Global Dynamics of Corruption: Analysis of the Regional Bodies to Build Integrity and Effectiveness to Fight Against
Keywords:
Corruption, Criminalisation, Illicit activities, Preventive measures, Regional bodiesAbstract
This article intends to analyse the global dynamics of the selected regional bodies in building integrity and effectiveness in fighting against corruption where appropriate and necessary. The recognition of massive acts of corruption in the early 1990s facilitate the establishment of regional bodies to build integrity between the people, and effective instruments to fight against corruption globally. Findings show that each regional body is unique in its history and nature from its establishment, similarities exist and are often transferable. However, ambiguities in definitions, criminalization acts, and measures to prevent corrupt activities bring ineffectiveness to the systems and fail to identify opportunities to reinforce the comprehensive integrity of fighting corruption. Methodology: This article adopts qualitative and quantitative methods to review the existing literature to generate data, and to analyse the role of the existing regional bodies to see the extent of building integrity and its effectiveness in fighting against corruption.
References
See Saphy L.B., The Genesis of Corruption and Its’ Perception. National Journal of Criminal Law. Volume 1, Issue 1. (2018) p32. Available at www.stmjournals.com
See also International Conference Notes: Forms of Corruption in History and Contemporary Soci-ety, Origins, Community (CORHICS) Paris 1 2011. Available at www.wikicfo.com
The Quran; Surat Baqarah (chapter 2:188).
The bible (Mathew 26:14-16) and (Mark 14:10-11).
See Also Carr I., Fighting Corruption Through Regional and International Conventions: A Satis-factory Solution? (2006) p2.
See Alatas, S., Corruption, Its Nature, Causes and Functions. Aldershot: Brookfield, Bergstein & Elliott K (Eds) Corruption in The World Economy 1997 Washington: (1990). Institute for Interna-tional Economics.
United Nations Convention Against Corruption (2004: iii); Rose-Ackerman also argued that some other international professional and business organizations have also put the anti-corruption ini-tiative on their agenda. (1999)
See also Hassan H., and Placek M., Corruption and Social Human Rights in Developing Countries (eds). The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Problem. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. (2022). Available at https://doi.org/10 .1007/978-3-2-193-1.
See also Pillay P., Ethics and accountability in South African municipalities: The struggle against corruption. African Journal of Public Affairs, Vol. 9 No. 2. (2016) p.2 Available at www.repoci-tory.up.ac.za
See also the World Bank Opinion Corruption is a Global Problem for Development. To Fight It, We All Have a Role to Play. (2023). Available at www.worldbank.org
Mbaku (2007: ix). Corruption in Africa Causes, Consequences, and Clean-ups. Similarly, Pilla (2004:586). Corruption – The Challenge to Good Governance: A South African Perspective argues that dealing effectively with corrupt transactions remains one of the most important challenges in developing countries. Pillay (2004:586) further states that corruption fundamentally runs contrary to accountability and the rule of law because it undermines governance, diminishes public trust in the credibility of the state and threatens the ethics of government and society. Additionally, corrup-tion has been identified as the greatest obstacle that impedes the world’s economic and social de-velopment and undermines development by destroying and weakening the institutions to fight against corruption.
See Hope et al (eds). Corruption and Development in Africa: Lesson from Country Case Study (2000:1). See also Spyromitros, E, and Panagiotidis, M., The Impact of Corruption on Economic Growth in developing countries and a Comparative analysis of corruption measurement indicators. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1). (2022). Available at https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2129368
The United Nations Convention Against Corruption (2003) p. iii.
See also Tanzi., Corruption around the World: Causes, Consequences, Scope and Cures (1998) p.576. Tanzi further argues that in some jurisdictions, the concept of corruption is very narrow and some jurisdictions do not have the crime of corruption or bribery at all, however, that does not mean that certain acts that are typically regarded as corruption are lawful.
See also Tanzi V., Corruption around the World: Causes, Consequences, Scope and Cures. (1998) p.576. Available at www.imf.org
Saphy B., The Genesis of Corruption and Its' Perception; National Journal of Criminal Law. (2019). P.1. Available at www.researchgate.net
SADC Protocol against Corruption, 2000.
Art. 1 of the SADC Protocol against Corruption, (2000).
Art. 3 of the AU Convention on Prevention and Combating Corruption (2003).
Oxford Advanced Leaner’s Dictionary, 8th Edition, International Student’s Edition Oxford Univer-sity Press (2010).
See Hope et al (eds) Corruption and Development in Africa: Lesson from Country Case Study (2000). p.1; See also Spyromitros, E, and Panagiotidis, M ., The Impact of Corruption on economic growth in developing countries and a comparative analysis of corruption measurement indicators. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1). (2022).
See also a World Bank Report of 2008.
Oxford Advanced Leaner's Dictionary 8th Edition (2010).
Wathne, C., Understanding corruption and how to curb it. Bergen: U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, Chr. Michelsen Institute. (2021): p.3. Available at www.u4.no/publications
Kibwana K., Initiatives against Corruption in Kenya: Legal and Policy Interventions Clari Press, Nairobi. (2001): p.14).
Riara B., Grand Corruption as a Crime Against Humanity (2014): p. 2. Available at www.kenya-law.org
Klitgaard R., Controlling Corruption Berkeley (University of California Press). (1988).
International Conference Notes: forms of corruption in history and contemporary society: origins, continuity, evolution (CORHICS) Paris 1 Sorbonne University 2011. Available at http://corruption-researchnetwork.org
Euben, J.P. Corruption. In Ball, T., Farr, J. and Hanson, R.L. (eds), Political innovation and con-ceptual change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (1989): p.222.
Art. 2 of the EU Conventions on the Fight against Corruption of 1997.
Transparency Index of Report. See also Pillay P., (2016): p.2.
Elaine ., Moral and Legal Development of Corruption: Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Corrup-tion in Ireland. (2007):p. 49. Elaine further argues that this kind of corruption takes place at the policy formulation end of politics. Corruption refers not so much to the amount of money involved as to the level at which it takes place. Grand corruption is at the top levels of the public sphere, where policies and rules are formulated in the first place.
Rose-Ackerman Democracy and Grand Corruption (2000): p.323. Similar to Palmer Combating Grand Corruption in Africa: Should it be an International Crime? States that grand corruption is used in two senses: (2012): p. 31. it refers either to specific acts of corruption involving particularly large amounts of money, usually at senior levels of government, or to corrupt practices that result in the abuse of systems designed to ensure good and effective governance. Palmer further states that the sustained abuse of such systems can result in the entrenchment of the corrupt practices as part of the systems, at which point these practices are referred to as 'systemic corruption.
Doig and Theobold (eds) Corruption and Democratization (2000) :p. 9.
See also Woods, G. and Mantzaris, E.A. The anti-corruption reader. ACCERUS, School of Public Leadership, Stellenbosch University. Stellenbosch. (2012). Woods and Mantzaris say that those who are at the higher levels of the public service have been called grand corruption politicians committing political corruption and administrators in middle management or lower in petty cor-ruption. Money procured from corruption varies greatly.
See also Doig and Theobold (2000): p.7; Similar to that Palmer (2012): p.4 states that petty corrup-tion means either specific acts of the abuse of power by public officials for some small bribes or relatively minor benefits or more serious corruption at the managerial level.
Similarly, Pillay (2016):p. 4 states that petty corruption takes place at the lower and middle admin-istrative levels mainly when there is direct contact between officials and citizens on an everyday or weekly basis.
Transparent Index (2000).
Blundo and Olivier de Sardan., The Popular Semiology of Corruption. (2006): p.218.
See also Theobald R., Corruption, Development, and underdevelopment (Basingstoke Hampshire UK: Macmillan. (1990).
The United Nations Convention against Corruption [UNCAC].
The Convention Against Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions to criminalize any bribery of foreign public officials of 1999
The African Union Convention on Preventing and Combating Corruption in 2003.
The General Assembly Resolution 58/4 of 31 October 2003.
The General Assembly (53/111 of 1998) resolved decided to establish an open-ended intergovern-mental ad hoc committee to elaborate a comprehensive international convention against transna-tional organised crime and discuss the elaboration, as appropriate, of international instruments addressing trafficking in women and children, combating the illicit manufacturing of and traffick-ing in firearms, their parts and components and ammunition, and illegal trafficking in and trans-porting of migrants including by sea.
The General Assembly (53/111 of 1998) Strongly convinced that the Convention will constitute an effective tool and the necessary legal framework for international cooperation in combating, inter alia, such criminal activities as money laundering, corruption, illicit trafficking in endangered spe-cies of wild growing links between transnational organised crime and terrorist crimes.
Available at www.unodc.org; and see also Dell (2006): p. 29. Dell states that the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (UNTOC) recognises that corruption is an integral com-ponent of transnational organised crime and must be addressed as part of efforts to combat organ-ised crime.
Nagle., The Challenges of Fighting Global Organized Crime in Latin America (2003):26. ; Webb (2005): p. 203 in his paper emphasises that the Convention focuses on the activities of 'organized criminal groups', but recognizes that corruption is often an instrument or effect of organized crime and includes several provisions to address this. He further states that the main one is the require-ment that each party adopt laws and other necessary measures to criminalise active and passive corruption in connection to the exercise of the duties of government officials.
Art. 1 of the UNCAC.
Art. 3 of the UNCAC.
See also Nagle (2003): p. 26.
Similarly, Art.1 of the Convention provides that the purpose of the Convention is to promote coop-eration to prevent and combat transnational organized crime more effectively.
Preamble of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1997.
The OECD Anti-Bribery Convention.
See also Art. 1 of the OECD Convention.
The African Union Convention on Preventing and Combating Corruption (2003).
See also Sall, fighting Corruption in Africa: A Tremendous Challenge (2014).
Resolution AHG-Dec 126(XXXIV).
The African Union Convention on Preventing and Combating Corruption (2003)
Jatto., Africa's Approach to the International War on Corruption: A Critical Appraisal of the African Union Convention on Preventing and Combating Corruption (2010): p. 83. Jatto further says that the AU Convention adopts a holistic and pragmatic approach to combating both foreign and domestic corruption. It seeks to engender and reinforce the development of mechanisms necessary for the prevention, detection, punishment, and eradication of corruption and related offences in the public and private sectors, as well as to establish conditions necessary for ensuring transparency and accountability in the management of public affairs.
See also Webb. The United Nations Convention against Corruption Global Achievement or Missed Opportunity. (2005): p. 203
Art. 2 of the AU Convention.
The Convention provides its objectives as to:1. Promote and strengthen the development in Africa by each State Party, of mechanisms required to prevent, detect, punish and eradicate corruption and related offences in the public and private sectors; 2. Promote, facilitate and regulate co-operation among the States Parties to ensure the effectiveness of measures and actions to prevent, detect, punish and eradicate corruption and related offences in Africa; 3. Coordinate and harmonize the policies and legislation between State Parties for the purpose of prevention, detection, punishment and eradication of corruption on the continent; 4. Promote socio-economic development by remov-ing obstacles to the enjoyment of economic, social and cultural rights as well as civil and political rights; and 5. Establish the necessary conditions to foster transparency and accountability in the management of public affairs.
The SADC Protocol against Corruption of 2000.
Preambles of the SADC Protocol.
Art. 2 of the SADC Protocol.
Available at http://www.sadc.int.
ECOWAS Protocol.
Art. 3 of the Protocol.
Art 5. of the ECOWAS Protocol.
Art. 5(3) of the UNCAC.
See also Art. 5 of the ANCAC.
Art. 6 (1) of the UNCAC.
Art 7 of the UNCAC.
see also Art. 9 (1) of the UNITOC, 2004.
Art. 9(2) of the UNITOC, 2004.
Available at http://www.sadc.int.
See also a Handbook of Institute of Security Study (2004): p. 12.
Art 5. of the ECOWAS Protocol.
Art 16 of the UNCAC, 2004.
Article 17 of the UNCAC ordered the State Parties to establish criminal offences related to the embezzlement of property in the private sector. Under Art. 19 of the UNCAC also establishes of-fences about the abuse of functions, including misappropriation, mismanagement or any other act or omission that may be conducted by the public official for his or her benefit or the benefit of another person or organisation in connection with any property, public or private funds or securities or anything of value entrusted to the public official.
Art.8 (1) of the UNTOC, 2004.
Art. 8 (2) of the UNTOC, 2004.
See also Saphy L. B., Legal Challenges to The Effective Implementation of Anti-Corruption Strat-egies in Selected African Countries. LLD Thesis at the North-West University, South Africa. (2019): p. 56.
Art. 3 of the SADC Protocol.
Art. 6 of the Protocol.
Art. 6(1) of the Protocol.
Art. 9(2) of the UNCAC, 2003.
Art 11(2) of the UNCAC, 2003.
Art. 11 (2) of the UNTOC, 2004.
Also, art. 11 (4) of the UNTOC, 2004 emphasises that each State Party shall ensure that its courts or other competent authorities bear in mind the grave nature of the offences covered by this Con-vention when considering the eventuality of early release or parole of persons convicted of such offences.
Art. 6(1).
Art.6(2).
See also Art. 10(1) of the SADC Protocol.
Art 12 of the ECOWAS Protocol
Art. 13 (1) of the Protocol.
Art 13 of the ECOWAS Protocol.
Art 15 of the ECOWAS Protocol.
Art 15 (3) of the ECOWAS Protocol.
Mmbao (2011): p. 285.
Jatto (2010): p. 88.
Carr., Corruption, Legal Solutions and Limits of The Law (2007): p. 235.
See also Nagle., The Challenges of Fighting Global Organized Crime in Latin America. (2003): p. 26.
Webb (2005): p. 203.
Dell G., Anti-Corruption Conventions in Africa: What Civil Society Can Do to Make Them Work (2006): p. 24.
Cloots et al., the International Legal Framework against Corruption: Achievements and Chal-lenges (2013): p. 218.
Babu., the United Nations Convention against Corruption: A Critical Overview. (2006): p. 8.
Nagle The Challenges of Fighting Global Organized Crime in Latin America. (2003): p. 1665. Nagle argues that the Convention was established in response to international calls to address global organised crime by closing major loopholes that hinder international enforcement efforts and allow organised crime to flourish.
Similarly, Christopher., Damned if You Do, Damned if You Don't? (1999): pp. 1303-04. Christo-pher stipulates that the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention requires signatories to criminalize inten-tionally offering, promising or giving any undue pecuniary or another advantage, whether directly or through intermediaries, to a foreign public official, for that official or a third party, so that the official act or refrain from acting about the performance of official duties, to obtain or retain business or another improper advantage in the conduct of international business.
Nagle (2003): p. 1665.
Rosenvinge., Global Anti-Corruption Regimes: Why law schools may want to take a multi-juris-dictional approach. (2009): p.790.
Similarly, Webb(2005:203) emphasises that it focuses on the activities of 'organized criminal groups', but recognizes that corruption is often an instrument or effect of organized crime and includes several provisions to address this. Webb further states that the main concern is based on the requirements that each party adopt laws and other necessary measures to criminalize active and passive corruption in connection with the exercise of the duties of government officials.
Mbaku (2010): pp. 63-64.
Jatto., Africa's Approach to the International War on Corruption: A Critical Appraisal of the African Union Convention on Preventing and Combating Corruption (2010): p. 83.
Jatto (2010): p. 83 further observes that the AU Convention covers a range of issues obliging parties to take three essential steps: (i) prevent corruption, (ii) criminalise corruption and (iii) cooperate with other AU members on matters of corruption.
Mbaku (2010): pp. 61-62.
