Taxation Dilemma in the Gig Economy: Bridging the Gap between India and the World.
Keywords:
Taxation, Gig Economy, India, International Law, Comparative Analysis.Abstract
The emergence of the gig economy has led to a new era of work that challenges traditional employment models and raises questions about how to effectively tax these new forms of income. In India, this issue is particularly complex due to the country's unique economic and social landscape. This article explores the taxation dilemma in the gig economy, with a focus on the Indian context. I examine the challenges facing tax authorities in India as they attempt to keep pace with the rapid growth of the gig economy, and I compare these challenges to those faced by tax authorities in other parts of the world. Through this comparative analysis, I aim to identify best practices and policy solutions that can help bridge the gap between India and the world in terms of taxing the gig economy. Ultimately, my goal is to contribute to a more nuanced and informed public debate about the role of taxation in shaping the future of work in India and beyond.
References
Baldwin, R.E., 2011. 21st Century Regionalism: Filling the gap between 21st century trade and 20th century trade rules. Available at SSRN 1869845.
Commission on Social Determinants of Health, 2008. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health: final report of the commission on social determinants of health. World Health Organization.
Cohen, M. and Sundararajan, A., 2015. Self-regulation and innovation in the peer-to-peer sharing economy. U. Chi. L. Rev. Dialogue, 82, p.116.
Berg, J., 2015. Income security in the on-demand economy: Findings and policy lessons from a survey of crowdworkers. Comp. Lab. L. & Pol'y J., 37, p.543.
Yaraghi, N. and Ravi, S., 2017. The current and future state of the sharing economy. Available at SSRN 3041207.
Graham, M., Hjorth, I. and Lehdonvirta, V., 2017. Digital labour and development: impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods. Transfer: European review of labour and research, 23(2), pp.135-162.
De Stefano, V., 2015. The rise of the just-in-time workforce: On-demand work, crowdwork, and labor protection in the gig-economy. Comp. Lab. L. & Pol'y J., 37, p.471.
Gwartney, J.D., Lawson, R. and Edwards, C., 2002. Economic freedom of the world: 2002 annual report. The Fraser Institute.
Codagnone, C., Biagi, F. and Abadie, F., 2016. The passions and the interests: Unpacking the'sharing economy'. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, JRC Science for Policy Report.
Hossain, M., 2020. Sharing economy: A comprehensive literature review. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 87, p.102470.
Felländer, A., Ingram, C. and Teigland, R., 2015. Sharing economy. In Embracing Change with Caution. Näringspolitiskt Forum Rapport (Vol. 11).
Ashford, S.J., Caza, B.B. and Reid, E.M., 2018. From surviving to thriving in the gig economy: A research agenda for individuals in the new world of work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 38, pp.23-41.
Clark, T., 2020. The gig is up: An analysis of the gig-economy and an outdated worker classification system in need of reform. Seattle J. Soc. Just., 19, p.769.
Md Fadzil, F.N. and Che Azmi, A., 2022. Establishing factors affecting the tax morale of individuals working in the gig economy. Journal of Global Responsibility, 13(2), pp.157-176.
Clark, T., 2021. The Gig Is Up: An Analysis of the Gig-Economy and an Outdated Worker Classification System in Need of Reform. Seattle Journal for Social Justice, 19(3), p.25.
Leaphart, J.M., 2016. Sharing solutions: an analysis of taxing the sharing economy in the United States and Europe. Tul. L. Rev., 91, p.189.
Maozami, Y., 2016. UBER in the US and Canada: Is the Gig-Economy Exploiting or Exploring Labor and Employment Laws by Going beyond the Dichotomous Workers' Classification. U. Miami Int'l & Comp. L. Rev., 24, p.609.
