A Glance at the ‘Confession’ under Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Keywords:
legal framework, adjudication, Understanding, extra-judicial confession, India's ManusmritiAbstract
The concept of confession under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 holds significant importance in the legal landscape, drawing from historical roots in ancient civilizations such as Greece, Rome, and India's Manusmriti. Although not explicitly defined, Lord Atkin's formulation has been widely accepted, characterizing confession as a specific type of admission pertaining to facts constituting an offense. Confessions can be categorized as judicial or extra-judicial, with the former carrying greater evidentiary weight. However, the credibility of a confession diminishes if retracted or withdrawn. The voluntary nature of confession is fundamental, necessitating that it be made without coercion, inducement, or threats. Sections 24, 28, and 29 outline the circumstances of relevance for confessions, while sections 25, 26, and 27 delineate rules regarding confessions made to police officers. Section 31
addresses the admissibility of confessions made by one accused against another. Moreover, the distinction between admission and confession, as well as between judicial and extra-judicial confession, is elucidated. Understanding the nuances of confession within the legal framework is essential for ensuring fair and just adjudication.
References
1. Batuk Lal. The Law of Evidence. 23rd ed. Central Law Agency; 2020.
2. Ratanlal, Dhirajlal. Law of Evidence. 27th ed. LexisNexis; 2020.
3. Rao VN. The Indian Evidence Act. 3rd ed. LexisNexis; 2020.
4. Sarathi VP. Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act (I of 1872) —Sir James Stephen and Deoman Upadhyaya. Indian Law Inst. 1964;6:332.
5. Bossy J. The social history of confession in the age of the Reformation. Cambridge Univ Press. 1975;25:21.
6. Sengupta A. Confessions in the custody of a police officer: Is it the opportune time for change? Student Advocate Comm. 2006;18:31.
7. National Institute of Open Schooling. (2024). Library and Information Science (339). Module 2, Lesson 8: E-Resources. NOIDA: National Institute of Open Schooling; 2019. p. 134-153. Available from: https://nios.ac.in/media/documents/SrSecLibrary/LCh-008.pdf.
8. Patra DK, Mallick N. Artificial intelligence and its challenges for intellectual property in India. Manupatra Articles. 2021 Aug 3. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3915335.
9. Scconline.com. (2019). SCC Online®. The Surest Way To Legal Research. [online] Available from: https://www.scconline.com/ [Accessed 2 Nov. 2024]
10. Anker R. Theories of occupational segregation by sex: An overview. Int Labour Rev. 1997;136:315.
11. Talk Law, Live Law, Make Law(s). Clarke T, translator. Aust J Asian Law. 1999;1:80 -89. Originally published in Dushu, November 1997.
12. Burdett K. A theory of employee job search and quit rates. Am Econ Rev. 1978;68:212-20.
13. Legalservicesindia.com. (2015). Legal Services India - Laws in India, Supreme court judgments, lawyers in India. [online] Available from: https://www.legalservicesindia.com/
14. Balasubramanian G. (2021). Feminist Critique: Woman Director under Companies Act. [online] Academike. Available from: https://www.lawctopus.com/academike/women-director-ca/.
15. Jaimini S. Beyond boardroom: White -collar crime in cyberspace. Nat J Cyber Secur Law. 2023;6(2):12–27.
16. Messner M, DiStaso MW. Wikipedia versus Encyclopedia Britannica: A longitudinal analysis to identify the impact of social media on the standards of knowledge. Mass Commun Soc. 2013;16(4):465–86. DOI: 10.1080/15205436.2012.732649.
17. Lakshmi NH, Vani C. Contribution of electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs) by the universities of Andhra Pradesh to the Shodhganga project of INFLIBNET: A study. 26th International Symposium ETD 2023; 2023 Oct 26-28; Gandhinagar, Gujarat. INFLIBNET Centre, Gandhinagar; 2023 Nov 17. Available from: http://ir.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/1944/2415.
18. Pakala Narayan Swami v. Emperor, (1939) 41 BomLR 428.
19. Palvinder Kaur v. State of Punjab, AIR 1952 SC 354.
20. Nazir v. Emperor, AIR 1933 All. 31.
21. R v. Baswanta, 25 Bom. 1683; Raggha v. Emperor, AIR 1925 All. 627.
22. Roshan Lal v. Union of India, AIR 1965 HP 1.
23. Viranwally v. State, AIR 1961 JK 11.
24. Emperor v. Kutub Bux, AIR 1958 Pepsu 33; P. Rustamji v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1971 SC 1087.
25. Chaman Lal v. State of J. and K., 1976 CrLJ 1310.
26. Batuk Lal. The Law of Evidence. 23rd ed. Central Law Agency; 2020. p. 223.
27. Bhagirathi v. State of M.P., AIR 1959 MP 17.
28. Rangappa Hanamppa v. State, AIR 1954 Bom. 285.
29. Sengupta A. Confessions in the custody of a police officer: Is it the opportune time for change? Student Advocate Comm. 2006;18:31, 33.
30. Ramesh Chand Mehta v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1970 SC 940; State of Punjab v. Barkat Ram, 1962 SCR 338.
31. Raj Kumar Karnwal v. Union of India, AIR 1991 SC 45.
32. Bal Krishnan v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1981 SC 379.
33. Abdul Rashid v. State of Bihar, AIR 2001 SC 2422.
34. Mst. Maharani v. Emperor, AIR 1948 All. 7; Sri Devi v. State, 1974 CLJ 126.
35. Ali Gauhar v. Emperor, AIR 1941 Sindh 134.
36. R v. Lester, ILR (1895) 20 Bom. 165.
37. Batuk Lal. The Law of Evidence. 23rd ed. Central Law Agency; 2020. p. 249.
38. Ram Singh v. Sonia, AIR 2007 SC 1218.
39. Mst. Maharani v. Emperor, AIR 1948 All. 7.
40. Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Act, 1987, section 15.
41. The Indian Evidence Act, 1872, section 26, Expl.
42. State of U.P. v. Deoman Upadhyaya, AIR 1960 SC 1125; State of Assam v. U.N. Rajkhowa, 1975 CrLJ 354.
43. State of U.P. v. Jogesar, AIR 1983 SC 349.
44. Pandu Rang Kalu Patil v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 2002 SC 733.
45. Raja Khime v. State of Saurashtra, AIR 1956 SC 217.
46. Kashi Ram v. Emperor, AIR 1955 Lah 433.
47. Pulukuri Kotayya v. King Emperor, AIR 1947 PC 67.
48. Batuk Lal. The Law of Evidence. 23rd ed. Central Law Agency; 2020. p. 261.
49. Suresh Budharmal Kalani v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1998 SC 3258.
50. Dengo Kendero v. Emperor, AIR 1938 Sind 94.
51. Code of Criminal Procedure, section 219(2).
52. Balbir Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1957 SC 216.
