National Security and Counter Terrorism Laws in the United States
Keywords:
Terrorism laws, Military Commission, Detention, USA Patriot Act, Biological weapons, Anti-terrorism, Execution Order, Al-Qaeda, Homeland Security, National Security, Counter Terrorism, United States of America, World Trade CenterAbstract
Throughout the research paper, I have tried to exhibit the nature of counter terrorism laws in the United States. Initially, the paper dealt with the history of terrorist attacks in the United States. This part of the history includes a series of terrorist attacks in the United States from the demolition of the U.S. Embassy in the west Beirut. The paper also focuses on certain significant statutes such as the biological weapons Anti-Terrorism Act 1989, Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act 1996, The USA PATRIOT Act 2001, and Military Commission Act 2006. To make the research more effective, there was a study on the Executive Order 12947 and the Executive Order 13224. The paper also had attempted to substantially research on the concept of detention. With an attempt to research about the concept of detention, the paper has also given special emphasis to the landmark judgments such as Humdi v.
Rumsfled, United States v. Melendez Carrion, Salerno v. United States. In addition to traditional terrorism, the United States grappled with cybersecurity threats, including attacks on critical infrastructure, government institutions, and private businesses. These threats could be attributed to state-sponsored actors, criminal organizations, or hacktivist groups. The United States continued to monitor and combat international terrorism, albeit with a diminished threat from groups like Al-Qaeda and ISIS. Law enforcement agencies at the federal and state levels remained engaged in counterterrorism efforts, including surveillance, intelligence sharing, and the apprehension of individuals involved in terrorist plots.
References
1. Britannica. (n.d.). The attacks. [Online] Available at https://www.britannica.com/event/September- 11-attacks/The-attacks [Accessed on April 2024]
2. National Academy of Sciences. (2010). Sequence-based classification of select agents: a brighter line. [Online] Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK50860/ [Accessed on April 2024]
3. Dagen HA. Bioterrorism: perfectly legal. Cath U Law Rev . 2000; 49 (2). [Online] Available at https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview/vol49/iss2/7 [Accessed on April 2024]
4. Exec.Order No.12947
5. Federal Register. (1995). Prohibiting transactions with terrorists who threaten to disrupt the Middle east peace process. [Onl ine] Available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR -1995-01- 25/pdf/X95-110125.pdf [Accessed on April 2024]
6. Lewis NA. TERROR IN OKLAHOMA: IN CONGRESS; Anti -Terrorism Bill: blast turns a snail into a race horse. Available at https://www.nytimes.com/1995/04/21/us/terror-oklahoma-congress- anti-terrorism-bill-blast-turns-snail-into-race-horse.html [Accessed on April 2024]
7. Congressional Record. (1995). Report of proposed legislation entitled the OMNIBUS COUNTERTERRORISM ACT OF 1995: message from the president: PM 16. [Online] Available at https://irp.fas.org/congress/1995_cr/s950209-terror.htm [Accessed on April 2024]
8. Executive Order 13224. (n.d.). [Online] Available at https://www.state.gov/executive-order- 13224/#:~:text=In%20general%20terms%2C%20the%20Order,of%20committing%2C%20acts%2 0of%20terrorism [Accessed on April 2024] 9.U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (n.d.). Secretary of Homeland Security. [Online] Available at https://www.dhs.gov/topics/secretary-homeland-security [Accessed on April 2024] America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) Act of 2001. [Online] Available at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/PLAW- 107publ56 [Accessed on April 2024] international law . J Crim Law Criminol. 2008; 98 (3). [Online] Available at https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7296&context=jclc [Accessed on April 2024] National Security and Counter-terrorism Counter Parvathy S.L. https://www.hrw.org/legacy/backgrounder/usa/qna1006/usqna1006.htm#_Toc148852440 [Accessed on April 2024] 22.United States, Hamdan v. Rumsfeld. [Online] Available at https://casebook.icrc.org/case- study/united-states-hamdan-v-rumsfeld [Accessed on April 2024] Available at https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/11299/170159/1/23_03_Estreicher_OScannlain.pdf [Accessed on April 2024]
