Reconciling the Rights of Local Communities and the Creation of Protected Areas for the Conservation of Biodiversity in Cameroon: Case Study of the Tofala Hill Wildlife Sanctuary
Keywords:
Rights, local communities, protected areas, conservation, biodiversity, Cameroon, Tofala Hill Wildlife Sanctuary, Wabane and Alou Sub Divisions, South West RegionAbstract
Despite the significant contribution of protected areas in halting the degradation of natural resources and conserving biodiversity in Central Africa‚ the proliferation of this mechanism, is also being questioned by local communities who feel threatened with the dispossession of their lands by governments in complicity with conservators and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Protected areas have stirred up conflicts‚ with social and economic impacts that affect catchment communities who rely on forest resources found within these areas‚ who have seen their livelihood opportunities eroded. This article closely examines the implications of creating protected areas on the rights of local communities in Cameroon‚ with a particular focus on the Tofala Hill Wildlife Sanctuary (THWS) in the Wabane and Alou Sub-Division‚ in the South West Region of Cameroon. The article holds that rather than promote communal land rights and participation in natural resource management‚ protected areas for and conservation has strengthened state’s supremacy over local communities in the management of natural resource.
References
1. A. J Eyebe, G. P. Dkamela and D. Endamana, ‘‘Overview of Human Wildlife Conflict in Cameroon’’, Poverty and Conservation Learning Group Discussion Paper No 05, 2012, p. 4.
2. By section 2 (1) of Decree No.95 -466-Pm of 20 July 1995 to lay down the conditions for the implementation of wildlife regulations.
3. S. Elias, ‘‘From Communal Forest to Protected Areas: The Implications of Tenure Changes in Natural Resource Management in Guatemala’’, Conservation and Society 10 (2), 2012, pp. 153 and 155
4. See generally article 2 of Decree No. 95 - 466-PM of 20 July 1995 to lay down the conditions for implementation of wildlife regulations.
5. PSMNR-SWR Newsletter, ‘‘Dos and Don’ts in Protected Areas’’, Conservation Echoes, A Quarterly Publication of the Programme for the Sustainable Management of Natural Resources in the South West Region, Issue No. 03, October-December 2014, p.5.
6. Ibid, p. 155.
7. A. Eamily and Z. Hishan, ‘‘The Effects of REDD + on Forest People in Africa: Access, Distribution, and Participation in Governance’’, Responsive Forest Governance Initiative (EFGI) Working Paper No. 1, CODESRIA, Dakar, 2014, p. 25.
8. Point 8and 9.
9. J. C. Ow omo, ‘‘The extent of Bagyeli Pygmy involvement in the development and Management Plan of the Campo Ma’an UTO’’, case study 8 – Cameroon – Campo Ma’an, 2001, p. 251.
10. Articles 26 and 27 of Law No 94/02 of 10/01/94 governing forest, wildlife and fishery.
11. Traditional gathering of timber and non - timber forest products, subsistence farming, fishing and hunting .
12. See R. Ngoufo, H. D. Tsague and M. Walter, ‘‘Improving the legal framework of wildlife resources management in Cameroon’’, Universitätsdrucke Göttingen, Goettingen, 2014, p. 24.
13. S. Elias, op. cit., p. 155. See also B. Foahom, ‘‘Biodiversity Planning Support Programme Integrating Bioversity into the Forest Sector Cameroon Case Study’’, Paper prepared for an international workshop on ‘‘Integration of Biodi versity in National Forestry Planning Programme’’, held in CIFOR Headquarters, Bogor, Indonesia, 2001, p. 1.
14. Cameroon started a programme of structural adjustment in 1988. Good forest management (of which conversation is an important part) was a principal element. The impact of the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio (when the Convention on Biodiversity was adopted) was to influence the policies and practices of the State’s funders and JHRLP (2019) 27-40 © Law Journals 2019. All Rights Reserved Page 37 emerged as conservation requirements for forest ecosystems.
15. S. Nguiffo, ‘‘One for est and two dreams: The constraints imposed on the Baka in Miatta by the Dja Wildlife Reserve’’, Case study 6, Cameroon – Dja Wildlife Reserve, 2001, p. 197.
16. Pritchard J. et al., ‘‘Securing community land and resource rights in Africa: A guide to legal ref orm and best practices’’, FERN, FPP, Client Earth and CED, 2013, p. 25.
17. S. Nguiffo, op. cit., p. 197. See also J. M. Mengang, ‘‘Evolution of National Resource Policy in Cameroon’’, Yale F&ES Bulletin, 102, p. 243.
18. Nguiffo S., Ibid.
19. A sanctuary is an area within which only specially designed animal or plant species are given full protection. See Section 2(9) of Decree No. 95 -466-PM of 20 July 1995.
20. S. Nguiffo, op. cit., p. 198.
21. Art. 1 of Decree No 2014/3212/PM of 29 Sep 2014 on creation of Tofala Hi ll Wildlife Sanctuary.
22. ERuDeF is an NGO based in Buea, established in 1999 to protect gorillas and chimpanzees in the Lebialem Highlands of Cameroon assisted the government of Cameroon to create the Tofala Hill Wildlife Sanctuary.
23. L.Nkembi and B. M uh, ‘‘Consolidating the Conservation of Cross River Gorillas (gorilla gorilla diehli) and Nigeria - Cameroon chimpanzees (P. T. Ellioti) in the Lebialem -Mone Forest Lanscape, Western Cameroon’’. The Environment and Rural Development Foundation, Cameroon, Final Report to People’s Trust for Endangered Species, UK, 2012, p. 5.
24. Which include: Bannerman’s turaco (Turaco bannermani), Banded wattled -eye (Plastyseria laticincta), Cameroon Montane Greenbul (Andropadus montanus), Bannerman’s weaver (Ploceus bannermani), Red headed Picathartes (Picathartes gymnocephalus), Green Breasted Bush -Shrike (:alaconotus gladiator) and Bangwa forest wabbler (Bradypterus bangwaensis).
25. L. Nkembi, R. Skeen and D. Ndeloh, ‘‘Conserving wildlife and protecting fragile environments’’, T he Lebialem Highlands Montane Birds’ Conservation Projects, South West Cameroon, Final Report, The Environment and Rural Development Foundation for the Rufford Foundation, UK, 2006, p. 7. See also M. F. Nkemnyi, ‘‘The Environment - Development Nexus and Grea t apes Conservation in Western Cameroon: the case of the proposed Tofala Hill Wildlife Sanctuary’’, Project Report Prepared by Resource Centre for Environment and Sustainable Development (RCESD), Cameroon/Institute of Development Policy and Management (IOB _, University of Antwerp, Belgium, the Rufor Foundation, p.5.
26. A. Dunn, ‘‘Revised Regional Action Plan for the Conservation of the Cross River Gorilla (Gorilla diehli) 2014-2019’’, 2014, p. 4. See also http://www.prnewswire.com and http://mobile.cameroonweb.com/, J. H. Wright and Human reliance’’, Endangered Species Research, Vol 11, 2010, pp. 11, 2010, pp. 1 -2, D.E. Ndeloh, ‘‘Ecological and Anthropogenic factors of Cross River gorilla (Gorilla gorilla diehli) survival at Mawambi Hills, southwest Cameroon’’, PhD Thesis, Vrije University Brussels, 2013, p. 1.
27. See http://www.prnewswire.com. See also L. Nkembi and B. Muh, op. cit., p.9.
28. L. Nkembi and B. Muh, op. cit., p. 5.
29. Ibid. See also See V. Nodem, J, N. Bamenjo & B. Schwartz, Sub National Natural Resource Revenue Managemnt in Cameroon: Forest and Mining Royalties in Yokadouma, East Cameroon, RELUFA, 2012, p. 11. See also USAID, op. cit., p. 6.
30. M. F. Nkemnyi, op.cit., p.20.
31. C. Ngoufack, S. A. Abossolo, and R. A. S. Batha, ‘‘Influence of farming activities in the cross river gorilla conservation in the Tofala Hills Wildlife Sanctuary (THWS), South-West region Cameroon, IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 2 Issue, 7, 2015, p. 314.
32. L. Nkembi, R. Skeen and D. Ndeloh, op. Case Study of the Tofala Hill Wildlife Sanctuary Nah Anthony Tetinwe JHRLP (2019) 27-40 © Law Journals 2019. All Rights Reserved Page 38 cit., p. 9. See also M. F. Nkemnyi, op. cit., p. 24.
33. B. Morgan et al., ‘‘Regional Action Plan for the Conservation of the Nigeria - Cameroon Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes ellioti)’’, IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group and Zoological Society of San Diego, CA, USA, 2011, p. 30.
34. C. Ngoufack, S. A. Abossolo, and R. A. S. Batha, op.cit., p. 313.
35. Ibid., p. 322.
36. L. Nkengla, ‘‘Commun ity-based forest management and changing gender roles in a patriarchal society in Cameroon: The case of Korup and Bechati forest areas’’, PhD Thesis, Environmental Sciences, Brandenburg University of Technology in Cottbus, 2014., p. 112.
37. Include automatic rifles, short guns both locally and factory made.
38. L. Nkengla, op.cit., p. 112.
39. Ibid., p. 113.
40. Ibid., p. 110.
41. M. F. Nkemnyi, op. cit., p. 21.
42. L. Nkengla, op.cit.,p. 106.
43. Ibid., p. 109.
44. Law No. 94/01 of 20 th January of 1994 to lay down Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries regulations.
45. Decree No. 95 -466-PM of 20 th July 1995 to lay down the conditions for the implementation of wildlife regulations.
46. G.P. Dkamela et al., ‘‘Lessons for REDD + from Cameroon’s past for estry law reform: a political economy analysis’’, Ecology and Society 19(3): 30, 2014, p. 1, http://dx.dio.org/10.5751.ES-06839- 190330, (accessed 20/07/2015).
47. L. Nkengla, op.cit., p. 77.
48. S. Nguiffo, op. cit., p. 204.
49. See generally Section 6.
50. L. Nkembi and B. Muh, op. cit., p. 14.
51. Ibid., p. 14.
52. Ibid., p. 15.
53. Principle10.
54. See Article 13 of the Charter.
55. Law 96/12 of 5 August 1996: Framework Law on Environmental Management.
56. Article 9(e).
57. The 1972 Declaration of the United nations Conference on the Human Environment at Stockholm.
58. A. Emily and Z. Hisham, op. cit., p. 17.
59. See N. S. Paudel, I. Monterroso and P. Cronkleton, ‘‘Secondary Level Organisation and the Democratisation. of Forest Governance: Case Studies from Nepal and Guatemala’’, Conservation and Society 10(2), 2012, p. 125.
60. L. Nkengla, op. cit., p. 76.
61. Ibid., p. 161.
62. See Article 8(1).
63. S. Nguiffo, op. cit., p. 204.
64. See Section 2(1) of the 1994 forest law.
65. Article 26 of the 1994 Forestry law.
66. Article 2(7), 1995 decree setting out the wildlife regulations.
67. L. Nkengla, op. cit., p.73.
68. Article 24 (1) of the 1994 Forestry Law.
69. G. Allen et al., ‘‘Empty T hreat Does the Law Combat Illegal Wildlife Trade? A Ten-Country Review of Legislative and Judicial Approaches’’, Full -Report, DLA Piper, UK, 2014, p. 8.
70. Hunting is any action which aims at: chasing, killing and capturing a wild animal or guiding expedition s for such purposes; photographing and filming wild animals for commercial purposes. See Section 3(3) of Decree No/ 95 -466-PM of 20th July 1995.
71. Section 24 (1) of Decree No. 95 -466-PM of 20th July 1995.
72. Section 24 (2), ibid.
73. Section 24 (3), ibid.
74. Traditional hunting is hunting carried out using weapons made from materials of plant origin. See Section 2 (20) of Decree No. 95-466-PM of 20 July 1995.
75. H. Yasuoka, ‘‘Snare Hunting Among Baka Hunter -Gatherers: Implications for Sustainable Wildlife Management’’, African Study Monographs, Suppl. 49, 2014. P.132.
76. Article 8 (1) of the 1994 forestry and wildlife law.
77. J. C. Owono, op. cit., p. 259.
78. See The Principles and Guidelines on Protected areas and Indigenous / JHRLP (2019) 27-40 © Law Journals 2019. All Rights Reserved Page 39 Traditional Peoples, Point No. 2.4 Cited by S. Nguiffo, op.cit., p. 210.
79. C. Ngoufack, S. A. Abossolo, and R. A. S. Batha, op. cit., p. 320.
80. S. Nguiffo, op. cit., p. 211.
81. See the Supreme Court of Cameroon, Affaire Bessala Awona c/ Bidzogo Génevièvr Cor. A No 445, 3 rd April 1962 Cited by S. Nguiffo, Ibid.
82. B. Foahom, op. cit., p.1.
83. J. Pritchard et al., op. cit., p. 8.
84. The decision is available at http://www.achpr.org/files/sessions/46th/c ommunications/276.03/achpr46_276_03_e ng.pdf.
85. J. Pritchard et al., op. cit., pp 9 & 11.
86. In 1973, the Endorois community was disposed of its ancestral lands – Lake Bogoria, located in the heart of Kenya’s Rift Valley, was to become a wildlife reserve. Severing the Endorois’ ties with their ancestral land not only threatened their socio -economic well-being, but also their spiritual and cultural survival as an indigenous people. The failure to consult the community or involve them or to compensate the com munity with adequate grazing land following their eviction severely depleted the livestock of the herding community.
87. J. Pritchard et al., op. cit., p. 11.
88. R. Ngoufo, H. D. Tsague and M. Waltert, op. cit., p. 25.
89. L. Nkengla, op. cit., p. 80. See also A. M. Larson and G. R. Dahal, ‘‘Forest Reform: New Resource Rights for Forest -based Communities?’’, Conservation and Society 10 (2), 2012, p. 105.
90. Ibid., p. 76.
91. F. N. Mbunya, ‘‘The Environment - Development Nexus and Great Apes Conservation in Western Camer oon: the case of the proposed Tofola Hill Wildlife Sanctuary’’, The Rufford Small Grants Foundation, final Report, 2013, p. 2.
92. Opinions of some natives of the neighbouring communities.
93. F. N. Mbunya, op. cit., p. 2.
94. L. Nkengla, op. cit., p. 93.
95. Ibid., p. 94.
96. M. F. Nkemnyi, op.cit., p. 18.
97. F. Steven, ‘‘OPACITY: A Socioeconomic Study of Diamond Mining in South-Eastern Cameroon, ISP Collection Paper 728, 2009, p. 37, available at http://digitacollections.sit.endu/isp_colle ction/728. (Accessed 20th July 2015).
98. See Article 10(c) and (d).
99. J. C. Owono, op.cit., p. 259.
100. S. Elias, op. cit., p. 159.
101. L. Nkengla, op. cit., p. 19.
102. Ibid., p. 20.
103. J. Oates, et al., ‘‘Regional Action Plan for the Conservation of the Cross River Gorilla (Gorilla gorilla diehli)’’, JUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group and Conservation International, Arlington, VA, USA, 2007, p. 19.
104. J. Pritchard et al., op. cit., p. 10.
105. L. Nkengla, op. cit., p. 163.
106. Nah Anthony T,” Balancing Competing claims of Indigenous Rights into Reality and the Exploitation of Natural Resources: Case study of the Baka People in the East Region of Cameroon”, Revue de la Recherche Juridique , 2016, P.1288.
107. C. Blim, ‘‘Management For est Wildlife for Human Livelihoods in the Korup - Oban Hills region, West -Central Africa Community-based wildlife management models: A joint vision for future protection of wildlife and rural livelihoods’’, Discussion Paper Series No. 04/09, p. 1, available at http://www.uni- goettingen.de/en/115492.html, (accessed 20/12/2015).
108. Ibid. see also C. Ngoufack, S. A. Abossolo, and R. A. S. Batha, op.cit., p. 321., S. Elias, op., p. 159., etc.
109. C. Ngoufack, S. A. Abossolo, and R. A. Case Study of the Tofala Hill Wildlife Sanctuary Nah Anthony Tetinwe JHRLP (2019) 27-40 © Law Journals 2019. All Rights Reserved Page 40 S. Batha, Ibid, p. 321.
110. C. Blum, op.cit., p. 1.
111. S. Elias, op.cit., p. 159.
112. J. H. Wright and N. E. C. Priston, op. cit., p. 8.
113. T. O. Egute, E. Albrecht and S. A. Ajonina, ‘‘The Legal protection of Biodiversity in Cameroon’’, Journal of Environment and Human, 2014, P. 11.
114. S. Elias, op.cit., p. 158.
115. S. Elias, op. cit., p. 158. Cite this Article Nah Anthony Tetinwe . Reconciling the Rights of Local Communities and the Creation of Protected Areas for the Conservation of Biodiversity in Cameroon: Case Study of the Tofala Hill Wildlife Sanctuary. Journal of Human Rights Law and Practice. 2019; 2(1): 27–40p
