Fiscal Decentralization System and Sustainable Forest Management in Cameroon: A Myth or Reality towards Sustainable Local Development
Keywords:
Annual Forest Revenue (RFA), Taxation, Cameroon, Forestry, Local communities, Sustainable developmentAbstract
Cameroon is a major powerhouse of the Congo Basin forest-rich region of the tropical rainforest-rich Central Africa. Cameroon’s forestry sector is of great national importance as it contributes to the gross domestic product (GDP), global climate change mitigation, alleviate poverty to adjacent local communities as it serves as a source of income and livelihood, most especially through annual forest taxes (herein refers to royalties) in production forest concessions units. These royalties act as incentive for local communities to protect and managed their forests sustainably. Surprisingly, unsustainable forest management and misappropriation of these funds remain the dominant practice in the sector. Thus, Instead of benefiting adjacent local communities and promoting local development, the forest revenue has led to undermining of local and national development, connivance between certain community members and loggers to evade forest taxes, and deterioration in the relations between local councils and village communities. As a result, local communities remain poor and marginalized over what rightfully belongs to them “Tragedy of the Common”. This paper therefore, looks specifically on how the forest taxation system from industrial logging can benefit local communities and enhance sustainable local development. The paper also examines the consequences of the suppression of the 10% Annual Forestry Revenue (RFA) to adjacent local communities and concludes with some robust recommendations to establish an equalization fund to redistribute taxes from the forests to forest-rich communities that mostly depend on this forest for their livelihood.
References
1. Ewane E.B, Olome E.B and Heon-Ho Lee. Challenges to Sustainable Forest Management and Community Livelihoods Sustenance in Cameroon: Evidence from the Southern Bakundu Forest Reserve in Southwest Cameroon . Journal of Sustainable Development . Nov 2015, 8, (9), ISSN 1913 -9063 E -ISSN 1913 -9071, Canadian Center of Science and Education, P.1.
2. Karl M, Cerutti PO, Oyono PR et al. Broken Promises: Forest Revenue-Sharing in Cameroon , Washington, DC: World Resources Institute (WRI), 2009, 5p.
3. Benjamin S. Cameroonian forest-related policies: A multi- sectoral overview ofpublic policies in Cameroon’s forests since 1960 . Unpublished report part of a PhD on Tropical Forest Policies at the Institutd’Études Politiques and CIRAD, Paris. 2008, 15p.
4. Giuseppe T, Megevand C, Karsenty, A, et al. The Rainforests of Cameroon: Experience and Evidence from a Decade of Reform. Washington, DC: The World Bank Publications. 2009, 13p.
5. Karl M, Cerutti PO, Oyono PR et al. Broken Promises: Forest Revenue-Sharing in Cameroon , Washington, DC: World Resources Institute (WRI), 2009.
6. Tieguhong, Julius Chupezi . “ Sustainable Forest Management in Cameroon ”. In Search of Common Ground: Adaptive Collaborative Management in Cameroon , eds. Diaw MC, Aseh T, Prabhu R. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) . 2009, 412 - 441pp.
7. Morrison Karl, Paolo Omar Cerutti, Phil René Oyono, et al. Broken Promises: Forest Revenue -Sharing in Cameroon . Washington, DC: World Resources Institute (WRI). 2009.
8. Giuseppe T, Megevand C, Karsenty A, et al. The Rainforests of Cameroon: Experience and Evidence from a Decade of Reform. Washington, DC: The World Bank Publications.2009.
9. Fomété T. The Forestry Taxation System JTRF (2018) 1-14 © Law Journals 2018. All Rights Reserved Page 13 and the Involvement of Local Communities in Forest Management in Cameroon, Rural Development Forestry Network Paper 25b. 2001.
10. Lipietz A , et al . Economie politique des écotaxes and Fiscalité de l’environnement. Paris, France: Conseil d’Analyse Économique. 1998.
11. Anderson K. Agrawal A. Inequalities, Institutions, and Forest Commons. Global Environnemental Changes. 2011, 21: 866- 875pp.
12. Giuseppe T, Megevand C, Karsenty A, et al. The Rainforests of Cameroon: Experience and Evidence from a Decade of Reform. Washington, DC: The World Bank Publications.2009.
13. Bigombé LP. The decentralized forestry taxation system in Cameroon: Local management and state logic, Working Paper No 10 . Washington D.C.: World Resource Institute. 2003.
14. Bigombé LP. Governance of decentralized forest revenue in Central Africa: For the better or for worse, in LA German . Karsenty A, Tiani AM, eds. Governing Africa’s Forests in a Globalized World. London: Earthscan. 2010, 174-186pp.
15. Karsenty A. Economic instruments for tropical forests: The Congo Basin Case. London: Center for International Forestry Research/Centre de Cooperation Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement/ International Institutte for Environnent and Development. 2000.
16. Luc Mendouga Mebenga. La Tragédie des Mille Francs . Dimako, Cameroun: Forêts et Terroirs, Ministère de l’Environnement et des Forêts du Cameroun et Coopération Française. 2000.
17. Oyono, Phil René, Paolo Omar Cerutti, Matthew Steil . Forest Taxation in Post - 1994Cameroon: Distributional Mechanisms and Emerging Links with Poverty Alleviation and Equity. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute (WRI), 2009, 20pp.
18. MINEF. Bilan diagnostic de l’état de la biodiversité dans quelqu es UFA du Sud Cameron, MINEF, Cameron. 2002.
19. MINFOF. Projet de conservation et d’utilisation durable du foret de Ngoyla - Mintom: Analyse des dynamiques sociales et évaluation des acteurs et deleurs besoins en renforcement des capacités. Yaoundé Cameron. 2011.
20. Karsenty A, Roda JM, Milol A, et al. Audit Economique et Financier du Secteur Forestier au Cameroun . Département Forêts du CIRAD et Ministère de l'Economie et des Finances du Cameroun . 2006. 54pp.
21. Mbarga N. Étude empirique de la fiscalité forestière décentralisée au Cameroun: un levier de développement local, Hubert Montpellier, décembre. 2005, 7pp.
22. Mbeng MC. A critical appraisal of voluntary partnership agreement within the framework of FLEGT and Cameroon . Master’s thesis . Faculty of law and political sciences, Department of English Law, University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon. 2015. 25pp.
23. Cerutti PO, Lescuyer G, Assembe Mvondo S, et al. The challenges of redistributing forest -related monetary benefits: A decade of logging area fees in Cameroon. International Forestry Review. 2010, 12 (2), 130pp.
24. Nzoyem N, Sambo M, Majerowicz CH. Audit de la fiscalité décentralisée du secteur forestier camerounais. Boulogne, France, I&D , Institutions et Développement. 2003.
25. Republic of Cameroon . Document de Stratégie pour la Croissance et l’Emploi (DSCE)-Cadre de référence de l’action gouvernementale pour la période 2010 - 2020. Yaoundé, Cameroon, Republic of Cameroon. 2009.
26. MINATD, MINFI and MINFOF . Joint Arrêté No. 0520/ MINATD/MINFI/MINFOF establishing the procedure for the use of logging and hunting revenues intended for neighbouring councils and com munities. 2010.
27. Oyono P R, et al. Institutional deficit, representation, and decentralized forest management in Cameroon, Elements of natural resource sociology for social theory and public policy. Working Paper No 15: Environmental Governance in Africa Series. Washington DC: World Resource Institute. 2004.
28. World Bank (WB) . A Legal and JTRF (2018) 1-14 © Law Journals 2018. All Rights Reserved Page 14 Institutional Framework for Sustainable Management of Forest Resources in Southern Sudan: Policy Note, World Bank Publication. 2010.
29. Lipietz A , et al. Economie politique des écotaxes et fiscalité de l’environnement, Paris, France: Conseil d’Analyse Économique. 1998.
30. Dudley N, Jeanrenaud J.-P., Sullivan F. Bad Harvest: The Timber Trade and the Degradation of Global Forests. New York, USA: Earth scan. 1995.
31. Stringer C. Forest certification and changing global commodity chains. 6(5): 701-722pp.
32. Mayer P. Hot Spot: Forest policy in Europe: achievements of the MCPFE and challenges ahead. Forest Policy and Economics. 2000, 1(2): 177-185pp.
33. Wijewardana D. Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management: The road travelled and the way ahead. Ecological Indicators. 2008, 8(2): 115-122pp.
34. Putz FE, Redford KH, Robinson JG, et al. Biodiversity conservation in the context of tropical forest management . In Biodiversity Series. Washington DC, USA: Impact Studies. 2000.
35. Clark MR, Kozar JS. Comparing sustainable forest management certifications standards: A meta -analysis. Ecology and Society. 2011, 16(1).
36. Chávez AB, Cossío RE. Linking national forestry reform through forest concession policy and land cover change. Small-scale Forestry. 2013, 13(3): 349-366pp.
37. Bartley T. Transnational private regulation in practice: The limits of forest and labor standards certification in Indonesia. Business and Politics. 2010, 12(3). Cite this Article Ayuk Macbert Nkongho. Fiscal Decentralization System and Sustainable Forest Management in Cameroon: A Myth or Reality towards Sustainable Local Development. Journal of Taxation and Regulatory Framework. 2018; 1(2): 1–14p.
