Confusion Over Confessions: Admissibility of Confessions Under the Customs Act and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act
Keywords:
Confession, Indian evidence act, admissibility, and police officerAbstract
This article delves into the admissibility of confessions in the context of the Customs Act, 1962, and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) within the framework of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (IEA). The discussion begins by establishing the significance of analysing confessions in economic offences. Such offences cause substantial societal harm. The article also highlights the legislative and judicial justifications for lowering the threshold of admissibility for confessions under the Customs Act and PMLA, which are departures from the IEA. The IEA is also outlined, since Sections 24 to 29 govern the admissibility of confessions. The analysis then shifts to the admissibility of confessions under the Customs Act. It emphasises how post-Independence interpretations narrow the definition of “police officers” under Section 25 IEA, making Customs Officers distinct and allowing for the admissibility of
confessions made before them. However, Section 24 IEA still applies to prevent confessions obtained through inducement, threat, or promise. The article examines confessions under PMLA (Prevention of Money Laundering Act), highlighting the unique role of the Enforcement Directorate (ED). It discusses the broad powers granted to the ED under Section 50 PMLA and how they differ from typical police officers. Confessions obtained by the ED are considered admissible because the accused is not treated as such under Sections 24 to 25 IEA. The article also briefly touches upon the constitutionality of PMLA confessions in relation to Article 20(3) of the Constitution, asserting that these confessions must still be subject to cross-examination. Thus, the article raises concerns about the exceptional treatment of economic offenses and argues against derogating from fundamental principles of justice and evidence
in the name of combating economic crimes. It calls for a balanced approach that respects the rights of the accused while addressing the seriousness of economic offenses.
References
1. The Customs Act 1962. [Online] Available at https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/ 2475?view_type=browse&sam_handle=123456789/1362 [Accessed on October 2023] Confusion Over Confessions Chaitanya Gupta
2. The Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002. [Online] Available at https://www.indiacode. nic.in/bitstream/123456789/2036/1/A2003-15.pdf [Accessed on October 2023]
3. The Indian Evidence Act 1872. [Online] Available at https://www.indiacode.nic.in/ bitstream/123456789/15351/1/iea_1872.pdf [Accessed on October 2023]
4. Memon Z, Naik C, Bhatkoti P. India: Confessional statements and their admissibility . [Online] Available at https://www.mondaq.com/india/money- laundering/1125580/confessional-statements-under-pmla-and-their-admissibility [Accessed on October 2023]
5. Wani S. After a decline in Covid -hit 2020, economic offences increase 19% in 2021 . [Online] Available at https://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/after-a-decline-in-covid- hit-2020-economic-offences-increase-19-in-2021-122083000797_1.html [Accessed on October 2023]
6. National Crimes Record Bureau. Crimes in India: 2012-2015 (Chapter 9: Economic Offences).
7. Team C. NCRB Report 2021: Crime In India. [Online] Available from: https://www.clearias. com/ncrb-report-2021/.
8. State of Bihar v. Amit Kumar (2017) 13 S.C.C. 751.
9. State of Gujarat v. Mohanlal Jitamalji Porwal (1987) 2 S.C.C. 364. [Online] Available at https://indiankanoon.org/doc/90919629/ [Accessed on October 2023]
10. P. Chidambaran v. Directorate of Enforcement (2019) 9 S.C.C. 24. [Online] Available at https://indiankanoon.org/doc/42679608/ [Accessed on October 2023]
11. The Indian Evidence Act 1872, ss. 17-31. [Online] Available at https://www.writinglaw.com/ section-17-31-of-indian-evidence-act-chapter-ii/ [Accessed on October 2023]
12. The Indian Evidence Act 1872, ss. 24-26. [Online] Available at https://www.indiacode.nic.in/ bitstream/123456789/4218/1/THE-INDIAN-EVIDENCE-ACT-1872.pdf [Accessed on October 2023]
13. The Indian Evidence Act 1872, ss. 27 -29. [Online] Available at https://www.indiacode. nic.in/bitstream/123456789/15351/1/iea_1872.pdf [Accessed on October 2023]
14. Hidayatullah M, Manohar VR. The law of evidence. Delhi, India: Wadhwa and Company; 1987.
15. Queen-Empress v. Babu Lal (1884) 6 All. 509 FB; and Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs, Bengal v. Bhaju Majhi (1929) 57 Cal. 1062. [Online] Available at https://indiankanoon. org/doc/1474388/ [Accessed on October 2023]
16. Dhanapati De v. Emperor (1944) 2 Cal. 312. [Online] Available at https://www.casemine. com/judgement/in/5ac5e2f34a932619d903b5f5 [Accessed on October 2023]
17. Om Prakash v. State of Uttar Pradesh A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 409. [Online] Available at https://indian kanoon.org/doc/573959/ [Accessed on October 2023]
18. Palvinder Kaur, (1953) Pun. 107; and Supra Note 4, at 66. [Online] Available at https://indian kanoon.org/doc/96660/ [Accessed on October 2023]
19. A. Nagesia v. Bihar State A.I.R. 1966 S.C. 119. [Online] Available at https://indian kanoon.org/doc/924340/ [Accessed on October 2023]
20. Emperor v. Narayen (1907) 9 Bom. L.R. 789. [Online] Available at https://indian kanoon.org/doc/1968750/ [Accessed on October 2023]
21. Narayen Singh v. Madhya Pradesh A.I.R. 1985 S.C. 1678. [Online] Available at https://indian kanoon.org/doc/416055/ [Accessed on October 2023]
22. Shankaria v. Rajasthan A.I.R. 1978 S.C. 1248. [Online] Available at https://indian kanoon.org/doc/677948/#:~:text=The%20learned%20Sessions%20Judge%20foun d,the%20other%20evidence%20on%20record. [Accessed on October 2023]
23. Emperor v. Bhagi (1906) 8 Bom. L.R. 697. [Online] Available at https://indian kanoon.org/doc/1337310/ [Accessed on October 2023]
24. State of Uttar Pradesh v. Deoman A.I.R.1960 S.C. 1125. [Online] Available at https://indiankanoon.org/doc/481284/ [Accessed on October 2023]
25. Emperor v. Bhagwandas Bisesar (1940) 42 Bom. L.R.938.
26. Emperor v. Kutub Bux (1929) 57 Cal. 488. [Online] Available at https://indian kanoon.org/doc/111517/ [Accessed on October 2023]
27. The Queen v. Croydon (1846) 2 Cox. 67.
28. Jas Bahadur Thapa v. King-Emperor (1929) 8 Ran. 52.
29. Queen v. Hurribole Chunder Ghose (1876) 1 Cal. 207. [Online] Available at https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1055970/ [Accessed on October 2023]
30. Queen-Empress v. Salemuddin Sheik (1899) 26 Cal. 569. https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1261375/ [Accessed on October 2023]
31. Emperor v. Dinshaw Driver (1928) 31 Bom. L.R. 49. [Online] Available at https://indian kanoon.org/doc/687866/ [Accessed on October 2023]
32. Ibrahim Ahmed v. King-Emperor (1931) 58 Cal. 1260; and Emperor v. Nanoo (1926) 28 Bom. L.R. 1196. [Online] Available at https://indiankanoon.org/doc/859987/ [Accessed on October 2023]
33. Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, s.173. [Online] Available at https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1412034/#:~:text=173.,be%20completed%20witho ut%20unnecessary%20delay. [Accessed on October 2023]
34. State of Punjab v. Barkat Ram A.I.R. 1962 S.C. 276; Badaku Joti v. State of Mysore A.I.R. 1966 S.C. 1746; and Hari Rachu v. The State (1971) 73 Bom. L.R. 891.
35. Queen-Empress v. Babu Lal (1884) 6 All. 509.
36. www.casemine.com. (2023). Queen Empress v. Salemuddin Sheik And Ors., Calcutta High Court, Judgment, Law, casemine.com. [Online] Available from: https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5721afae607dba2e3c889734.
37. Mulk Raj v. State of Uttar Pradesh A.I.R. 1959 S.C. 902. [Online] Available at https://indiankanoon.org/doc/356303/ [Accessed on October 2023]
38. Udai Bhan v. State of Uttar Pradesh A.I.R. 1962 S.C. 1116; Ramkishan Mithanlal v. State of Bombay A.I.R. 1955 S.C. 104. [Online] Available at https://indiankanoon.org/doc/684676/ [Accessed on October 2023]
39. Palvinder Singh Kaur v. State of Punjab A.I.R. 1952 S.C. 354. [Online] Available at https://indiankanoon.org/doc/96660/ [Accessed on October 2023]
40. Constitution of India 1950, art. 20(3).
41. State of Bombay v. Kathi Kalu Oghad, A.I.R. 1961 S.C. 808. [Online] Available at https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1626264/
42. Lachman Singh v. State A.I.R. 1952 S.C. 167; Mohd. Abdul Hafeez v. State of A.P. (1983) 1 S.C.C. 143; and Pulukuri Kottaya v. Emperor A.I.R. 1947 P.C. 67.
43. State of Uttar Pradesh v. Deoman Upadhyaya A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 1125. [Online] Available at https://indiankanoon.org/doc/481284/ [Accessed on October 2023]
44. Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, s.162. [Online] Available at https://indiankanoon.org/doc/ 523607/ [Accessed on October 2023]
45. Raja Ram v. State of Bihar A.I.R. 1964 S.C. 828. [Online] Available at https://indiankanoon.org/ doc/1409644/ [Accessed on October 2023]
46. State of Punjab v. Barkat Ram A.I.R. 1962 S.C. 276. [Online] Available at https://indiankanoon. org/doc/1090657/ [Accessed on October 2023] Confusion Over Confessions Chaitanya Gupta
47. The Customs Act 1962, s.108. [Online] Available at https://indiankanoon.org/doc/877314/ [Accessed on October 2023]
48. Ramesh Chandra Mehta v. State of West Bengal A.I.R. 1970 S.C. 940. [Online] Available at https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1355660/#:~:text=Counsel%20for%20Mehta%20c ontended%20that,has%20opportunities%20which%20a%20police [Accessed on October 2023]
49. Assistant Collector, Bangalore v. C. Fernandez (1982) 3 S.C.C. 512. [Online] Available at https:// www.the- laws.com/Encyclopedia/Browse/Case?CaseId=001891623000&Title=ASSISTANT- COLLECTOR-CENTRAL-EXCISE-BANGALORE-Vs.-C-FERNANDES [Accessed on October 2023]
50. Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, s.173. [Online] Available at https://indiankanoon.org/doc/ 1412034/#:~:text=173.,be%20completed%20without%20unnecessary%20delay. [Accessed on October 2023]
51. Percy Rustam Basta v. State of Maharashtra 1971 A.I.R. 1087. [Online] Available at https://indiankanoon.org/doc/677447/ [Accessed on October 2023]
52. Constitution of India. (2023). Article 20: Protection in respect of conviction for offences. Constitution of India. [Online] Available from: https://www.constitutionofindia.net/articles/article- 20-protection-in-respect-of-conviction-for-offences/.
53. Fiuindia.gov.in. (2016). FIU -India. [Online] Available from: https://fiuindia.gov.in/files/AML_ Legislation/pmla_2002.html.
54. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Arrangement of Sections Chapter II Constitution of Criminal Courts and Offices. [Online] Available from: https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/ 123456789/15272/1/the_code_of_criminal_procedure%2C_1973.pdf.
55. The Indian Penal Code 1860, ss. 191, 193, 197 and 228.
56. Rohit Tandon v. The Enforcement Directorate (2018) 11 S.C.C. 46. [Online] Available at https://indiankanoon.org/doc/13208976/ [Accessed on October 2023]
57. Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy v. Central Bureau of Investigation (2013) 7 S.C.C. 439. [Online] Available at https://indiankanoon.org/doc/183369852/ [Accessed on October 2023]
58. Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Limited v. Assistant Director of Enforcement Directorate (2016) 3 A.L.T. October 2023]
59. Vijay Madanlal Choudhury v. Union of India 2021 S.C.C. OnLine S.C. 1048. [Online] Available at https://indiankanoon.org/doc/14485072/ [Accessed on October 2023]
60. Ramakrishnan N. Undue process: here’s what‘s wrong with the Supreme Court’s PMLA Judgment. [Online] Available at https://thewire.in/law/undue-process-heres-whats-wrong-with- the-supreme-courts-pmla-judgment [Accessed on October 2023]
61. Ripen Kumar v. Department of Customs 2001 Cri. L.J. 1288. [Online] Available at https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1108942/ [Accessed on October 2023]
62. IJLLR. (2021). Law. Self Incrimination Under Article 20(3) of The Constitution of India. [Online] Available from: https://www.ijllr.com/post/self -incrimination-under-article-20-3-of-the- constitution-of-india#:~:text=It%20is%20based%20on%20the,under%20Article%2020(3).
63. Nandini Sathpathy v. P.L. Dani A.I.R. 1978 S.C. 1025; reaffirmed M.P. Sharma v. Satish Chandra A.I.R. 1954 S.C. 300. [Online] Available at https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1938988/ [Accessed on October 2023]
64. The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985. [Online] Available at https://dor.gov.in/sites/default/files/Narcotic-Drugs-and-Psychotropic- Substances-Act-1985.pdf [Accessed on October 2023]
65. Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu (2021) 4 S.C.C. 1. [Online] Available at https://www.livelaw.in/columns/tofan-singhs-case-opens-up-new-horizons-in-the- law-of-confessions-in-criminal-trials-214790 [Accessed on October 2023]
