Pre-Sentence Hearings: A Comprehensive Guide to Justice Before Sentencing

Authors

  • Swaraj Pushkar

Keywords:

Individualized, society and the individual, implications-advocating, empirical data, PreSentence Hearings

Abstract

Pre-sentence hearings represent a crucial, often overlooked phase in India’s criminal justice system, bridging conviction and sentencing to ensure justice is both fair and humane. This article opens by challenging the assumption that a verdict concludes the courtroom narrative, introducing pre-sentence hearings as a vital opportunity for courts to consider the circumstances and rights of the convicted individual. The article first outlines the legal foundations of pre-sentence hearings under the Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS, 2023), then examines their constitutional validity through key Supreme Court judgments, emphasizing the protection of rights enshrined in the Preamble and Articles 19 and 21. It proceeds to detail the principles and procedures that guide these hearings, highlighting the importance of individualized sentencing and the careful weighing of aggravating and mitigating factors. Subsequent sections analyse the role of social context and mental health in sentencing, drawing on landmark cases and empirical data to illustrate the judiciary’s evolving approach. The article also presents statistical insights into the prevalence of mental health and socioeconomic challenges among prisoners, reinforcing the need for a more rehabilitative, context-sensitive system. Concluding, the article provides a clear roadmap: from legal frameworks and constitutional principles, through practical procedures and case studies, to broader societal implications-advocating for a justice system that balances deterrence with empathy and reform, ensuring sentences serve both society and the individual.

References

Mahesh Bhatt v. UOI and Anr., Writ Petition No. 790 of 2007.

Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India 1978 AIR 597.

Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab AIR 1980 SC 898.

Sunil Dutt Sharma v. State (Government of NCT of Delhi) 2014 SCC 4 375.

Accused ‘X’ v. State of Maharashtra AIR 2019 SC 3031.

Narayansingh v. State Of Madhya Pradesh (1988) SCC ONLINE MP 139.

Sukhpal Singh Khaira v. The State of Punjab 2022 INSC 1250.

State of Rajasthan v. Jamil Khan (2014), DB Civil Writ Petition (Parole) No. 4649/2013.

Santosh Kumar Singh v. State (2010) 9 SCC 747.

Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal 1994 SCR (1) 37.

Law Commission of India, 47th Report on The Trial and Punishment of Social and Economic

Offences, Ministry of Law and Affairs, Government of India.

https://journals.lww.com/aips/fulltext/2024/08010/prison_mental_health___an_indian_perspectiv

e.17.aspx.

Published

2025-05-13

How to Cite

Pushkar, S. . (2025). Pre-Sentence Hearings: A Comprehensive Guide to Justice Before Sentencing. National Journal of Criminal Law, 8(2), 37–42. Retrieved from https://lawjournals.celnet.in/index.php/njcl/article/view/1834