Employee Rights and Protections during Corporate Restructuring
Keywords:
Corporate Restructuring, assets, liabilities, obligations, capital, share-holdingAbstract
The corporate reconstruction is a complete financial aspect involving transfer of assets, liabilities, obligations, capital, share-holding, management and workforce too. A question arises as to the transfer of workforce, they being a part of the company and the company as a separate entity are co-dependent. The transfer of an employee is treated just like the transfer of assets, them being individuals they aren’t given much importance and a provided with minimal rights such as compensation and notice of transfer. Are such limited rights valid as India is a valid state, or it should try and protect the employees in a more comprehensive way? The U. K. and the U. S. A., relevantly provide certain set of rights, but Canada just like India have very limited rights to protect the interests of employees during the reconstruction of a company. Legislatively, India lack a comprehensive protection of employees but the discretion is with the judiciary to decide on the fairness of a scheme of reconstruction. The judiciary has to be pro-active enough to protect the interests of the working class of a company if the scheme of arrangement is taking away the rights of the workmen. The workmen appear before the court if they consider that the scheme is violating their rights.
References
The Companies Act, 2013, Sec. 230 (2) (c) r/w Sec. 230 (6)
Ibid, Sec. 235 (1)
The Companies Act, 2013
Supra 2
Supra 3
Act no. 18 of 2013
Ibid, Sec. 230 (7) (e)
Supra 4
Supra 7
Supra 4, Sec. 232 (3) (h)
[1975] 45 Comp Cas 248 (Guj)
The Companies Act, 1956 (Repealed)
Fincy Pellisserry, Corporate Restructuring: Who Cares for the Employees? , Indian Journal of
Industrial Relations , July 2012, Vol. 48, No. 1 (July 2012), pg. 30
Supra 3, Sec. 231 (1) (b)
[1995] 83 Comp Cas 1 (Bom)
Supra 14
[1988] 63 Comp Cas 233 (Bom)
Act No. 14 of 1947
Ibid, Sec. 2 (s), definition of workmen
Supra 4, Sec. 230
Ibid, Sec. 237
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Sec. 25FF (1)
1991 (63) FLR 216
Supra 14, Pg. 34
Kenneth Lehn, Public Policy Towards Corporate Restructuring, Business Economics , April 1990,
Vol. 25, No. 2 (April 1990), pg. 30
Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 1974; a federal law of the USA that has set minimum
standards for the voluntarily established health and retirement plans in the private industry.
Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification, 1988; a federal law of the USA that provides with a
minimum of 60 days for mass layoffs and planned closings.
Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 1967; a federal law of the USA that protects persons of age
and above and provides equal employment opportunities.
Alfred W. Blumrosen , Ruth G. Blumrosen, Marco Carmignani & Thomas Daly, Downsizing and
Employee Rights, 50 RUTGERS L. REV. 943 (1998). Pg. 953-954.
Dibra, M. (2021). Employee Participation Rights During Company Restructuring: Lessons Learned
from the “Capability for Voice” in British Law. Revue générale de droit, 51(1), Pg. 253
Simon Deakin & Aristea Koukiadaki, Capability Theory, Employee Voice, and Corporate
Restructuring: Evidence from U.K. Case Studies, 33 COMP. LAB. L. & POL'y J. 427 (2012). Pg. 428
Ibid, Pg. 255-256
Directive 2002/14/EC - informing and consulting employees
https://osha.europa.eu/en/legislation/directives/directive-2002-14-ec-establishing-a-general-
framework-for-informing-and-consulting-employees-in-the-european-community
2004 No. 3426, (UK)
Supra 24, Pg. 254
[2004] IRLR 400
Article 23 (1), ICE 2004
Supra 24, Pg. 263