The legislation’s impact on Crypto Currency in India
Keywords:
Advantages, Crypto currency, Challenges, financial market, regulation, virtual money.Abstract
The concept of crypto currency is a little hard to accept, but it is easy to use. It is considered difficult because it is entirely different from our conventional currencies. Crypto currency is a digital or virtual or internet currency that uses cryptography for security. Crypto currency has created unmatched changes in the financial market having both positive and negative contributions. This is a conceptual paper tries to study the different aspects of crypto currencies, starting with their history, types, its working, advantages and disadvantages, challenges and opportunities. This led to some countries banning it or making it illegal, while some others remained observant and the rest worked out ways to tax and regulate its operations. Due to the rapid development of information and communication technologies, many activities in our daily life have been merged online and they become more flexible and more effective. The use of virtual currency has become widespread in many different systems in recent years. This paper investigates the user's expectations of the future of crypto currency. It also explores the users' confidence of dealing with crypto currency in a time that using such virtual money is not fully controlled and regulated.
References
1. Carson B, Romanelli G, Walsh P, Zhumaev A 2018. Blockchain beyond the hype: what is the strategic business value? McKinsey&Company. Digital McKinsey (June).
2. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 1989;13(3). doi: 10.2307/249008.
3. J. A New Coinage: can Bitcoin, the gl obal online digital currency, be the precursor of a new monetary system? Econ Pol Wkly. 2013;48(38):77–8.
4. Böhme R, Christin N, Edelman B, Moore T. Bitcoin: economics, technology, and governance. J Econ Perspect. 2015;29(2):213–38. doi: 10.1257/jep.29.2.213.
5. Luther WJ. Bitcoin and the future of digital payments. SSRN Journal. 2016;20(3):397 –404. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2631314. The Legislation’s Impact on Cryptocurrency in India Monika Jain
6. Harwick C. Cryptocurrency and the problem of intermediation. Independent Rev. 2016;20(4):569–88.
7. Ivaschenko AI. Using cryptocurrency in the activities of Ukrainian small and Medium Enterprises in order to improve their investment attractiveness. Probl Econ. 2016;3:267–73.
8. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Behav Hum Decis Proc. 1991;50(2):179 –211. doi: 10.1016/0749–5978(91)90020-T.
9. Sánchez-Torres JA, Canada FA, Sandoval AV, Alzate JS. E -banking in Colombia: factors favouring its acceptance, online trust and government support. Int J Bank Mark. 2018;36(1):170 –
10. Lusardi A, Mitchell OS. The economic importance of financial literacy: theory and evidence. J Econ Lit. 2014;52(1):5–44. doi: 10.1257/jel.52.1.5, PMID 28579637.
11. Warsame MH, Ireri EM. Moderation effect on mobile microfinance services in Kenya: an extended UTAUT model. J Behav Exp Fin. 2018;18:67–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jbef.2018.01.008.
12. Section 35A & section 36(1)(a) of Banking Regulation Act, 1949
13. Section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949
14. Section 45JA and 45L of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934
15. Section 10(2) & Section 18 of Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007
16. Internet and mobile association of India v. Reserve Bank of India 2020 SCC Online SC 275
17. Internet and mobile association of India v. Reserve Bank of India 2020 SCC Online SC 275
18. Article 19 (1)(G) of Constitution of India
19. Schaupp LC, Festa M. C ryptocurrency Adopt ion and the Road to Regulation. In: Proceedings of the 19th annual international conference on Digital Government Research: governance in the data age; 2018.
20. Federal Reserve. System. Fed Reserve Next Steps Payments Improv Journey. 2019.
21. Makanyeza C, Mutambayashata S. Consumers’ acceptance and use of plastic money in Harare, Zimbabwe: application of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology 2. Int J Bank Mark. 2018;36(2):379–92. doi: 10.1108/IJBM-03–2017–0044.
22. Krombholz K, Judmayer A, Gusenbauer M, Weippl E. The other side of the coin: user experiences with bitcoin security and privacy. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2017;9603:555–80. doi: 10.1007/978–3–662–54970–4_33.
23. The report of the Interministerial Committee dated February 28, 2019, Banning of Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill; 2019.
24. Exton J, Doidge F 2018. Cracking the Code on C ryptocurrency—ING Bank. ING International Survey Mobile Banking.
25. Felipe CM, Roldán JL, Leal -Rodríguez AL. Impact of organizational culture values on organizational agility; 2017.
26. Hastings JS, Madrian BC, Skimmyhorn WL. Financial literacy, financial education, and economic outcomes. Annu Rev Econom. 2013;5:347–73. doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-082312–125807, PMID 23991248.
27. Holub M, Johnson J. Bitcoin research across disciplines. Inf Soc. 2018;34(2):114 –26. doi: 10.1080/01972243.2017.1414094.
28. Lam LT, Lam MK. The association between financial literacy and problematic inter net shopping in a multinational sample. Addict Behav Rep. 2017;6:123 –7. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2017.10.002, PMID 29450247.
29. Shaikh AA, Glavee -Geo R, Karjaluoto H. How relevant are risk perceptions, effort, and performance expectancy in mobile banking adoption ? Int J E Bus Res. 2018;14(2):39 –60. doi: 10.4018/IJEBR.2018040103.
30. Stolper OA, Walter A. Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior. J Bus Econ. 2017;87(5):581–643. doi: 10.1007/s11573–017–0853–9.
31. Kim SY, Lee SH, Chi YD, Im ET, Gim GY. A study on the factors affecting the intention to use biometrics in payment services. Int J Bank Mark. 2018;36:170–83.
32. Hussain M, Mollik AT, Johns R, Rahman MS. M -payment adoption for bottom of pyramid segment: an empirical investigation. Int J Bank Mark. 2 019;37(1):362–81. doi: 10.1108/IJBM - 01–2018–0013.
33. Moon Y, Hwang J. Crowd funding as an alternative means for funding sustainable appropriate technology: acceptance determinants of backers; 2018.
34. Turner A, Samantha ASM, Irwin M, Turner A, Samantha A, Irwin M. Bitcoin transactions? A digital discovery of illicit activity on the blockchain. J Financ Crime. 2018;25(1):109 –30. doi: 10.1108/JFC-12–2016–0078.
35. J Walton A, A. Johnston K. Exploring perceptions of bitcoin adoption: the South African virtual community perspective. Interdiscip J Inf Knowl Manag. 2018;13:165–82. doi: 10.28945/4080.
36. Natarajan H, Krause SK, Gradstein HL. Distributed ledger technology (DLT) and blockchain. World Bank Group; 2017.
