 2008).

8 Syed Ameer Ali, Mohammedan Law, Vol. II (4th ed., Law Publishers India, 2011).

9 Faiz Badruddin Tyabji, Muslim Law: The Personal Law of Muslims in India and Pakistan (4th ed., N.M. Tripathi, 1968).

10 Paras Diwan, Muslim Law in Modern India (10th ed., Allahabad Law Agency, 2018).

III. Indian Statutes

11 The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 (Act No. XXVI of 1937).

12 The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 (Act No. 25 of 1986).

13 The Constitution of India, 1950, Arts. 14, 15, 21, 25, 26.

14 The Registration Act, 1908 (Act No. XVI of 1908).

IV. Case Laws

15 State of Bombay v. Narasu Appa Mali, AIR 1952 Bom 84.

16 Krishna Singh v. Mathura Ahir, (1980) 3 SCC 141 (Supreme Court of India).

17 Noorunnisa Begum v. Mohd. Shafi, (1974) 2 SCC 246 (Supreme Court of India).

18 Danial Latifi v. Union of India, (2001) 7 SCC 740 (Supreme Court of India).

19 Shayara Bano v. Union of India, (2017) 9 SCC 1 (Supreme Court of India, Constitutional Bench).

20 Shabnam Hashmi v. Union of India, (2014) 4 SCC 1 (Supreme Court of India).

21 Joseph Shine v. Union of India, (2018) 2 SCC 189 (Supreme Court of India, Constitutional Bench).

22 Sadiq Hussain v. Hashim Ali, (1916) 38 All. 627 (Privy Council).

23 Abul Fata Mahomed Ishak v. Russomoy Dhur Chowdhury, (1894) 22 Cal. 619 (Privy Council).

Published

2026-08-16