The Protection of Women during Armed Conflict: Crossing Legal Borders in the Application of International Humanitarian Law, Human Right Law and International Criminal Law
The Protection- Women -Armed Conflict-Crossing Legal Borders -Application International Humanitarian Law-Human Right Law- International Criminal Law
Keywords:
The Protection- Women -Armed Conflict-Crossing Legal Borders -Application International Humanitarian Law-Human Right Law- International Criminal LawAbstract
Women as a minority group are understandably and predictably strongly affected by armed conflict. This negative experience becomes very precarious for these women in situations where they are highly affected from the abuse and traumas emanating from the outcome of war especially those countries plague by the disaster of armed conflict. As a preliminary remark, it should be acknowledged that while the effects of armed conflict are not always discernible and quantifiable in women, they remain present and multi-dimensional to such an extent that it would be extremely ambitious for any legal or normative framework to pretend to tackle them holistically. For these women affected by armed conflicts, the risk of abuse and exploitation almost mathematically increases. In that sense, the quality of the experiences does not differ from other persons involved in armed conflict. This suffering experienced by women has saw the need of some legal framework protection and laws ranging from international humanitarian law, human righ, and to an extend the necessity of international criminal law in ensuring that these special group of persons should be given maximum protection in aspect of crises and turbulence. The objective of this paper is in examining the the role and place of international humanitarian law, human right law and even criminal law in the protection and treatment of women in armed conflict. That the absent of one does not automatically mean the failure of the other since both laws has to complement each other for a better protection. In order in arriving at a safe and effective protection of these women who suffered from the adverse effect of armed conflict, it is worthy in noting that though these laws varies from each other depending on the circumstances of protection, human right law is applicable at all times whether during armed or non-armed conflict. The continuous increase of abuses, rape, exploitation and even violations of women rights during armed conflict creates a vivid image in the mind of the international community and even the legal field as a whole as to the efficiency and effective protection of women in armed conflict. The main question addressed, through the comparative study of the three legal frameworks, will concern the compatibility and complementarities of the three regimes but also their responsiveness and adequacy for current humanitarian crises. Do the three regimes award similar or contradictory rights? Do they result in the creation of legal gaps? Or do they simply follow radically different orientations?
References
1. S.C. Res. 1325 (2000), U.N. Doc.S/RES/1325 (Oct. 31, 2000), paras 9 and 16.
2. For the discussion within the U.N. Security Council see its documents S/PRST/2001/31 (Oct. 31, 2001); S/2002/1154 (Oct. 16, 2002); S/PRST/2002/32 (Oct. 31, 2002); S/2004/814 (Oct. 13, 2004); S/PRST/2004/40 (Oct. 2 8, 2004); S/PRST/2005/52 (Oct. 27, 2005); S/PRST/2006/42 (Nov. 8, 2006), S/PRST/2007/5 (March 7, 2007). JHRLP (2019) 17–26 © Law Journals 2019. All Rights Reserved Page 25
3. Charlotte Lindsey, Women Facing War, ICRC Study on the Impact of Armed Conflict on Women (2001); ICRC, Addressing the Needs of Women Affected by Armed C onflict: An ICRC Guidance Document (2004).
4. Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Guidelines for Gender -based Violence in Humanitarian Settings, focusing on the Prevention of and Response to Sexual Violence in Emergencies, available at www.humanitarianinfo.org/iasc/content/su bsidi/tfgender/gbv.asp#feedback (last visited April 26, 2007).
5. Charlotte Lindsey, The Impact of Armed Conflict on Women , in Listening to the Silences: Women and War 35 (Helen Durham & Tracey Gurd eds., 2005) [hereinafter Lindsey 2005]; Report of the Secretary-General on Women, Peace and Security, U.N. Doc. S/2002/1154 (Oct. 16, 2002), para. 13.
6. Article 4, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, G.A., Res. 2200A/ XXI, (Dec. 16, 1966), 52, U.N. Doc. A/6316 (Dec. 19, 1966), 99 9 U.N.T.S. 171, (entry into force on Mar. 23, 1976) [hereinafter ICCPR]
7. The Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field, Aug. 12, 1949, 75 U.N.T.S. 31, 32; Geneva Convention for the Ameliorat ion of the Condition of the Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of the Armed Forces at Sea, Aug. 12, 1949, 75 U.N.T.S. 85, 86; Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment to Prisoners of War, Aug. 12, 1949, 75 U.N.T.S. 135, 136 [hereinafter GC III]; Gene va Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, Aug. 12, 1949, 75 U.N.T.S. 287, 288 [hereinafter GC IV].
8. Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of August 12, 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts, June 8, 1977, 1125 U.N.T.S. 3 (entered into force Dec. 7, 1978) [hereinafter AP I]; Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of Non -International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), June 8, 1977, 1125 U.N.T.S. 609 [hereinafter AP II].
9. This view is increasingly debated nowadays. Andrew Clapham, Human Rights Obligations of Non -State Actors (2006) and Philip Alston (ed.), Non-State Actors and Human Rights (2005).
10. In complying with International Humanitarian Law, Individuals, who do not comply with IHL or HRL provisions, may be subject to criminal prosecution in case the non -compliance constitutes a war crime or a crime against humanity.
11. General principles of International Humanitarian Law, Hans -Peter Gasser, International Humanitarian Law: An Introduction (1993)
12. Article 12 Geneva Convention I and II, Article 16 Geneva Convention III, Article 27 Geneva Convention IV, Article 75 Additional Protocol I, and Article 4 Additional Protocol II.
13. Article 12 GC I and II, and Article 14 GC III
14. Judith Gardam & Michelle Jarvis, Women, Armed Conflict and International Law 19– 51 (2001)
15. Helen Durham, International Humanitarian Law and the Protection of Women, in Listening to the Silences: Women and War 95 (Helen Durham & Tracey Gurd eds., 2005)
16. Article 8(2) (b) (xxii) Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, adopted on July 17, 1998 by the U.N. Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries o n the Establishment of an International Criminal Court, entered into force, July 1, 2002, U.N. Doc. A/CONF.183/9 (1998) [hereinafter Rome Statute]. See also Meron, supra note 26, at 424–428.
17. Article 12(4) GC I and II; Article 14(2) GC III; Article 27 GC IV; Article 8(a) AP I,
18. Articles 38 and 50 GC IV, Article 76(2) AP I, Article 6(4) AP II.
19. Article 84 GC IV,
20. Articles 19 and 23 GC III; Article 83 GC IV,
21. Article 97(4), Article 108(2) GC III, Articles 76(4) and 124(3) GC IV.
22. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, G.A. Res. 217A (III), U.N. Doc. A/810 (1948) [hereinafter UDHR]. JHRLP (2019) 17–26 © Law Journals 2019. All Rights Reserved Page 26
23. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, G.A. Res. 2200A (XXI), 21 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 16) at 52, U.N. Doc. A/6316 (1966), 999 U.N.T.S. 171 [hereinafter ICCPR]; In ternational Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, opened for signature Dec. 16, 1966, 993 U.N.T.S. 3 (entered into force Jan. 3, 1976) [hereinafter ICESCR].
24. Fourth World Conference on Women, Action for Equality Development and Peace, Beijing De claration and Platform for Action, U.N. Doc. A/Conf.177/20 (Oct. 17, 1995), para. 135.
25. The slogan “Women’s rights are human rights” goes back to a statement of Hilary Rodham Clinton at the United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women, Beijing, China dat ed Sept. 5, 1995, available at americanrhetoric.com/speeche s/hillaryclintonbeijingspeech.htm (last visited May 10, 2007).
26. Article 12 ICESCR
27. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, G.A. Res. 34/180, U.N. GAOR, 34th Sess., Supp. No. 46, U.N. Doc. A/34/36 (Sept. 3, 1981) [hereinafter CEDAW].
28. Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, U.N. Doc. A/RES/54/4 (Oct. 15, 1999).
29. Article 1 CEDAW
30. Article 2 CEDAW,
31. U.N. Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), Eleventh Session, General Recommendation 19, U.N. Doc. CEDAW/C/1992/L.1/Add.15 /1992 ( Jan. 20–30, 1992), especially para. 7(b) [hereinafter General Recommendation 19] Available online: [https://www.refworld. org/docid/52d920c54.html]
32. S.C. Res 808 (1993), U.N. Doc. S/RES/808 (Feb. 22, 1993), preamble para. 11 and S.C. Res. 823 (1993), U.N. Doc. S/RES/823 (May 25, 1993), preamble para. 3.
33. S.C. Res. 955 (1994), U.N. Doc. S/RES/955 (Nov. 8, 1994).
34. Article 5 ICTY -Statute – Crime against Humanity and Article 4 ICTR -Statute, Violation of Article 3 common to the Four Geneva Conventions of 1949.
35. Kelly D. Askin, The Jurisprudence of International War Crimes Tribunals: Securing Gender Justice for so me Survivors, in Listening to the Silences: Women and War (Helen Durham & Tracey Gurd eds, 2005).
36. Prosecutor v. Kunarac, Case No. IT -96- 23-TQ IT -96-23/1-T, Judgement, Trial Chamber, (Feb. 22, 2001); Prosecutor v. Kunarac, Case No. IT -96-23-Q IT -96- 23/1A, J udgement, Appeals Chamber, (June 12, 2002); Prosecutor v. Akayesu, Case No. ICTR -96-4-T, Judgement, (Oct. 2, 1998). Cite this Article Nana Charles Nguindip . The Protection of Women during Armed Conflict: Crossing Legal Borders in the Application of International Humanitarian Law, Human Right Law and International Criminal Law Practice. 2019; 2(2): 17–26p.
