Carbon Taxes with Reinvestment: A Global Solution to a Global Challenge
Keywords:
Global warming, carbon tax, cap and trade, greenhouse gases, emissions, pollution and international lawAbstract
There exists a general agreement in today’s world that the environment is fast degrading and it would be in universal interest to take steps to ameliorate the situation. Though global warming occurs in innumerable ways and greenhouse gas emission is a wide problem there is no consistent global approach to tackle climate change. Carbon taxation is a method intended to internalise the negative externalities that are currently, caused by polluters with no repercussions. But there exists no agreement that carbon tax is the means to be adopted in this pursuit. The two methods that are often mooted are carbon tax and cap and trade program. Each method has its own pros and cons. The cap-and-trade program involves the limitation of carbon emissions by regulated polluters and allocation of set emission allowances among them. Trading of these allowances determines the value of allowances and creates a market among polluters. If the regulated polluters exceed the set cap, they must purchase reduction credits from other targeted polluters who do not meet their assigned limits. It shall be argued herein that carbon taxes with reinvestment addresses the shortcomings of both the approaches and it has the potential to be a global solution to global warming.
References
1. Miles Young, Beautifying the Ugly Stepsister: Designing an Effective Cap - and-Trade Program to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions , 2009 B YU L. REV. 1379 (2009). Carbon Taxes with Reinvestment Lakshana R. JTRF (2018) 23-26 © Law Journals 2018. All Rights Reserved Page 26
2. Gilbert Metcalf & David Weisbach, The Design of a Carbon Tax (John M. Olin L. & Econ., Working Paper No. 447, 2009).
3. David G. Duff, Tax Policy and Global Warming, 51 C AN. T AX J. 2063, 2065 (2003).
4. U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change, 1949 U.N.T.S. 1-30822.
5. Supra note 3.
6. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, Braz., June 3 -14, 1992, Rio Declaration Principle 16, U.N. Doc. A/CONF.151/26 (Vol. I), Annex I (Aug. 12, 1992) (The Rio Declaration is a declaration of 27 principles adopted by the UNCED and endorsed by the U.N. General Assembly. The principles of the Rio Declaration are the result of compromise between developed and developing nations.).
7. See ORG. FOR ECON. CO-OPERATION & DEV. (OECD), ECONOMIC INSTRUMENTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (1989).
8. Roberta Mann, To Tax or Not to Tax Carbon - Is That the Question? 24 N AT. RES. & ENV’T 44 (2009).
9. Florian Habermacher & Gebhard Kirchgissner, Climate Effects of Carbon Taxes, Taking into Account Possible Other Future Climate Measures 27 (CESifo, Working Paper No. 340, Cat. 10: Energy and Climate Economics, 2011).
10. Gilbert E. Metcalf et al., Analysis of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Tax Proposals (Nat'1 Bureau of Econ. Res., Working Paper No. 13980, 2008).
11. Reuven S. Avi -Yonah & David M. Uhlmann, Combating Global Climate Change: Why a Carbon Tax is a Better Response to Global Warming than Cap and Trade, 28 S TAN. E NVTL. L.J. 3, 5 (2009).
12. H.R.2454 - The American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, OPEN CONG., http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111- h2454/actions_votes (last visited on October 1, 2016).
13. Amanda Reilly & Kevin Bogardus, 7 years later, failed Waxman -Markey bill still makes waves , E&E DAILY, June 27, 2016.
14. Supra note 11.
15. See Jon Strand, Strategic Climate Policy with Offsets and Incomplete Abatement: Carbon Taxes Versus Cap -and-Trade 2-3 (The World Bank, Dev. Research Grp., Env't & Energy Team, Working Paper No. 5675, 2011).
16. Gbenga Ibikunle & Andros Gregoriou, International Emissions Trading: A Survey of Phases of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme 5 (Soc. Sci. Res. Network, Working Paper, 2011),
17. Kenneth R. Richards & Stephanie Richards, The Evolution and Anatomy of Recent Climate Change Bills in the U.S. Senate: Critique and Recommendations (Soc. Sci. Res. Network, Working Paper, 2009).
18. Erik P. Bartenhagen, The Intersection of Trade and the Environment: An Examination of the Impact of the TBT Agreement on Ecolabeling Programs , 17 VA. ENVTL. L.J. 51, 61 (1997).
19. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, Oct. 30, 1947, 61 Stat. A -11, 55 U.N.T.S. 195 [GATT].
20. GATT, at art. III: 2. Cite this Article Lakshana R . Carbon Taxes with Reinvestment: A Global Solution to a Global Challenge. Journal of Taxation and Regulatory Framework . 2018; 1( 2): 23– 26p.
