EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATES’ POWER TO MAINTAIN LAW AND ORDER
Keywords:
Executive Magistrate; Law and Order; Maintenance of Peace; Judicial powers of the Executive; Code of Criminal Procedure.Abstract
The constitution recognises that the judiciary has to be separated from the executive; based on the principle that an autonomous judiciary may better administer justice. This separation is also recognised in the Code of Criminal Procedure, which provides for two types of magistrates. The Executive Magistrate, as the name suggests is not concerned with judicial functions per se, but police and administrative functions. The focus of this article is powers of the Executive Magistrate in discharging the function of maintaining law and order. Maintaining of law and order is wide term encompassing a multitude of facts and circumstances. Therefore, to deal with such a multitude of facts and circumstances, vesting of wide powers may be a necessary evil. However, inherent limitations on such powers have been incorporated, as exercise of such powers can have severe effects on personal liberty and affect the rights of persons. In this context, this article systematically analyses the powers – of safe keeping for preserving peace, dispersal of unlawful assemblies, removing nuisance and apprehended threat; under the overarching umbrella of maintaining law and order. Relevant criminal law and constitutional principles have been highlighted at appropriate sections as well.
References
1. Art. 50, Constitution of India, 1950.
2. Law Commission of India. on Reforms of the Judicial Administration . India: Ministry of Law and Justice; 1948. Vol II, 850p. Report No. 14.
3. Law Commission of India. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1889. India: Ministry of Law and Justice; 1967. 13p. Report No. 37.
4. K.N. Chandrasekharan Pillai, editor. R.V. Kelkar’s Criminal Procedure. Lucknow: Eastern Book Company; 2015.
5. Sec. 20(1), Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
6. Sec. 20(2), Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
7. Sec. 20(4), Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
8. Sec. 20(4-A), Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
9. Law Commission of India, The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898. India: Ministry of Law and Justice; 1969. Vol I, 13p. Report No. 41.
10. Madhu Limaye v. Sub -Divisional Magistrte, Mongyhr, 3 SCC 746.
11. Sudipto Sarkar and V R Manohar, editors. S.C. Sarkar’s The Code of Criminal Procedure, Vol I . Nagpur: Lexis Nexis Butterworths Wadhwa; 2012. Executive magistrates’ power to maintain law and order Hitesh Kumar A. NJCL (2018) 43-53 © Law Journals 2018. All Rights Reserved Page 52
12. Rajendra Singh Pathania v. State (NCT of Delhi, 2011 13 SCC 329.
13. Ram Narain Singh v. State of Bihar, 1972 2 SCC 532; Deoballam S ingh v. Gorakhnath Singh, 1947 Cri LJ 703.
14. Medha Patkar v. State of M.P, 2008 Cri LJ 47 (MP).
15. Singh Pathania v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2011 13 SCC 329.
16. Keshar Kumar v. State, 2008 Cri LJ 233 (Del).
17. Rama Chandra Jena v. Muralidar Onjha, 1988 Cri LK 218 (Ori ); M.C.S Rao v. State of Mysore, 1972 Cri LJ 405, 406 (Mys).
18. Tavinder Kumar v. State, 1990 Cri LJ 40 (Del).
19. C.S. Reddy v. State of A.P., 1973 Cri LJ 1713, 1715 (AP).
20. Ram Mehar Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2011 14 SCC 732.
21. Babaji Sahoo v State of Orissa, 1989 Cri LJ 1872 (Ori).
22. Muthuswami Cehttiar, re, 1940 41 Cri LJ 238, 241; Tulisibala Rakhit v. N.N. Khosal, 1953 Cri LJ 344, 346.
23. Reddy Channabasavanna v. State of Mysore; 1973 Cri LJ 1049, 1050; R. Ramaswamy v. B. Subramanian, 1983 Cri LJ 761, 762 (AP).
24. Amit Pal v Anil Kumar, 1978 Cri LJ 1066 1068 (Pat).
25. Mahadevaswamy v. State of Karnatak a, 1989 Cri LJ 765 (Kant).
26. Kadir Ali v. Wahab Ali, 1980 Cri LJ 507, 509 (Gau).
27. Sec. 300, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
28. A.B. Chandra Reddy v. Revenue Inspector, 1980 Cri LJ 1169m 1170 (AP).
29. Noidu v. State of Kerala, 1982 Cri LJ 2293 2298 (Ker) (FB).
30. Brij Gopal Chaturvedi v State of M.P., 1997 SCC 569.
31. Law Commission of India. supra note 3; 327.
32. Joint Committee Report. XIV. 2004.
33. Karam Shingh v. Hardayal Singh, 1079 Cri LJ 1211, 1214 (P&H).
34. State of Karnataka v. B. Padmanabha Beliya, 1992 Cri LJ 634 (Kant).
35. Law Commission of India. supra note 3; 330.
36. Bhaba Kanta v. Ramchandra, 1987 Cri LJ 1155, 1157 (P&H).
37. Rameshwar Prasad v. State of Bihar, 1958 59 Cri LJ 551, 552; Kalyansundaram v. Kalyani Ammal, 1975 Cri LJ 1717, 1718.
38. Sohan Lal v/ Mohan Lal, 1976 Cri LJ 1354, 1355, (HP).
39. Kachrulal Bhagirath Agarwal v. State of Maharashtra, 2005 9 SCC 36.
40. Chhitar v Chhoga, 1974 Cri LJ 1230, 1233 (Raj); State of MP v. Manji Raghu, 1964 2 Cri LJ 94, 96 (MP).
41. Hiralal v. Jogesgwar Ram, 1973 Cri LJ 1375, 1577 (HP).
42. Makhan Lal v. buta Singh, 2003 Cri LL 4147 (P&H).
43. Vasant Manga Nikumba v. Baburao Bhikanna Naidu, 1995 4 SCC 54.
44. Jatindra Nath v. Maindra Nath, 1950 Cri LJ 1241; Dwarika Pras ad v B.K. Roy Choudhury, 1950 51 Cri LJ 1315.
45. Ram Kishore v. State, 1973 Cri LJ 1527, 1528 (HP); State of Kerala v. Cherian Secariah, 1967 Cri LJ 634, 635.
46. State of Mysore v. V.M. Hegde, 1973 Cri LJ 359 (Mys); Shaukat Hussain v Sheodyal Saksaina. 1958 59 Cri Lj 1319, 1320 (MP).
47. Ramesh Chandra v. U.P. Pollution Control Board, 2000 Cri LJ 2771 (All).
48. Executive Officer v. Dadda Satyavath, 1999 Cri LJ 1424 (AP).
49. C.A. Avarachan v. C.V. Sreenivasan, 1996 7 SCC 71.
50. Municipal Council v. Vardichan, 1980 4 SCC 162.
51. Abdul Hamid v. Gwalior Rayons Silk Mfg. Co. Ltd., 1989 Cri LJ 2013; Nagarjuna Paper Mills Ltd. v SDMand RD officer, Sangareddy, 1987 Cri LJ 2071 (AP).
52. State of M.P. v. Kedia Leather & Liquor, 2003 7 SCC 389.
53. Ratanlal and Dhirajlal , COMMENTARY ON THE CODE O F CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 251, (Justice Chandramauli Kumar Prasad and Namit Saxena eds., 22nd edn, 2017).
54. Ram Autar v. State of U.P., 1963 1 Cri LJ 14, 15016; Himmat Singh v. Bhagwana Ram, 1988 Cri LJ 614 (Raj).
55. Noise Pollution (5), re, 2005 5 SCC 733.
56. Gobind Singh v. Shanti Sarup, 1979 3 SCC 267, 269; Madhavi v. Thilakan, 1989 Cri LJ 499 (Ker). NJCL (2018) 43-53 © Law Journals 2018. All Rights Reserved Page 53
57. Somnath v. State, 1974 Cri JL 52 (Goa JCC); Vayale Veettil Balakrishna Nambiar v. R. Madhavan Nambiar, 1986 Cri LJ 109 (Ker).
58. Kachrulal Bhagirath Agarwal v. State of Maharashtra, 2005 9 SCC 36.
59. Rohan Vaman Savaiker v. State, 2010 Cri LJ 2719 (Bom).
60. Law Commission of India. supra note 9; 59.
61. Madhu Limaye v. SDM, Monghyr, 1970 3 SCC 746; Pradyot Kumar v. Bank of India, 1973 Cri LJ 1361 (Cal).
62. Jagdishwaranand v. Police Com missioner, 1983 Cri LJ 1872 (Cal).
63. B. Linga Murthy v. B/ Hussain Saheb, 1979 Cri LJ 1147, 1149 (AP); Gopalji Prasad v. State of Sikkin, 1981 Cri LJ 60, 63 (Sikk).
64. Jagrupa Kumari v. Chotay Narain Singh, 1970 3 SCC 746.
65. Justice K.D. Shahi, editor. Princep’s Commentary on The Code of Criminal Procedure, Vol. I. Lucknow: Eastern Book Company; 2000.
66. Gopalji Prasad v. State of Sikkim, 1981 Cri LJ 60, 62 (Sikk).
67. Madhu Limaye v. SDM, Monghyr, 1971 AIR 2486.
68. Akhil Bhratiya Sarkari Lottery Vyapari Mahasangh v. Commr. of Police, 1999 Cri LJ 3600 (Del).
69. Bimla Kanta Bagchi v. Sanat Kumar Ghose, 1939 40 Cri LJ 144, 145.
70. M.E. Suppy Co. v. State of Bihar, 1973 Cri LJ 143, 144 (Pat).
71. Bijay Kumar Dalmia v. Sanwarmal Jalal, 1988 Cri Lj 712 (Gau).
72. Jayantilal v. Eric REnison, 19 75 Cri LJ 661, 669 (Guj).
73. Manual Bux v. Ram Rup Sah, 1983 Cri LJ 1215, 1216 (Pat).
74. Pitachi v. Mognatham, 1931 33 Cri Lj 826, 827; Zila Parishad, Etwah v. K.C. Saxena, 1977 Cri LJ 1747, 1750 (All).
75. Fateh Singh v. State of Bihar, 1972 Cri LJ 1655, 1658 (Pat).
76. Law Commission of India, supra note 3; 217-218.
77. Law Commission of India, supra note 9; 61. Cite this Article Hitesh Kumar A. Executive Magistrates’ Power to Maintain Law and Order. 1(1): 43–53p.
