An Assessment of the Mechanisms for the Protection of Traders in International Trade Disputes

Authors

  • Lawrentine Onege Longfor

Keywords:

Mechanisms, International Trade Disputes, targeted capacity-building initiatives, World Trade Organization (WTO), specialized production

Abstract

International trade functions as a crucial engine of economic development, propelling growth, innovation, and the transnational exchange of goods and services. By enabling nations to leverage their comparative advantages through specialized production, it bolsters efficiency and fuels economic expansion. This study analyzes the safeguards available to protect traders embroiled in international trade disputes. Tracing the evolution of international trade from rudimentary bartering systems to the sophisticated architecture of the World Trade Organization (WTO), the analysis illuminates the enduring quest for a stable and efficient trading regime. Notwithstanding the WTO's endeavors, trade disputes remain prevalent, exposing the precarious position of traders in cross-border transactions. This study posits that sound protective mechanisms are indispensable, given traders' function as both
risk mitigators and facilitators of market efficiency. The research also recommends for proactive preventative measures, targeted capacity-building initiatives, and amplified collaboration among stakeholders.

References

KreshnikAliaj and Genc Mekaj, “Legal Aspects of International Trade”, ILIRIA International Review, Vol. 8, No 2 (2018), pp.171-191:171

Ibid.

Ricardo, D. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. John Murray. (1817).

Krugman, P. R. “Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade”, American Economic Review, 70(5), (1980), Pp. 950–959: 954.

Bulliet, R. W. The Earth and Its Peoples: A Global History. Houghton Mifflin. (2005). P.4

“General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT).” Available at; https://www.britannica.com/topic/General-Agreement-on-Tariffs-and-Trade (Visited on 23/12/2023)

Ibid.

Meléndez-Ortiz, R., Bellmann, C., & Hepburn, The future of trade: The challenges of convergence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (2012)

Bagwell, K., & Staiger, R. W. (2002). The Economics of the World Trading System. MIT Press.

Pomeranz, K. The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy. Princeton University Press. (2000)

Bhagwati, J. In Defense of Globalization. Oxford University Press, (2004)

Pauwelyn, J. Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law, Cambridge University Press. (2011)

Jackson, J.H. "The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations." MIT Press. (2006).

Krugman, P., & Obstfeld, M. "International Economics: Theory and Policy." Pearson. (2018).

World Trade Organization (WTO). "Understanding the WTO.", Available at; https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/doload_e/understanding_e.pdf (visited on the 05/08/2024)

World Trade Organization (WTO). "Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS)." WTO - TRIPS Agreement] (https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/27-trips_01_e.htm, Available at 05/08/2024

Cottier, Thomas et al. "The WTO and Global Trade Governance." (Cambridge University Press)

Ibid.

United Nations. (Chapter VI: Pacific Settlement of Disputes (Articles 33-38). Available at https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/ (Accessed on the 23/12/2023)

The United Nations convention on contracts for the sale of goods (CISG; the Vienna convention) is a treaty that is a uniform international sales law. It has been ratified by 91 States that account for a significant proportion of world trade, making it one of the most successful international uniform laws. The Convention for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) was developed by the United Nations commission on international trade law (UNCITRAL) and was signed in Vienna in 1980. It came into force as a multilateral treaty on 1st January 1988, after being ratified by 11 countries.

Negotiation is the preeminent mode of dispute resolution. While the two most known forms of ADR are arbitration and mediation, negotiation is almost always attempted first to resolve a dispute. Negotiation allows the parties to meet in order to settle a dispute. The main advantage of this form of dispute settlement is that it allows the parties themselves to control the process and the solution. Negotiation is much less formal than other types of ADRs and allows for a lot of flexibility.

Mediation is also an informal alternative to litigation. Mediators are individuals trained in negotiations, who bring opposing parties together and attempt to work out a settlement or agreement that both parties accept or reject. Mediation is not binding. Mediation is used for a wide gamut of case-types ranging from juvenile felonies to federal government negotiations with Native American Indian tribes. Mediation has also become a significant method for resolving disputes between investors and their stock brokers.

Conciliation is an ADR process where an independent third party, the conciliator, helps people in a dispute to identify the disputed issues, develop options, consider alternatives and try to reach an agreement. A conciliator may have professional expertise in the subject matter in dispute and will generally provide advice about the issues and options for resolution. However, a conciliator will not make a judgment or decision about the dispute. Conciliation may be voluntary, court ordered or required as part of a contract. It is often part of a court or government agency process.

Ibid.

Jethro K. Liebermant & James F. Henry, “Lessons from Alternative Dispute Resolution Movement”, The University of Chicago Law review, 1986.

The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) is the world’s single largest corporate lobby group. The Paris-based ICC was founded in 1919 and has thousands of member companies in over 130 countries. Although the organization calls itself the ‘World Business Organization’, it is clearly dominated by large transnational corporations who use the influence of the ICC to promote an international political and economic climate that is favourable to their interests.

Arbitration is less costly, privacy, convenient and faster than litigation.

Stefan Razvan Tataru, “Settlement Methods of International Trade Disputes in the Pharmaceutical Industry: A Short Legal Empirical Research”, Universitatea AlexandruIoan Cuza, Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Law, Vol. 6, Issue 1(2018), pages: 41-55. Available at https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenlaw/06.

International Chamber of Commerce: ICC, Available at https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2024/06/chambers-of-commerce-and-the-business-of-skills_de0684f4/712a9ddc-en.pdf (visited on the 12/04/2025)

Ibid.

Aceris Law, Incoterms in International Trade (2020), Available at, www.acerislaw.com/incoterms-in-international-trade/ (visited on the 12/04/2025)

Maras, Marie-Helen, Criminology, Oxford University Press., (2016).

(1988) 1 N. W. L. R. (pt. 69) 207.

Published

2025-06-30