Liabilities in Relation to Company Formation Under the OHADA Uniform Act Relating to Commercial Companies and Economic Interest Groups
Keywords:
Liability, OHADA, uniform act, company, formationAbstract
The OHADA company law strives to ensure that the rules relating to the formation of a company are scrupulously respected. If a company is not well formed it cannot function. The reason for this is aimed at protecting the interest of those who never took part in the constitution of the company. Liability of company administrators can result from mistakes which can either be international or unintentional, that can be seen through the disrespect of the rules relating to the formation of companies. The rule here is that those in charge of accomplishing the formalities of the creation of a company must ensure that no prejudice is cause to the shareholder or third party. This article examines the liabilities of persons involved in company formation under OHADA Company Law. Through content analysis of the OHADA Company law, it recognizes the civil liabilities of promoters/founders, directors, auditors and all those who are involved in the creation of a company. It also recognizes corporate criminal responsibility. In the domain of corporate criminal responsibility, the UA has assembled all the corporate offences relating of companies in one of its parts entitled “offences relating to companies” making it easier to access. However, a major difficulty is that these offences are not followed by their penalties in the same section. The acts merely state the offences and relate the punitive sanctions to the
criminal law of the member states without any harmonization of penalties. In these light penalties for offences relating to the formation of companies under OHADA law varies from one country to country. We, therefore, recommend harmonization of penalties relating to OHADA Company Law.
References
1. The relevant rules are contained principally in Articles 161 –172, 330–332, 740–743 and 886–905 of the UACC and also in the Uniform Act on Collective Proceedings for the Clearing of Debts, Articles 180–215.
2. Ekome E. Public issue of shares under the companies ordinance and the Uniform Act of the OHADA Treaty. Juridis périodique, 2002; 50: 102.
3. Takang AR. A Comparative Study of the Concept of Corporate Criminal Responsibility in the United Kingdom and Cameroon: Lessons Drawn from the UK. [Thesis]. LLM in International and European Law (PILC), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium. 2020.
4. Companies Act Integrated Ready Reckoner|Companies Act (2013). Section 89. Declaration in respect of beneficial interest in any share. ||CAIRR [Online] Available from: https://ca2013.com/declaration-in-respect-of-beneficial-interest-in-any-share/.
5. Martor S, Pilkington N, Sellers DS, Thouvenot S. Business Law in Africa, OHADA and the Harmonization Process. London, England: Kogan Page; 2002.
6. Civil Code. [Online] Available from: https://www.fd.ulisboa.pt/wp- content/uploads/2014/12/Codigo-Civil-Frances-French-Civil-Code-english-version.pdf.
7. Britton P. The Guest -plaintiff, the civil code and the Cour de cassation. International & Comparative Law Quarterly. Oct 1976; 25(4): 826–847.
8. Ibid, Article 1384.
9. Article 740(1) OHADA (Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa) 1993.
10. Article 741(1) UACC.
11. Ibid, Article 741(2).
12. Ibid, Article 741(3).
13. Article 742 UACC.
14. Article 743 UACC.
15. Article 75 UACC.
16. Article 78 UACC.
17. See Article 79 UACC.
18. Article 77 UACC.
19. Article 80 UACC.
20. Article 256(2) UACC.
21. Article 256(3) UACC.
22. See Article 242 UACC.
23. Article 330(2) UACC.
24. Article 331(1) UACC.
25. Article 331(2) UACC.
26. Article 331(3) UACC.
27. Article 331(4) UACC.
28. Article 332 UACC.
29. “L’Impact de l’Acte Uniforme de l’OHADA Relatif au Droit des Sociétés Commerciales et du GIE sur le Contrôle et le Développement des Entreprises Locales » Juridis Périodique. 66: 107–116.
30. Martor S, Pil kington N, Sellers DS, Thouvenot S. Business Law in Africa, OHADA and the Harmonization Process. London, England: Kogan Page; 2002.
31. Article 161 UACC.
32. Article 861 UACC.
33. Article 443(1) UACC.
34. Article 443(2) UACC.
35. Article 164 UACC.
36. See Article 312 of the UACC.
37. See Article 312 UACC. See also Article 409 UACC.
38. Article 725 UACC.
39. Article 726 UACC.
40. Article 727 UACC.
41. Article 165, 330 and 740 UACC.
42. Articles 166 UACC.
43. Article 167 UACC.
44. Article 168 UACC.
45. Article 170 UACC.
46. Article 171 UACC.
47. Article 175 UACC.
48. Article 776 UACC.
49. Anoukaha, F., et al. (2002), OHADA Sociétés Commerciales et GIE, Juriscope, Bruylant Bruxelles, pp. 225–306.
50. Pougoué PG, Elongo YR. Introduction critique à l’OHADA. France: Presses univresitaires d'Afr; 2008.
51. L’Impact de l’Acte Uniforme de l’OHADA Relatif au Droit des Sociétés Commerciales et du GIE Sur le Contrôle et le Développement des Entreprises Locales , Juridis Périodique. 2006; 66: 107– 116.
52. Essoh Clotilde E. The reception of OHADA law in Anglophone Cameroon: Appraisal and proposals. Uniform Law Review. May 2023: unad014. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unad014.
53. Pougoué PG, Anoukaha F, Toukam JN. Le droit des sociétés commerciales et du groupement d'intérêt économique OHADA. Presses universitaires d'Afrique; 1998.
54. Mercadal BM. Infractions aux Règles de Constitution et d’Augmentation du Fonds Socia l. Traité des Sociétés Fasc. 1253 N° 7, Cf.
55. Article 49 UACC.
56. See also Articles 51 to 25 of the UACC dealing with company shares.
57. See article 81, UACC
58. See part 3, Title 1 of the UACC.
