Reopening and Review: Debate and Controversy
Keywords:
Income tax, Section 147, Reopening, Assessment, ReviewAbstract
This paper deals with the issue of reopening of a closed income tax assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act 1961. The introduction elucidates the clash between reopening proceedings and the law of limitation. It is followed by a discussion of case laws involving reopening of claims. The next section delves into the judiciary’s interpretation of reason to believe, application of mind, formation of opinion, fault theory, and review powers of the court. Major case laws are analyzed to understand the thresholds for justifying re-assessment of completed income tax matters. Further, the jurisprudence on materiality of information unearthed subsequently, commissioner’s powers to review and time restrictions are exposited. A brief overview of the nature and practice of block assessments is also provided. The conclusion draws inferences from the case law discussion and highlights that the judicial trends and legislative approach favor the protection of the rights of the assessee.
References
1. Held to be ‘intra vires the powers of the Parliament’ in Vimal Chandra Golecha 134 ITR 119 (Raj.).
2. Parshuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1977] 106 ITR 1 (SC).
3. Ganga Saran and Sons P. Ltd. v. ITO, (1981) 130 ITR 1 (SC).
4. [1991] 192 ITR 537.
5. [1999] 238 ITR 57.
6. [Civil Misc. writ Petition No. 1603 (Tax) of 2006 decided on 27.8.2010].
7. Calcutta Discount Co. Ltd. vs. ITO (1961) 41 ITR 191(SC).
8. S. Narayanappa v. CIT (1967) 63 ITR 219.
9. Asian Paints Ltd. v. DCIT & Ors., 308 ITR 195; Idea Cellular Ltd. v. DCIT, 301 ITR 407; & CIT v. Eicher Ltd., 294 ITR 310.
10. CIT& others v. Chhabil Dass Agarwal (2014) 1 SCC 603.
11. Adobe Systems Software Ireland Ltd. v. Assistant Director of Income -tax (International Taxation), Circle (1), New Delhi in the SC.
12. The Principal Officer, LG Electronics Pvt. Ltd. v. Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. Writ Tax No. 177 of 2014, Writ Tax No. 126 of 201, dated 22-4-2015.
13. ACIT & Ors. v. ICICI Securities Primary Dealership Ltd. [2012] 348 ITR 299 (SC).
14. 247 ITR 436.
15. Ram Swarup & Allied Industries v. ACIT (1991).
16. CIT v. Kelvinator of India 256 ITR 1.
17. Praful Chunilal Patel v. MJ Makwana, Asst. CIT [1999] 236 ITR 832.
18. [2009] 226 CTR 659(All.).
19. Asst. CIT v. Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers (P.) Ltd, reported in 291 ITR 500 (SC).
20. Amiya Sales & Industries v. ACIT 274 ITR 25(Cal.).
21. Bawa Abhai Singh v. DCIT [2002] 253 ITR 83.
22. CIT v. Sfil Stock Broking Ltd. reported in 325 ITR 285.
23. CIT v. The Simbhaoli sugar mills Ltd., 2011-TIOL-293-HC-DEL-IT; preceded by Indian and Eastern Newspaper Society v. CIT, New Delhi, (1979) 119 ITR 996 & CIT v. Lucas T.V.S. Ltd., (2001) 249 ITR 306.
24. 3i Infotech Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax& Others (2010) 329 ITR 257 (Bom.).
25. ITO v. Lakhmani Dewal Dass [1976] 103 ITR (SC) 437.
26. ITO vs. Selected Daluband Coal Co. (P) Ltd. (1996) 217 ITR 597 (SC).
27. DCIT v. Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Co. Ltd. Case reference against High court SCA NO. 25090/2006. Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. vs. ITO (1999) 236 ITR 34 (SC)].
28. CIT Vs Modipon Ltd., reported in 2011 - TIOL-355-HC-DEL-IT.
29. ITO v. Satya Narayan Parwal 96 ITD 362.
30. Income Tax Act 1961, S. 150 (1).
31. ACIT & Anr. v. Hotel Blue Moon CIVIL APPEAL NO.1198 OF 2010 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 22973 of 2007); also see per contra Dr. Pratap Singh vs. Director of Enforcement, [1985] 155 ILR 166 (SC).
32. Western India Baker (P) Ltd. v. ACIT 87 ITD 607 (Mum.); CIT v. Sivanandan (52 DTR) Ker. 428; followed in ACIT, Jhansi v. Vidit Kumar Agarwal IT APPEAL NO. 279 (AGRA) of 2011 C.O. No. 57 (Agra) of 2011 [ASSESSMENT YEAR 1999 - 2000] OCTOBER 12, 2012.
33. Cargo Clearing Agency (Gujarat) v. JCIT, 307 ITR 1 (Guj).
34. 288 ITR 347 (M.P.).
35. CIT v. Peer Chand Ratan Lal Baid HUF [2010] 322 ITR 544.
36. [2010] 328 ITR 515.
37. Commissioner of Income-tax v. Vrindaban JTRF (2018) 40-48 © Law Journals 2018. All Rights Reserved Page 48 Real Estate (P.) Ltd. All HC IT Appeal NOS. 486 OF 2008 AND 344, 347 & 609 of 2011 JULY 24, 2012.
38. K.G. Baliga (ITA No. 3840/Del/2003).
39. CIT v. Electro House, (1971) 82 ITR 824 (SC).
40. CIT v. Christian Mica Industries Ltd., (1979) 120 ITR 627 (Cal.).
41. Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd., (2000) 243 ITR 83 (SC).
42. CIT v. T. Narayana Pai, (1975) 98 ITR 422.
43. CIT v. Arvind Jeweller, 259 ITR 502 (Guj.).
44. Second proviso to S. 147, Income Tax Act 1961.
45. GKN Driveshaft Ltd. v. ITO & Or. Del HC.
46. Givaudan Flavours Ltd. (India) v. DCIT, reported in 2011-TIOL-195-ITAT-MUM.
47. Parixit Industries (P.) Ltd. Vs ACIT Gujarat High Court, [2012] 20 taxmann.com 750 (Guj.).
48. Denish Industries Ltd. v. ITO (2004) 271 ITR 340 (Guj).
49. Trustees of H.E.H. The Nizam ’s Supplemental Family Trust v. CIT: (2000) 159 CTR (SC) 114.
50. Asstt. CIT v. Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers (P) Ltd.: (2007) 210 CTR (SC) 30.
51. Jharkhand High Court in Kavee Enterprises 301 ITR 156 relying on SC in G.K.N Driveshaft 259 ITR 19.
52. Shanti Vijay 60 TTJ 748, R.P.Gupta & Sons 157 Taxman 158 (Mag), Santosh Gupta ITA 2361/del/2004 etc.
53. Travancore Cements Ltd. v. ACIT [2008].
54. CIT vs Associated Cement & Steel Agencies 147 ITR 776 (Bom.).
55. Sri Nath Suresh Chand Ram Naresh v. CIT [2005] 145 Taxman 186 (All.).
56. R. Kakkar Glass & Crockery House Vs. CIT (2002) 254 ITR 274 (P&H).
57. Jindal Products v. ITO (1993) 70 Taxman 111(All.).
58. KS Suresh v. Dy. CIT [2005] 279 ITR 61 (Mad.). Cite this Article Lakshana R . Reopening and Review: Debate and Controversy . Journal of Taxation and Regulatory Framework; 1(1). 40–48p.
