The Principle of "Focus on Judicial Affairs in the Judiciary" (Analysis of International Documents and Iranian Legal System)
Keywords:
Intrinsic judicial affairs; Dispute settlement; International documents; Quasi-judicial authorities; Judicial authorities; Focus on the judicial systemAbstract
The focus of judicial affairs in the judiciary, which was addressed in the fifth paragraph of the General Judicial Policy adopted in 2000, is a dilemma of the issues involved in Iran's criminal justice system in contrast to the relatively independent institutions of the judiciary. The parallelism, implementation of heterogeneous judicial policies and the ineffective influence results from the lack of concentration of judicial affairs in the judiciary and the involvement. Other forces in these matters have led to the need for pathology and provision of solutions to this problem so as to achieve a peaceful adjustment of disputes. Therefore, in this paper, the jurisprudence of criminal justice is reviewed and analyzed by assessing the concept of judicial affairs, recognizing it from similar concepts in the context of international documents, domestic law and violations of the centralization of judicial affairs in Iranian criminal justice. In this way, independent quasi-judicial authorities of the judiciary such as the Governmental Discretionary Punishments Organization and the Dispute Resolution Council have been criticized.
References
1. Sani’ee Monfared MA. The independence of powers in the provision of constitution in Islamic Republic of Iran . Journal of Islamic State. 2001; 6(4).
2. Hashemi SM. Islamic Law of the Islamic Republic of Iran , Governance and Political Bodies. Iran: Mizan Publishing; 2005.
3. Dehkhoda AA. Dictionary. Tehran: University of Tehran, School of Literature Publishing; 1943.
4. 6.Wisbert D, Frederickson B. Fair hearing. Translated by Farideh Taha and Leila Ashraghi. Tehran: Mizan Publishing; 2007.
5. Naji Zavareh M . The impartial trial in criminal affairs. Legal studies and researches of Danesh city. 2010; 1(2).
6. 10.Pasha Saleh A. A commentary on the history of Iranian law and its judicial organizations until September of 1965. 1965; 2(2).
7. Matin Daftary A. Code of civil and commercial hearing. Tehran. 1962. Vol. 1, No.3.
8. Heydari Farsani A . Guarantee system evaluation of the enforcement of rape crimes and the performance of the provincial criminal court in dealing with the case . [Master’s Thesis] Tarbiat Modares University. 2009.
9. Al-Musawi al -Khomeini R. Tahrir al - Wasilah. Dar al-Kotob al-Elmeyah, Najaf, Iraq. 2011. No.2.
10. Salahi J . Semi-judicial proprietary authorities. Tehran. Jungle Publi shing. 2010; 1(4): 266–267.
11. Mohaghegh Damad SM . Rules of Jurisprudence (Criminal Section). Islamic Science Publishing Center . Iran, 2000; 8(3): 7.
12. Janipour A . Private criminal courts (An analysis of international documents and Iranian legal system ). [Doctoral Thesis] University of Tehran. 2013.
13. Fazayeli M . 2010. Fair hearing of international cr iminal trials . Institute for Legal Studies and Research es of Dahesh City, Vol.2, No.2.
14. Roger Merle et Andre vitu. (1967). Traite de droit criminal. Paris, Cujas Edition. No. 1107. The Principle of "Focus on Judicial Affairs in the Judiciary Haghi et al. JHRLP (2020) 30 –45 © Law Journals 2020. All Rights Reserved Page 45
15. Trechsel S. 2005 . Human rights in criminal proceeding . Oxford University Press. Vol.1, No.2, p. 56.
16. Malary V Haiti. (2002). Para. 53.
17. Decision No 40/1993/ (Djibouti) (29 September 1993 ), UN document E/CN.4/1994/27.
18. H.R.C, General Comment/32, Para. 48.
19. H.R.C, Communication no. 230 (1987), Henry v. Jamaica, Para. 8.4.
20. H.R.C, General Comment/32.Para. 45. Cite this Article Eisa Haghi, H ossein Ahmadi, Hassan Shariati. The Principle of "Focus on Judicial Affairs in the Judiciary" (Analysis of International Documents and Iranian Legal System). Journal of Human Rights Law and Practice. 2020; 3(2): 30–45p.
