PIRACY RANSOM – AN ANALYSIS OF LEGALITY IN COMPARISON WITH MARITIME TERRORISM
Keywords:
Maritime Piracy, Maritime Terrorism, Ransom, Legality, Interna tional Law, National PoliciesAbstract
Maritime piracy is a crime under international law and is dealt with in various legal instruments; chiefs among them are Geneva Convention, 1958 and UNCLOS. Even though international community have been discussing about the menace of piracy for ransom model for many years, none of the legal instruments manifestly assert the ransom payment to be contrary to international law. The ransom ban on piracy marks its origin from the concerns over the ransom payment for terrorist hijackings. This article has attempted to review the debate over the lines of demarcation between the acts of piracy and acts of terrorism. The article first analyses in depth the concepts of maritime piracy and terrorism and then discusses how they are fundamentally different from each other, then proceeds to identify why it is illegal to make ransom payments for terrorist hijackings, but at the same time legal for pirate hijackings, owing to the silence of international legal instruments. The article further delves into the reasoning for pro-ransom contentions and practical disadvantages of ransom ban. It finally proceeds to the policies adopted by various nations in this matter and concludes by asserting that piracy ransom payments are indeed lawful.
References
1. Phillip Gosse. The History of Piracy. Tudor Publishing Company; 1934.
2. Frécon E. The resurgence of sea piracy in Southeast Asia [Occasional Paper No. 5]. Bangkok: Research Institute on Contemporary Southeast Asia; 2008.
3. UN Security Council. Monitoring Group on Somalia. Report of the Monitoring Group on Somalia Pursuant to Sec. Council Resolution 1811 ; 2008 Dec. 10. UN Doc S/2008/769.
4. UNCTAD. Part I: An Overview of trends, costs and trade-related implications; 2013 Dec. 10. UN Doc UNCTAD/DTL/TLB/ 2013/1.
5. The World Bank Regional Vice - Presidency for Africa. The Pirates of Somalia: Ending the Threat, Rebuilding a Nation; 2013. JHRLP (2020) 86–96 © Law Journals 2020. All Rights Reserved Page 96
6. UNICEF. The Situation of Women and Children in Somalia.
7. Geneva Convention on the High Seas. 1958.
8. Convention on the Law of the Sea. 1958.
9. Eurojust. Maritime Piracy Judicial Monitor; 2013.
10. A Middelburg. Piracy in a Legal Context: Prosecution of Pirates Operating off the Somali Coast. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers; 2011.
11. Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation. 1988.
12. DF Orentlicher. Universal Jurisdiction after Pinochet: Prospects and Perils. War Crimes Research Office. Washington College of Law. American University; 2003.
13. World Bank. Pirate Trails: Tracking the Illicit Financial Flows from Pirate Activities off the Horn of Africa; 2013.
14. Sofia Galani. The Human Rights and Maritime Law Implications of a Piracy Ransom Ban for International Shipping. Mar Safe Law. 2017; 3: 22-46p.
15. Ranstorp M, Wilkinson P. Terrorism and political violence. In: Terrorism and Political Violence; 2005.
16. South Asia Analysis Group. Raman B. Maritime terrorism: An Indian perspective; 2004. Paper No. 1154.
17. Birnie PW. Piracy: Past, present and future. Marine Policy. 1987; 11: 163-183p.
18. Douglas Guilfoyle. Piracy and Terrorism. In: Panos Koutrakos, Achilles Skordas. The Law and Practice of Piracy at Sea: European and International Perspectives ; 2014.
19. Lydelle Joubert. The Extent of Maritime Terrorism and Piracy: A Comparative Analysis. SAJMS. 2013; 41: 111-137p.
20. International Convention against Taking of Hostages. 1979.
21. International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism. 1999.
22. UN Security Council; 2001 Sep. 28. SC Res 1373. UN Doc S/Res/1373.
23. UN Security Council; 2014 Jan. 27. SC Res 2133. UN Doc S/Res/2133.
24. Charles Marts. Piracy Ransoms – Conflicting Perspectives. One Earth Future Foundation Working Paper; 2010.
25. Joshua Dressler. Exegesis of the Law of Duress: Justifying the Excuse and Searching for its Proper Limits. S Cal L Rev. 1989; 62: 1331, 1336p.
26. Sofia Galani. Somali Piracy and the Human Rights of Seafarers. Neth Q Hum Rights. 2016; 1: 73-77p.
27. Ben Farmer. The human cost of piracy: broken victims of violence. 2014.
28. Ken Menkhaus. Pirates in Somalia: Abduction, Negotiations. Washington Post. 2009 Apr 10 [cited 2020 Mar. 5]; Available from: http://www.washington post.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2009/ 04/10/DI2009041001303.html.
29. Masefield AG v Amlin Corporate Member Ltd. [2011] 1 WLR 2012.
30. Royal Boskalis Westminster NV v Trevor Rex Mountain [1998] 2 WLR 538.
31. United States Federal Register. Bloc king Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in Somalia; 2010. 75 FR 19869.
32. New Batch of Filipino Seafarers Seized by Somali Pirates. Xinhuanet. 2010 May 14 [cited 2019 Aug 18]; Available from: http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/w orld/2010-05/14/c_13295229.htm. Cite this Article Chithira Venugopal. Piracy Ransom – An Analysis of Legality in Comparison with Maritime Terrorism . Journal of Human Rights Law and Practice . 2020; 3(2): 86–96p.
