An Analysis of the Rights and Remedies available to Copyright Holders

Rights and Remedies of Copyright Holders

Authors

  • Indrayudh Chowdhury Student

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37591/jiprl.v5i1.945

Keywords:

Copyrights, Rights, Remedies, Copyright Infringement

Abstract

Just like the Median Strips running down the middle of the road that safely guides a lonely passenger traversing the dark roads less travelled, similarly, Copyright Laws act like a beacon of hope for innovators who aim to push the boundaries of their fields without hesitation or concern. The Global economy is expanding at an inconceivable rate that astonishes even the most astute economist who
tries to predict any future growth rate. This phenomenon is occurring due to the rapid pace of innovation being carried out by the brightest minds across the globe. Although innovation is a boon, any innovation without rights to protect them would only hamper our growth, as individuals would be discouraged from innovating if they are left unsure whether their inventions and any vested rights
would be protected or not. Protection would refer to proper recognition of the creator (of the invention) and the economic and moral rights that come attached with the creation of an invention. This is where the concept of Copyright Law comes into existence. This paper highlights the author’s research on the topic of the rights of copyright holders and remedies available to them in case of
copyright infringement and the effectiveness of such remedies in modern times. 

References

Michiel Kolman, President of the International Publishers Association and Senior Vice President for Information Industry Relations, Elsevier.

https://www.wipo.int/copyright/en/, last accessed on 07/11/2021 at 1:15 PM IST.

The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, 1886.

Katar Singh Giani v. Ladha Singh, (1935) ILR 16 LAH 103, vol. 16.

Manohar Lal Chopra v. Sethi Hiralal, AIR 1962 SC 527.

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Harbuns v. Bhairo, ILR C 259 (PC).

Best Sellers Retail Pvt. Ltd. v. Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd, 6 SCC 792.

Kishore Sinha v. Maruti Corporation, (2009) 11 SCC 299.

Walter Arthur Copinger, Copinger & Skone James, Pg. 332-333, 13th edition.

Hindustan Pencils Ltd v. Alpna Cottage Industries, MIPR 2007 (1) 41.

R.G. Anand v. M/s Delux Films, AIR (1978) SC 1613

Khajanchi Film Exchange v. State of MP, AIR (2003) MP 3

Jolen Inc. v. Shoban Lal Jain, 2001 (21) PTC 216 (Mad).

The Information Technology Act, 2000.

Published

2022-07-29