The Resolution Risk Premium: An Analysis of thePre-Packaged Insolvency Resolution Process (PPIRP)Framework’s Impact on an MSME’s Access toAffordable Credit
Keywords:
Resolution Risk Premium, Pre-Packaged Insolvency Resolution Process (PPIRP), MSME Credit Access, Debtor-in-Possession vs Creditor-in-Control, Timeline Risk, Information AsymmetryAbstract
The Pre-Packaged Insolvency Regime in India was developed for MSMEs to provide a speedier, less disruptive, and cost-effective alternative to formal insolvency, with the implicit intent of reducing the “resolution risk premium” inherent in MSME lending. However, due to the structural and procedural flaws inherent in the PPIRP framework, this implicit cost of credit has persisted whereas, in some cases, it has increased also. The hybrid model, in which debtors retain operating control but lose decisionmaking powers, generates agency risks, moral hazard, and monitoring inefficiencies that erode confidence among lenders. Moreover, the legislatively guaranteed 120-day resolution timeline has proved illusory due to judicial delays, objections raised at the pre-admission stage, and inconsistent interpretations by various tribunals. This has enhanced timeline risk, which is one of the key components of the resolution risk premium. Simultaneously, the recovery risk remains high due to the negotiations-based approach toward base resolution plans, the legally binding prioritization of operational creditors, and the apprehensions relating to accountability that financial institutions face when approving haircuts. Ultimately, these systemic weaknesses discourage creditor participation and hinder the objective of affordable credit flow into the MSME sector, which accounts for nearly onethird of India’s GDP and is the anchor for employment generation. Restoring predictability and
efficiency, thereby reducing the embedded risk premium and strengthening MSME credit markets and contributing to broader financial and economic stability, calls for a calibrated recasting of statutory timelines, judicial intervention thresholds, and creditor protection mechanisms.
References
1. Gahoi K, Krishnan A. Comparative analysis of key provisions of corporate insolvency resolution process and pre-packaged insolvency resolution process under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Int J Law Manag Human. 2021;4:1238.
2. Ram Mohan MP, Raj V. Pre-packaged insolvency regulation: What can India learn from the United Kingdom and the United States? Am Bankr Inst Law Rev. 2021;29:231.
3. Ministry of Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises, supra note 1, at 3.
4. Kamalnath A, Kaul A. Adding mediation to India’s corporate resolution process. Int Insolv Rev. 2022;31:163.
5. Ibid.
6. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Ordinance, No. 3 of 2021, § 1, Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Pt II, Sec 1 (Apr 4, 2021) (India).
7. Roy J. Debtor-in-possession style of insolvency resolution: Developments in India. Pratt’s J Bankr Law. 2021;17:383.
8. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, § 54A, No. 31 Acts of Parliament, 2016 (India); The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, § 54K, No. 31 Acts of Parliament, 2016 (India).
9. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, § 54D, No. 31 Acts of Parliament, 2016 (India).
10. PPIRP Information Brochure. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India. Available from: https://ibbi.gov.in/uploads/whatsnew/a650764a464bc60fe330bce464d5607d.pdf [cited 2025 Aug 24].
11. Budhiraja JK. Pre-packaged insolvency resolution process for MSME. Manag Account J. 2021;56(5):82–87.
12. Chaudhary D. A continued necessity of PPIRP under the IBC 2016 post Covid. Int J Law Manag Human. 2024;7:1859.
13. Pre-Packs for MSMEs: A Positive Step with Implementation Hurdles. 2021 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 59.
14. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, § 54H, No. 31 Acts of Parliament, 2016 (India).
15. Arun Kumar Jagatramka v. Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. (2021) 7 SCC 474.
16. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, § 54J, No. 31 Acts of Parliament, 2016 (India).
17. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, § 54O, No. 31 Acts of Parliament, 2016 (India).
18. Pre-Packaged Insolvency Resolution Regime - Need of the Hour. Scholasticus. 2021;9(2):1.
19. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, § 54D, No. 31 Acts of Parliament, 2016 (India).
20. Sharma R, Arora B. Corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) under IBC: An analysis of effectiveness and challenge. Indian J Law Leg Res. 2025;7(3):1104–1119.
21. Krrish Realtech (P) Ltd., In re. 2021 SCC OnLine NCLAT 429.
22. Kethos Tiles (P) Ltd., In re. 2025 SCC OnLine NCLT 2519.
23. India Spawns the Pre-Packaged Insolvency for MSMEs in Motion - The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2021. 2022 SCC OnLine Blog OpEd 18.
24. Examining the Pre-Packaged Insolvency Resolution Process in India. JILI. 2023;65:211.
25. Tripathi U. A critical analysis of India’s pre-pack regime for MSMEs. Int Insolv Rev. 2024;33(1):89–110.
26. Section 54A, 54K, Supra note 9, at 5.
27. Kumar S. Pre-packaged insolvency-A much needed value addition to IBC 2016. Asian J Res Bank Finance. 2021;11(9):1–13.
28. Ibid.
29. Ravi A. Prepacks under the IBC: A tussle between speed and fair process. In: Insolvency and Bankruptcy Reforms in India. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2022. p. 121–135.
30. Xie B. Comparative Insolvency Law: The Pre-Pack Approach in Corporate Rescue. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2016.
31. Lund A. Cooperative difference in insolvency proceedings: Pre-pack sales, fiduciary duty and the oppression remedy. McGill Law J. 2023;68(2):161–201.
32. Frisby S. Insolvency law and insolvency practice: Principles and pragmatism diverge? Curr Leg Probl. 2011;64(1):349–397.
33. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, § 240A, No. 31 Acts of Parliament, 2016 (India); The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, § 29A, No. 31 Acts of Parliament, 2016 (India).
34. Ibid.
35. GCCL Infrastructure and Projects Ltd., In re. 2009 SCC OnLine SEBI-OCM 68.
36. Krrish Realtech (P) Ltd., In re. 2021 SCC OnLine NCLAT 429.
37. CHD Developers Ltd. v. D.B. Corpn. Ltd. 2021 SCC OnLine NCLT 5781.
38. Kethos Tiles (P) Ltd., In re. 2025 SCC OnLine NCLT 2519.
