Discharged and Committal for Trial under the Cameroon Criminal Procedure Code
Keywords:
Discharged-Committal for Trial- Cameroon -Criminal -Procedure -CodeAbstract
Today’s rules of Criminal Procedure in Cameroon are expressed in the Harmonized Criminal Procedure Code. Before this code, there usually exists the Criminal Procedure Ordinance, being the Law Governing aspects of Criminal Procedure in Anglophone Cameroon and the Code d’Instruction Criminelle and the French Code of Criminal Procedure of 1808, which was the major source of criminal procedure. Thus, both the adversarial elements of the English system and the inquisitorial pre-trial investigation of the French system that characterized both the Criminal Procedure Ordinance and the Code d’Instruction Criminelle, have been harmonized under a single Criminal Procedure Code, also known as “the code”. It should be noted that, the accused under the English system was not question or otherwise involved in the procedure between charge and trial. This is contrary to the French and German system which aimed at establishing the truth and to bring offenders to justice. This therefore makes an analysis for the basis of discharge and committal for trial at the level of preliminary investigation under the Cameroon Criminal Procedure Code. Moreover, the Code obliges the Examining Magistrate to carry out Preliminary investigation in all felonious cases, but however makes it discretionary in simple and misdemeanour offences. This paper therefore purports to examine discharged and committal for trial as it is under the Harmonized Criminal Procedure Code of Cameroon, bringing out strictly the bases for which the Examining Magistrate derives their decision to either discharge or commit an accused for trail. This paper seeks to examine discharge and committal for trial under the code, which is understandably, the law in Cameroon today.
References
1. BRYAN, A. GARNER, Black’s Law Dictionary, 9 th Edition, St Pual, MNN, USA, West Publishing Co, 2004, at. p. 530
2. R. V. Galbraith , where the test for determining whether there was a no case to answer was first reached.
3. Dashaco J. T., “ nolle prosequi under the Cameroonian criminal Procedure Code ” in Read ing in the Cameroon Criminal Procedure Code. 2007, PUA, at. P. 106
4. Section 6 of law N° 211/027 of 14 Dec. 2011 on the Judicial Organisation of Courts in Cameroon, amending and supplementing law N° 2006/015 of 26 Dec 2006 also amending the 1972 law.
5. J. Hatchard et al., supra, note 6, at P. 200
6. Sections 256(4&5) of the CCPC respectively.
7. Simon T. T., supra, note 4 at p. 78
8. Dashaco John T., supra note 11, at p. 83.
9. Section 258 (1) of the CPC
10. Cited by Hon. Justice M.E. ANENIH on appeal, in Commissioner of Police V. Engineer Akin Olusina , 2015 reported at the Abuja High Court Territorial Division.
11. R. V. Galbraith (1981) 1 WLR 1039.
12. The preamble of the Cameroon constitution, following Law N°.2008/001 of 14 th April 2008, to amend and supplement some provisions of Law N°. 96/06 of 18 January 1996, to amend the Constitution of 2nd June 1972.
13. (1999) 7 NWLR (PT.611)
14. Ewang S. A., Nah Thomas F., “lecture notes on Criminal Procedure”, level 2, University of Dschang, Faculty of Law and political science, 2012-2013, at P. 9
15. Tantoh-Azuh Crysanthus, “Due Process in Criminal Trial under the Cameroon Criminal Procedure Code ” in Reading in the Cameroon criminal procedure Code., 2007, PUA, at P. 143.
16. Section 128(1) of the CP C. Also, Nah Thomas F., “ The Protection of the Maxim “Innocent until Proven Guilty” by the Cameroon Criminal Procedure Code” in Reading in the Cameroon Criminal Procedure Code, 2007, PUA, at p. 246
17. (1935) A.C 462. Also, Tajudeen Alabic V. The State (1993) NWLR (Pt 307) 511 at 531.
18. Tantoh-Azuh Crysanthus, supra note 24 at p. 143.
19. (1956) N. L. R. L., Also, DABOH V. State (1979) 5 SC 197.
20. (1971) 1 N. N. L. R. 24
21. T. Akinola Aguda, (1966), “The Law of Evidence in Nigeria”, 4 th Edition, African University Pr ess, Lagos: Nigeria, at Pp. 227-229.
22. Tantoh-Azuh C. supra note 24 at P. 145.
23. The witness being deposed is called the “deponent.”
24. Section 180(1) of the CPC.
25. Simon T. T. supra note 4. Citing Rupet Cross, (1979), Cross on Evidence, London, Butterworths, P. 37.
26. Section 331 (1, 2 & 3) respectively of the CPC.
27. Ibid at p. 67. Also, Section 175 (1&2) of the CPC.
28. A witness shall with head uncovered and his bare right hand raised, take the following oath “I swear to speak the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.”
29. Simon T. T., supra note 4, at p. 70
30. Dambazu, A.B., Criminology and Criminal Justice, Nigeria Defence Academy Press, Kaduna, Nigeria, 1999, p.99
31. Article VIII, of the Federal Rules of Evidence, 2019 Edition, Mechigan Legal Publishing, USA, 2019.
32. Eric S. Kobrick, “ The Ex -Post Facto Prohibition and the Exercise of Universal Jurisdiction over International Crimes ”, Columbia Law review, Vol. 87, No. 7 (Nov., 1987), PP. 1515-1538. NJCL (2019) 15-27 © Law Journals 2019. All Rights Reserved Page 26
33. The Cameroon Constitution op. cit.
34. Amadou Monkaree, “ the ri ghts of of accused person in Cameroonian Criminal proceedings” in Reading in the Cameroon Criminal Procedure Code, 2007, PUA, at p. 215.
35. Ibid. citing Chukkol, K. S., The Law of Crimes in Nigeria, Amadu Bello University Press, 1988, at p.36.
36. Ibid. Cited, (1985) 16 NSCC (Pt. 1) 224
37. (1993) INWLR (Pt. 269) 276.
38. Amadou Monkaree, supra note 46 at p. 216
39. Buckland, W.W., A Text-Book of Roman Law from Augustus to Justinian, 3 rd Edition, 1963 Cambridge: Cambridge UP. Pp. 695-6.
40. Chukkol K.S. op. cit. p. 36.
41. Dashaco John T., op. cit. at p. 88.
42. Connelly V. Director (1964) AC 1254.
43. Amadou Monkaree, op. cit. at p. 217.
44. Section460 (1&2) of the CPC.
45. Section Chukkol, K.S. op. cit. at p. 36 as cited by Amadou Monkaree op. cit. at p. 218.
46. (1980) 1 LRLR Vol. 1 at p. 128
47. John J. Moore, Jr., “ Problems with forgiveness: Granting Amnesty under the Arias Pla n in Nicaragua and El Salvador”, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 43, No. 3 (Feb. 1991), pp. 733-777.
48. Dashaco John T., op. cit. at p.87
49. Affaire chankap c/ MP et Kuindjue neé Tabet Ngatchou Lucienne, arret n° 94/P du 6 Fevrier, 1986, C.L.R. 146.
50. Dashaco John, T., supra note 11 at p. 87
51. Section 63 of the Criminal Procedure Code., Also Section 73(3) of the Cameroon Penal Code.
52. Section 65 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
53. Section 21 of the Cameroon Pena Code., Offences shall be classified as felonies, misdemeanuor and simple offences according to the principal penalties provided for them.
54. Section 65(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
55. Section 65(4), ibid
56. Section 65(5), Ibid
57. Hilmiton V. The King, (1917) 54 S.C.R. 331
58. Mack Joseph, “ Nullum tempus: governmental immunity to statutes of limitation, laches, and statutes of repose”. 2006-04-01, Defense Counsel Journal. Retrieved on 2019-11-01.
59. Section 66, Ibid. Time shall start to run afresh if one or more of the following acts should occur: the lodging of a complaint, written orders issued by the legal department instituting measures of investigations, processes served by bailiff, reports of police investigations, court processes, hearing of the parties and witnesses during preliminary in quiry or in court, interlocutory rulings and declarations of appeal.
60. Dashaco John, T., op. cit. at p. 88
61. Section 62(1) (h), of the CPC.
62. A. S. Hornby, Oxford Advanced Leaner’s Dictionary, 2010, 8 th Edition, United Kingdom, Oxford University Press
63. Section 62 (2) (a), of the CPC.
64. Ibid, Section 62 (2) (e).
65. Ibid, Section 62 (2)(b).
66. (1981) 1 N.W.L.R pt. 5.
67. (2006) SCSL-04-14-T, ICL 657.
68. Anna Mumford, “ Saving Justice when an accused Dies: Case OO2 at the ECCC”, 2012, Albany Law School Review.
69. Bon Ltd V. Muri., (1998) 2 NWLR pt. 536 C.A.
70. Section 323 of the Penal Code.
71. Section 64(1) of the CPC
72. Calderbank v. Calderbank, (1976) 2 All E.R. 333
73. Dashaco John T., op. cit.
74. Ibid, at p. 100 NJCL (2019) 15-27 © Law Journals 2019. All Rights Reserved Page 27 Cite this Article Nana Charles Nguindip Njulefac Protinus N. under the Cameroon . National Journal of Criminal Law. 2019; 2(2): 15- 27p.
