Basic Structure Doctrine—Absolute or Obsolete?

Authors

  • Shivam Tyagi

Keywords:

Parliament, amending power, democracy, constitution, basic structure.

Abstract

Fundamental component; we are not bound by parliamentary democracy or by ideology. Purpose: The authors of the constitution, who had a developing and expanding nation in mind, gave parliament the authority to alter the document in anticipation of its being modified by and for—WE THE PEOPLE. The Parliament of India has the authority, as outlined in Article 368 of the Indian Constitution, to amend or repeal any provision within the Constitution itself. This power of amendment is independent of other provisions in the Constitution. Parliament can exercise anticipation its constituent power to modify or remove any specific provision within the Constitution by following the procedures specified in Article 368. This Constitution may only be amended by a Bill tabled in either House of Parliament that is expressly intended to do so following the Bill’s passage. (a) Articles 54, 55, 73, 162, or 241; (b) Chapter IV of Part V, Chapter V of Part VI, or Chapter I of Part XI; (c) any of the Lists in the Seventh Schedule; (d) the representation of States in Parliament; or (e) the provisions of this article, the amendment must also be ratified by the legislatures of at least 50% of the States. Any law or provision included in Part III of the Indian Constitution, regardless of whether it was enacted before or after the implementation of Section 55 of the Constitution (Forty Second Amendment) Act, 1976, can be legally challenged in any court based on any grounds. It is explicitly stated that there are no limitations whatsoever on the constituent power of Parliament to introduce new elements, modify existing ones, or completely abolish the Constitution. Part XXI of the Temporary, Transitional, and Special Provisions Any modification made in accordance with this article is exempt from Article 13’s requirements. This Constitution may not be changed in any way, including the clauses; however, the Indian Constitution's main core was protected by the inclusion of Article 13, which is crucial for altering. All laws that were in effect in India prior to the ratification of this Constitution and that conflict with the provisions of this Part will be invalid to the extent of the conflict. Any State law that limits or otherwise restricts the rights conferred by this section is forbidden and, to the extent that it does so, is void. Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the term “law” as used in this article refers to any ordinance, order, byelaw, rule, regulation, notification, custom, or usage that has legal weight in Indian territory. The answer to this question is unclear; however, with the intent of imposing any limitations on parliament’s ability to amend the constitution. A significant ruling established the basic structure theory; however, this raises the question of how much the basic structure can be altered by the legislature. What use does a democratic state constitution serve if there are no limitations on modifying the law? The core principles
of the doctrine are succinctly explained in this article, along with the justifications for broadening its scope through judicial pronouncements.

Published

2023-08-21

How to Cite

Tyagi, S. . (2023). Basic Structure Doctrine—Absolute or Obsolete?. National Journal of Criminal Law, 6(2), 57–61. Retrieved from https://lawjournals.celnet.in/index.php/njcl/article/view/1331