The Evolution of Visual Similarity Tests in Indian Trademark Law: A Comparison with International Standards
Keywords:
Visual Resemblance, Trademarks, Similarity Tests, Indian CourtsAbstract
Visual resemblance is a primary cause of trademark issues. When two trademarks seem similar, even marginally, buyers may be confused. Over time, Indian courts have evolved their approach to visual similarity, moving from simple, side-by-side comparisons to broader, more practical determinations. This article examines how Indian Courts currently test for visual similarity and compares their approach to worldwide standards utilized in the UK, EU, and US. It also identifies weaknesses in India's system and proposes what else should be done. The Indian courts have, over the course of time, moved away from making mechanical comparisons and are now more likely to take into consideration the overall appearance of the markings. The essay investigates the circumstances that led to the transformation, as well as the manner in which India's approach compares to worldwide standards.
References
1. V.K. Ahuja, Law of Intellectual Property Rights, LexisNexis 2022, 237.
2. P. Narayanan, Law of Trademarks and Passing Off (Eastern Law House 2020), 86.
3. Trade Marks Act 1999, ss. 9, 11, 29.
4. Ibid.
5. Amritdhara Pharmacy v. Satya Deo Gupta, AIR 1963 SC 449.
6. Lionel Bently and Brad Sherman, Intellectual Property Law (Oxford University Press 2021) 104.
7. Cadila Healthcare Ltd. v. Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd., AIR 2001 SC 1952.
8. Parle Products v. J.P. & Co., AIR 1972 SC 1359.
9. S.M. Dyechem Ltd. v. Cadbury India Ltd., (2000) 5 SCC 573.
10. Shree Nath Heritage v. Allied Blenders, 2015 SCC OnLine Del 13955.
11. Sabel v. Puma AG, [1997] ECR I-6191.
12. Ibid.
13. Polaroid Corp. v. Polarad Electronics, 287 F.2d 492 (2d Cir. 1961).
