The Legal Battle Over the Colorado River Compact: Revisiting Water Allocation Agreements
Keywords:
Colorado River Compact, Water rights allocation, Legal disputes, Climate change impact, Interstate cooperation, Water sustainability, Agricultural water use, Urban water needs, Environmental conservation, Adaptive legal frameworksAbstract
The Colorado River provides water through seven states of the United States and to Mexico, under the Colorado River Compact of 1922, as based upon a period of time when the river was experiencing extremely high flow. Climate change and increasingly intense drought conditions have dramatically changed the hydrological nature of the river, rendering those initial allocations unsustainable, with states increasingly in litigation over their rights to water. The article puts the Colorado River Compact
within an historic and legal context, with agricultural interests pitted against urban municipality needs, and all of these against environmental interest groups. This research paper emphasizes that alterations in existing compacts, inspired by key legal cases and recent negotiations, are imperative for equitable and sustainable water management. These findings show that adaptive legal frameworks, interstate cooperation, and the embedding of scientific data into legal institutions are essential in securing longterm
viability of the Colorado River as a resource. The resolution of these issues in law would help the United States secure its water future while advancing the economic interests of its diverse regions.
References
California State Water Resources Control Board. (2022). Water Rights in California: A Guide to Riparian and Appropriative Rights. Retrieved from [https://www.waterboards.ca.gov], (https://www.waterboards.ca.gov)
Diffenbaugh, N. S., Swain, D. L., & Touma, D. (2015). Anthropogenic warming has increased drought risk in California. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(13), 3931-3936. doi:10.1073/pnas.1422385112
Hanak, E., & Lund, J. (2020). Managing California’s Water: From Conflict to Reconciliation. Public Policy Institute of California.
Hanak, E., Lund, J., Arnold, B., & Mount, J. (2019). Water Rights in California: Balancing Agriculture, Urban Development, and Ecosystem Needs. Public Policy Institute of California.
National Research Council. (2020). Delta Smelt and Water Flow: Ecological Interactions and Management Options. The National Academies Press.
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. (2022). Water Infrastructure and Agriculture: Addressing the Southwestern U.S. Water Crisis. Retrieved from [https://www.usbr.gov], (https://www.usbr.gov)
California State Water Resources Control Board. (2022). Water Rights in California: A Guide to Riparian and Appropriative Rights. Retrieved from [https://www.waterboards.ca.gov], (https://www.waterboards.ca.gov)
Fulton, J., Cooley, H., & Gleick, P. (2019). California’s Groundwater: The Challenges of Sustainability. Water Policy Institute.
Carter, N., & Smith, L. (2021). Enhancing Water-Use Efficiency in Agriculture: Policy Solutions for California’s Drought Crisis. Journal of Environmental Management, 255, 1-12.
Ghaeminasab. F. “international challenges of international arbitral awards”. CIFILE Journal of international law, 2024). 4. (10.30489cifj.2024.420839.1090)
Ghaeminasab. F. Legal Evaluation of the 1921 and 1940 treaties after the collapse of Soviet Union: A comparative analysis in treaty law, the National journal of environmental law. 2024.
