Striving Balance between Article 19(1)(a) and Section 124-A of IPC: A Legitimate Interests in Present Scenario
Keywords:
Freedom of speech and expression, sedition, Section 124-A, Article 19(1)(a), country.Abstract
The labor of our nationalists reaps in liberal democratic country securing its citizens the fundamental right to express their legitimate thought, which was once deprived in the country .Regardless of sedition as a ground for restriction of freedom of speech and expression is deliberately been omitted by the members of constitutional assembly, it finds its place in the statute book as an offence under section 124-A of IPC. Apex court allows disapprobation as legitimate interests in line with the decision of federal court in Niharendu Dutt Majumdar v The King Emperor. Howsoever there has been a wide discord between Higher judiciary ; executive and lower judiciary in approaching the section .The blatant use of the section 124-A to repress the voice of individuals when it goes against the political interests or agenda of the government established by law in an alarming rate , shifts us back to colonial regime .As rightly enunciated by Justice Balbir Singh Chauhan ,the chairman of 21st Law commission of India, the application of this section needs reconsideration. Though in accordance with current scenario, it does not need to be struck off from statute book, yet blatant use of the section needs to be halted and the balance between article 19(1)(a) and section 124-A deserves to be achieved.
References
1. Indian penal code ,section 124-A , It reads as follows; (whoever, by words, either spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise, brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt ,or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards the government established by law in India ,shall be punished with imprisonment for life ,to which fine or with impris onment which am extend to three years ,to which the fine may be added or with fine . Explanation 1 – The expression “disaffection” includes disloyalty and all feelings of enmity. Explanation2 – comments expressing disapprobation of the measures of the government with a view to obtain their alteration by lawful means, without exciting or attempting to excite hatred, Striving Balance between Article 19(1) (a) and Section 124-A of IPC M.N. Kaushika JHRLP (2019) 41-47 © Law Journals 2019. All Rights Reserved Page 46 contempt or disaffection, do not constitute an offence under this section. Explanation 3 - comments expressing disapprobation of the administrative or other action of the government without exciting or attempting to excite hatred, contempt or disaffection, do not constitute an offenc e under this section)., http://indiankanoon.org>doc
2. Javed Habib v. State of Delhi (2007) 96 DRJ 693
3. Section 113 of the draft code as follows :( whoever by words either spoken on intended to be read ,or by signs or by visible representations ,attempts to ex cite feelings of disaffection to the government established by law in the territories of the east India company among any class of people who live under that government ,shall be punished with banishment for life or for any term ,from the territories of th e east India company to which fine may be added ,or with sim0le imprisonment for a term which any extend to 3 years ,to which fine may be added or with fine Explanation: such a disapprobation of the measures of the government as is compatible with a dispo sition to render obedience to the lawful authority of the government against unlawful attempts to subvert or resist that authority is not disaffection. Therefore the making of comments on the measures of the government ,with the intention of exciting only this species of disapprobation is not an offence within this case) derived from 018-freedom of speech and the law of sedition in India, Indian Law institute ,14.139.60.114>jspui>bitstream>018
4. Subject matter in the protection of law, In gremio legis law and legal definition| US legal, Inc.http://definitions.uslegal.com>in- gremi...
5. A treatise on the law of sedition and cognate offences in British India ,penal and preventive with an excerpt of the acts in force relating to press .the stage and public meetings , Walter Russell Donogh ,Thacker,Spink&co ,10911 ,pg 1 ,http://archive.org>details>onlawofseditio n..Accessed on 27/10/2018.
6. Section 5 of Act XXVII of 1870 reads as follows – whoever by words either spoken or intended to be read or by signs or by visible rep resentations or otherwise ,excites or attempt to excite feelings of disaffection towards the government established by law in British India ,shall be punished with transportation for life or for any term to which fine may be added or with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years ,to which fine may be added or without fine , A New Look at modern Indian History(From 1707 to The Modern…. , Grover B. L. & Mehta Alka , http://books.google.co.in>books accessed at 26/10/2018
7. Sedition laws& the death of free speech in India-National law school of India...http://www.nls.ac.in>csseip>files>s e...
8. S. Khusboo v. Kanniamal & Anr , AIR 2010 SC 3196
9. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India AIR 2015 SC 1523
10. Newspaper (Bombay) (P) Ltd. v. Union of India, AIR 1986 SC 515
11. A treatise on the law of sedition and cognate offences in British India, penal and preventive with an excerpt of the acts in force relating to press. the stage and public meetings, Walter Russell Donogh ,Thacker,Spink&co ,10911 ,pg 1 ,http://archive.org>details>onlawofsedition..
12. Queen Empress v Bala Gangadara tilak, ILR (1898) 22 Bom 112
13. Consultation paper on sedition 2018, Law commission of India, www. lawcommissionofindia.nic.in>cp...
14. Queen Empress v. Ramchandra Narayan, ILR (1898) 22 Bom 152
15. Queen Empress v. Amba Prasad, ILR (1897) 20 All 55
16. King-Emperor v. Sadasiv Narayan Bhalerao (1944) 46 BomLR 459
17. Tara Singh Gopi Chand v The State ,1951 CriLJ 449
18. Ram Nandan v. State, AIR 1959 All 101.
19. Kedar Nath Singh v state of Bihar, AIR 1962 SCC 955.
20. V.A. Pugalenthi v. State Crl. O.P. No. 21463 of 2017, decided on 9/11/2017 JHRLP (2019) 41-47 © Law Journals 2019. All Rights Reserved Page 47
21. Javed Habib v. State of Delhi (2007) 96 DRJ 693
22. Arun Jaitley v union of India ,2016 (1) ADJ 76
23. Mohandas Gandhi, Famous Speeches by Mahatma Gandhi; Great Trial of 1922, Gandhian Institute Bombay Sarvodaya Mandal and Gandhi Research Foundation. Available at www.mkgandhi.org/speeches, accessed on 16/04/2012
24. Anushka Singh, Persecution in the name of sedition finds popular acceptance in…Live La w …http://www.livelaw.in>persecution- name...
25. Sedition case: court frames charges against Hardik Patel and his 2 aides...http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com>
26. Ramya faces sedition case for ‘Pakistan not hell remark: India .http://www.reddit.com>r>india
27. Sedition case against Jaitely -The Hindu, http://www.thehindu.com>news...
28. Sc grants bail to Binayak sen, says no case for sedition charge, Dhananjay Mahapatra& Supriya Sharma, http://timesofindia sc-grants-bail-to- Binayak-Sen-says-no-case-for-sedition- charge/articleshow/798713.cms?
29. Does critizing India Count as Sedition?Arundhati roy will find out , vibhuti Agarwal ,The wall street journal ,http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/20101 1/30/does-crticizing-india-count-as- sedition-arundati-roy-will-find-out /accessed on 28/10/2018
30. Vaiko surrenders in sedition case, goes to puzhal jail for 15 days for supporting http://www.thenewsminute.com>...
31. Delhi police soon to charge Kanhaiya Kumar, Umar Khalid in sed ition case…,http://economicstimes.indiatimes.c om>
32. Anti-graft cartoonist Assem Trivedi arrested on sedition charges -India News, http://www.indiatoday.in.>india...
33. Lecturer who set ‘seditious’ question paper arrested in Kashmir –DNA India, http://www.dnaindia.com>India...
34. Global freedom of expression |Binayak sen v chatisgarh -global freedom, http://globalfreedomofexpression.columbi a.ed.
35. Common Cause & Anr. v. UOI, (2016) 15 SCC 269
36. Kedar Nath Singh v State of Bihar, AIR 1962 SCC 955 Cite this Article M.N. Kaushika. Striving Balance between Article 19(1) (a) and Section 124 -A of IPC- A Legitimate Interests in Present Scenario. Journal of Banking and Insurance Law. 2018; 1(1): 41–47p.
