Leveraging Digital Tools for Monitoring and Reporting Child Sexual Abuse: A Comprehensive Review
Keywords:
Digital tools, Detection, Reporting CSA, sensitive dataAbstract
There is a global epidemic of child sexual abuse which calls for creative methods of detection and prevention. The use of digital tools has become a more viable monitoring and reporting technique for cases of child sexual abuse in recent years. This paper offers a thorough analysis of the application of digital tools for child sexual abuse reporting and monitoring, emphasizing the tools’ advantages, disadvantages, and potential applications. Digital tools are essential for analyzing large volumes of online content – including social media posts, chat logs, and images – to spot possible occurrences of child sexual abuse, includes machine learning techniques, natural language processing, and image recognition software. These techniques make it possible for suspicious patterns and behaviors to be automatically detected, which helps law enforcement and child protection organizations investigate cases more effectively. For victims and witnesses, reporting child sexual abuse can be an overwhelming job because of fear, stigma, and ignorance. Online platforms provide anonymous reporting tools that let people share their experiences of sexual abuse. Additionally, web portals and mobile applications expedite the reporting process by giving users easily navigable interfaces. There are a number of obstacles to overcome before digital tools can be fully integrated into child sexual abuse reporting and monitoring. Privacy issues are raised by the gathering of the precision and cultural awareness of natural language processing models and machine learning algorithms. To sum up, digital tools offer to support efforts to track and report child sexual abuse. By utilizing big data analytics, artificial intelligence, and internet platforms, stakeholders can improve early detection, expedite reporting procedures, and promptly assist victims of cybercrime. Achieving this potential needs a multidisciplinary strategy that prioritizes the rights and welfare of children while addressing ethical, legal, and technical issues.
References
Prasad P, Reddy S. Applications of machine learning in child sexual abuse detection. Int J Eng Adv Tech. 2019;8:120.
Ibid.
Bursztein E, et al. Rethinking the detection of child sexual abuse images on the internet. Proc. 2019 World Wide Web Conf. (2019).
Ibid.
Keeley J, Little J, eds. International centre for missing and exploited children. 2017. Available at: https://www.icmec.org/.
Ibid.
Rizza C, Pereira G. Promoting safe and responsible internet and cell phone use. 2013. Available at: https://www.saferinternet.org/.
Microsoft. Developing and sharing tools to fight child sexual abuse. Available at: https://protectingchildren.google/#tools-to-fight-csam.
O’Neill B. Child protection in cyberspace: the role of international agreements. Int J Commun Soc Dev. 2013;297:2.
Rizza & Pereira, supra note 7.
Prasad & Reddy, supra note 1.
Ibid.
Fourie D. (2020). The use of technology in preventing and addressing child sexual exploitation. Available at: https://www.childsafe.org/.
Ibid.
Council of Eur., Recommendation CM/Rec (2018)7 of the committee of ministers to member states on guidelines to respect, protect, and fulfill the rights of the child in the digital environment. 2018. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/guidelines-to-respect-protect-and-fulfil-the-rights-of-the-child-in-th/16808d881a.
O’Neill, supra note 9.
Rizza & Pereira, supra note 7.
Ibid.
Napier S, Teunissen C, Boxall H. Live streaming of child sexual abuse: an analysis of offender dynamics. Trend Issue Crime Crim Just. 2021; 637.
Ibid.
Prasad & Reddy, supra note 1.
Rizza & Pereira, supra note 7.
Canadian Centre for Child Protection. Technology facilitated child sexual exploitation. Available at: https://www.protectchildren.ca/.
Microsoft, supra note 8.
Bursztein, supra note 3.
Human Rights Council. (2016). Report of the special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/.
Nat’l Ctr. for Missing & Exploited Child. (2020). CyberTipline data: the impact of COVID-19. Available at: https://www.missingkids.org/blog/2020/cybertipline-data-the-impact-of-covid-19.
Fourie, supra note 13.
Bulger M. Where policy and practice collide: comparing United States, South African and European Union approaches to protecting children online. 2017; New Med Soc. 750; 19.
Facebook. (2020). Using technology to fight child exploitation. Available at: https://about.fb.com/news/2020/02/using-technology-to-fight-child-exploitation/ [Accessed on February 2020].
Google. (2019). Helping combat online child sexual abuse material. Available at: https://protectingchildren.google/#content-safety-api.
Bulger, supra note 29.
Council of Europe, supra note 15.
Ibid.
Online Safety Bill, HL Bill (2021–22) (UK).
Ibid.
Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) (Austl.).
Bursztein, supra note 3.
Napier, Teunissen, Boxall, supra note 19.
Bursztein, supra note 3.
Bulger, supra note 29.
Criminal Code of Türkiye, Venice Commission Opinion no. 831/2015. (2016). Available at: https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-REF(2016)011-e.
O’Neill, supra note 9.
NCMEC, supra note 27.
Council of Europe, supra note 15.
Prasad & Reddy, supra note 1.
Bursztein, supra note 3.
Rizza & Pereira, supra note 7.
Council of Europe, supra note 15.
Napier, Teunissen, Boxall, supra note 19.
Fourie, supra note 13.
Council of Europe, supra note 15.
O’Neill, supra note 9.
