Combating Unfair Trade Practices: Exploring Anti-dumping Measures and Their Impact

Authors

  • Taskeen Showkat

Keywords:

Anti -dumping measures, trade regulations, economic effects, policy recommendations, legal frame work, trade disputes

Abstract

This document conducts an in-depth examination of anti-dumping measures, serving as a vital instrument for overseeing global trade and mitigating unfair practices detrimental to domestic industries. The analysis encompasses various aspects, including the legal structure, economic repercussions, obstacles, and suggested policy measures. Internationally, agreements like the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the Anti-Dumping Agreement delineate the regulations and processes governing anti-dumping actions among member nations, with additional specifications outlined in national laws to guide investigative procedures. Economically, anti-dumping measures have varied effects on domestic industries, consumer welfare, trade flows, and market dynamics. While intended to protect domestic industries, concerns arise regarding their impact on consumer prices, market competition, and global efficiency. Moreover, anti-dumping measures can provoke disputes, distortions, and uncertainties in international trade, necessitating careful consideration of their implications. Policy recommendations include enhancing transparency and due process, strengthening international cooperation, promoting economic analysis, addressing protectionist tendencies, and supporting vulnerable industries. By embracing evidence-based decision-making and advancing policy reforms, countries can navigate the complexities surrounding anti-dumping measures while fostering a more inclusive, equitable, and sustainable global trading system.

References

Blonigen BA, Prusa TJ. Antidumping. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London; 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2809-1.

Deardorff AV, Stern RM. A centennial of anti-dumping legislation and implementation: Introduction and overview. World Econ. 2005;28:633–40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2005. 00696.x.

Cheng LK, Qiu LD, Wong KP. Anti-dumping measures as a tool of protectionism: A mechanism design approach. Can J Econ. 2001;34:639–60. DOI: 10.1111/0008-4085.00092.

Conrad CA. Dumping and anti-dumping measures from a competition and allocation perspective. J World Trade. 2002;36:563–75. DOI: 10.54648/5090920.

Blonigen BA, Prusa TJ. Dumping and antidumping duties. In: Bagwell K, Staiger RW, editors. Handbook of Commercial Policy. Volume 1, Part B. Amsterdam (Netherlands): North-Holland (Elsevier); 2016. p. 107–159. DOI: 10.1016/bs.hescop.2016.04.008.

Willig RD. Economic effects of antidumping policy. In: Lawrence RZ, editor. Brookings Trade Forum. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 1996. p. 57–79.

Prusa TJ. On the spread and impact of anti-dumping. Can J Econ. 2001;34:591–611. DOI: 10.1111/0008-4085.00090.

Published

2024-03-20

How to Cite

Showkat, T. . (2024). Combating Unfair Trade Practices: Exploring Anti-dumping Measures and Their Impact. Indian Journal of Health and Medical Law, 7(2), 1–9. Retrieved from https://lawjournals.celnet.in/index.php/ijhml/article/view/1513