Dignity Without Walls: Workplace Sexual HarassmentLaw in the Age of Digital Labor

Authors

  • Shloke Sarkar

Keywords:

Workplace Sexual Harassment, Digital Labour, POSH Act, 2013, Workplace Dignity, Platform-Mediated Work, Employer Responsibility, Digital Workplace Regulation

Abstract

The digitization of work, the rise of remote work, and platform mediated professional interactions have changed the spatial and relational boundaries of the workplace in a fundamental way. The legal framework of India regarding sexual harassment at the workplace, which is based on the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013, has widened the concept of "workplace" from physical offices to various other places. However, when it comes to digital spaces, the practice of law is still disjointed, and there is less theoretical understanding of it. This research articulates the impact of changing work modes such as remote work, virtual offices, gig platforms, and digitally mediated professional networks on the assumptions underlying POSH compliance mechanisms. The study suggests that harassment in digital spaces may include the use of video conferencing platforms, instant messaging applications, emails, and algorithmic work interfaces
which can cause risks to dignity, evidence gathering, and redress that are not sufficiently addressed by the traditional policy frameworks. The paper, through a doctrinal analysis of the POSH Act, the Vishaka Guidelines, and relevant judicial developments, locates the degree to which the current law on harassment accommodates digital harassment and points out essential regulatory gaps. Further, it also considers the organizational practices and the international approaches to the problem of workplace harassment in the digital domain to employer responsibility and platform accountability. Eventually, the research states that "workplace," "employer," and "course of work" would need to be reconceptualized if one wants to maintain the dignity of the workplace in digital arenas.

References

1. Kapur R. Gender, sovereignty and the rise of a sexual security regime in international law and postcolonial India. Melb J Int Law. 2014;14(2):317.

2. Fudge J. The legal boundaries of the employment relationship. Can Labour Employ Law J. 2017;25:1.

3. Siegel RB. Dignity and the politics of protection. Yale Law J. 2012;117:1690.

4. Fredman S. Human rights transformed: Positive rights and positive duties. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.

5. Vishaka v State of Rajasthan. (1997) 6 SCC 241.

6. Fredman S. Human rights transformed: Positive rights and positive duties. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.

7. Agnes F. Law and gender inequality: The politics of women’s rights in India. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999.

8. Kapur R. Gender, alterity and human rights: Freedom in a fishbowl. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2018.

9. Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013. s 2(o).

10. Khaitan T. A theory of discrimination law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.

11. Prassl J. Humans as a service: The promise and perils of work in the gig economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018.

12. Fraser N. Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Soc Text. 1990;25:56.

13. Bernstein A. Treating sexual harassment with respect. Harv Law Rev. 1999;111:445.

14. Citron DK. Hate crimes in cyberspace. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 2014.

15. Dixit S. Internal complaints committees and due process under POSH. Indian Law Rev. 2020;5:89.

16. Deakin S, Wilkinson F. The law of the labour market. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.

Published

2026-01-27