Female Genital Mutilation: A Dark Practice of Violating Women’s Human Right
Keywords:
Female Genital Mutilation, Religious Beliefs, Khatna, Female Sexuality, Human Rights.Abstract
The term Female Genital Mutilation (FGM), refers to all procedures involving partial or total removal of the external female genitalia or other injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons. Millions of girls and women have undergone this cruel procedure and still do every year in the name of religious beliefs. Female genital mutilation has been reported to occur in all parts of the world, but it is most prevalent in the western, eastern, and north-eastern regions of Africa, some countries in Asia and the Middle East and among certain immigrant communities in North America and Europe. India also finds a place amongst these mentioned regions of the world. In India, this practice is common amongst the Bohra community, where the ritual is referred to as “Khatna” or “Khafz/Khafd”. Khatna essentially involves cutting the tip of a girl's clitoris when she is 6-7 years old. Members of the family are usually involved in the decision-making about FGM. Amongst various other socio-cultural reasons given for this cruel practice besides religious beliefs are an aid to female hygiene and a tool to control or reduce female sexuality. As the definition of the term itself suggests, Female Genital Mutilation is done for no-medical reasons at all which makes it the perfect subject for Human Rights Violation. In India there are no explicit provision prohibiting the practice of FGM, despite the fact that India is a signatory of UN resolution for protection of Child and Women and ending all types of exploitation. The government does not have any plans to draft a new law to address the issue of FGM in India. To curb the practice, the government feels necessary safeguards are available in the existing laws, such as Indian Penal Code, 1860 and the Prevention of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. These laws do not explicitly prohibit the practice of FGM. The object of this paper is to analyze various aspects of FGM and to critically examine the Indian Legal Framework regarding it. We also aim to make some necessary recommendations to explicitly prohibit FGM in India altogether
References
1. OHCHR, UNAIDS, UNDP, UNECA, UNESCO, UNFPA, UNHCR, UNICEF, UNIFEM, WHO (2008). Eliminating Female genital mutilation an interagency statement. [online] World Health Organisation. Available at: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/p ublications/fgm/9789241596442/en/. JHRLP (2019) 9-18 © Law Journals 2019. All Rights Reserved Page 17
2. Female genital mutilation. (2018). [Blog] UNICEF Data: Monitoring the situation of children and women . Available at: https://data.unicef.org /topic/child-protection/female-genital- mutilation/
3. Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting : A GLOBAL CONCERN. (2016). UNICEF.
4. Trust for Promotion of wellness and wellbeing of people (n.d.). Female Genital Mutilation: A guide to eliminate FGM in India. Speak Out on FGM.
5. United Nations C hildren’s Fund, Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A statistical overview and exploration of the dynamics of change, UNICEF, New York, 2013.
6. Fgmnationalgroup.org. (n.d.). FGM National Clinical Group - Historical & Cultural. [online] Available at: http://www.fgmnationalgroup.org/historic al_and_cultural.htm
7. Anantnarayan, L., Diler, S. and Menon, N. (2018). The Clitoral Hood A Contested Site Khafd or Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) in India . wespeakout.
8. Sengar, S. (2018). With No Laws, Extensive Female Genital Mutilation Among Muslim Bohra Community In India Is Scarring Women For Life. India Times. [online] Available at: https://www.indiatimes.com/news/india/wi th-no-laws-extensive-female-genital- mutilation-among-muslim-bohra- community-in-india-is-scarring-women- for-life-339205.html
9. Sunita Tiwari v. Union of India [2018] SC.
10. Mandhani, A. (2017). SC Issues Notice On PIL Seeking Complete Ban On Female Genital Mutilation. Live Law.
11. The Hindu (2018). FGM a human rights issue: Tharoor.
12. Das Gupta, M. (2017). Govt will end female genital mutilation if Bohras don’t: Maneka Gandhi. Hindustan Times.
13. First Post (2017). Female Genital Mutilation: Report recommends separate law, sensitisation to eradicate practice in India.
14. Rymer, J. (2006). Female genital mutilation. The Lancet, 368(9535), p.579.
15. Burrage, H. (2015). FGM (Fema le Genital Mutilation). [Blog] Hilary Burrage.
16. Macfarlane, A. (2018). 3.3 -O5Estimating the prevalence of female genital mutilation in England and Wales. European Journal of Public Health, 28(suppl_1).
17. Chung, S. (2016). The Psychological Effects of Female Genital Mutilation . [Blog] 28 Too Many.
18. Vloeberghs, E., van der Kwaak, A., Knipscheer, J. and van den Muijsenbergh, M. (2012). Coping and chronic psychosocial consequences of female genital mutilation in the Netherlands. Ethnicity & Health , 17(6), pp.677-695.
19. Behrendt, A. and Moritz, S. (2005). Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Memory Problems After Female Genital Mutilation. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(5), pp.1000-1002.
20. Whitehorn, J., Ayonrinde, O. and Maingay, S. (2002). Female genital mutilation: Cultural and psychological implications. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 17(2), pp.161-170.
21. Rodgers, S. (2015). FGM AND INITIATION RITES. [Blog] 28 Too Many.
22. Toubia, N. (1994). Female genital mutilation and the responsibility of reproductive health professionals. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 46(2), pp.127-135.
23. Berg, R. and Denison, E. (2012). Effectiveness of Interventions Designed to Prevent Female Genital Mutilation /Cutting: A Systematic Review. Studies in Family Planning, 43(2), pp.135-146.
24. El-Defrawi, M., Lotfy, G., Dandash, K., Refaat, A. and Eyada, M. (2001). Female Genital Mutilation and its Psychosexual Impact. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 27(5), pp.465-473. Female Genital Mutilation Trivedi and Mongia JHRLP (2019) 9-18 © Law Journals 2019. All Rights Reserved Page 18
25. Whitehorn, J., Ayonrinde, O. and Maingay, S. (2002). Female genital mutilation: Cultural and psychological implications. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 17(2), pp.161-170.
26. National Human Rights Commission, India (2018). Human Rights Council adopts 10 texts, requests a meeting on female genital mutilation an d decides to hold a panel discussion on women and climate change.
27. United nations Human Rights, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
28. Universal Declaration of Human Rights
29. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women
30. Supra 4 Cite this Article Garima Trivedi, Jahanvi Mongia. Female Genital Mutilation: A Dark Practice of Violating Women’s Human Right. Journal of Human Rights Law and Practice. 2019; 2(1): 9–18p
