Analyzing Wrongful Restraint and Wrongful Confinement
Keywords:
Wrongful restraint, wrongful confinement, penal consequences, interpretations, unlike civil wrongsAbstract
This project delves into the concepts of "Wrongful Restraint" and "Wrongful Confinement" as delineated within sections 339 to 348 of The Indian Penal Code (IPC), offering a comprehensive analysis that includes definitions, interpretations, penal consequences, relevant jurisprudence, and the examination of more severe instances of confinement. Originating from the English law tort of false imprisonment, these offenses are distinct in that wrongful restraint and wrongful confinement are recognized under criminal law as public wrongs, aiming to safeguard an individual's liberty and freedom of movement across India as enshrined in Articles 21 and 19 of the Indian Constitution, respectively. Unlike civil wrongs, which primarily affect individuals and are redressable through compensation, these crimes are punishable under the IPC, reflecting their societal impact.
References
1. Ratanlal R, Dhirajlal D. The Indian Penal Code. 32nd enlarged ed. New Delhi: Lexis Nexis; 2024.
2. Gaur KD. Textbook on Indian Penal Code. 6th ed. New Delhi: Universal Law Publishing; 2024.
3. Vibhute KI. PSA Pillai’s Criminal Law. 13th ed. New Delhi: Lexis Nexis; 2024.
4. Mishra SN. Indian Penal Code. 20th ed. Allahabad: Central Law Publications; 2024.
5. Saxena RN. Indian Penal Code. 19th ed. Allahabad: Central Law Publications; 2024.
6. Basu’s Criminal Court Handbook containing Criminal Major Acts. 10th ed. Allahabad: Orient Publishing Company; 2024.
7. Patra DK, Mallick N. Artificial intelligence and its challenges for intellectual property in India. Manupatra Articles. August 3, 2021. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3915335.
8. Dcourts.gov.in. (2024). Sonitpur District Judiciary. S3WaaS – Secure, Scalable, Sugamya. India. [online] Available from: https://sonitpur.dcourts.gov.in/
9. Indiankanoon.org. (2024). Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law. [online] Available from: https://indiankanoon.org/
10. Legalservicesindia.com. (2015). Legal Services India - Laws in India, Supreme court judgments, lawyers in India. [online] Available from: https://www.legalservicesindia.com/
11. Union of India. Section 399 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860: Making preparation to commit dacoity. Acts of Parliament, 1860.
12. Shanmugham And Ors. vs Unknown, 20 January 1970. 1971 CRI L J 182.
13. Gujarat High Court. 1993 CRI L J 248. 1992 Cri LR (SC MAH GUJ) 375.
14. B&B Associates (2018). Wrongful Restraint - B&B Associates LLP. [online] B&B Associates LLP. Available from: https://bnblegal.com/article/wrongful-restraint/
15. Abdul Waheed vs State of U.P. and Others, 10 January 2020. AIRONLINE 2020 ALL 228.
16. Indian Penal Code. Section 342: Punishment for wrongful confinement.
17. Sushil Ansal vs State Thr. CBI, 5 March 2014. 2014 AIR SCW 2689, 2014 (6) SCC 173, AIR 2014 SC (CRI) 1203, AIR 2014 SC (SUPP) 293, (2014) 1 CURCRIR 552, (2014) 4 KCCR 333, 2014 CALCRILR 2689, (2014) 2 DLT (CRL) 428, 2014 (2) SCC (CRI) 717, (2014) 2 TAC 391, (2014) 3 SCALE 174, (2014) 58 OCR 5, (2015) 1 GAU LT 79.
18. Ratanlal & Dhirajlal. The Indian Penal Code. 32nd Enlarged ed. Gurgaon: Lexis Nexis; p. 1923.
19. Constitution of India. Article 19(1).
20. Law Commission of India. Thirty -Fifth Report: Volume I –III (Capital Punishment). New Delhi: Government of India, Ministry of Law; September 1967.
21. Surender Singh Alias Surendra Singh Alias Surendra Singh Ahluwalia vs The State Of Jharkhand And Anr. Jharkhand High Court, 20 September 2017.
22. Perkins RM. Rationale of mens rea. A Harvard Law Review. 1938;52:905.
23. Q.B. 1845;7:742.
24. Mishra SN. Indian Penal Code. 20th ed. Allahabad: Central Law Publications; p. 690.
25. Ratanlal & Dhirajlal. The Indian Penal Code. 32nd Enlarged ed. Gurgaon: Lexis Nexis; p. 1931.
26. Ratanlal & Dhirajlal. The Indian Penal Code. 32nd Enlarged ed. Gurgaon: Lexis Nexis; p. 1939.
27. Bhaskar MA. Arrest of persons and warrants. Supremo Amicus. 2021;24:833.
28. MacKinnon CA. Reflections on sex equality under law. Yale Law J. 1991 Mar;1281-328.
29. Pinsler JD. The inherent powers of the court. Sing. J. Legal Stud. 1997;1.
30. AIR 1952 Pat 379.
31. Li DH, Rawat S, Rhoton J, Patankar P, Ekstrand ML, Rosser BS, Wilkerson JM. Harassment and violence among men who have sex with men (MSM) and hijras after reinstatement of India’s Sodomy Law. Sex Res Soc Policy. 2017 Sep;14(3):324-30.
32. Dix GE. Mistake, ignorance, expectation of benefit, and the modern law of confessions. Wash ULQ. 1975:275.
33. Saxena RN. Indian Penal Code. 19th ed. Allahabad: Central Law Publications; p. 441.
