The Protection of Trademark Owners under Cameroonian Law: A Critical Analysis
Abstract
This paper critically examines the protection of trademark owners under Cameroonian law, evaluating its effectiveness and the challenges faced in practice. Trademark protection plays a vital role in promoting innovation, building consumer trust, and preserving the integrity of the marketplace. This paper begins with an overview of the legal framework governing trademarks in Cameroon, including relevant statutes, international agreements as well as domestic legislations. It further explores the mechanisms available for enforcement of liabilities by the competent courts on trademark rights. The paper also highlights key challenges, such as inadequate enforcement, lack of public awareness, and the prevalence of counterfeit goods, which undermine the protection of trademark owners. By adopting doctrinal analysis, this paper aims to provide recommendations for enhancing the protection of trademark owners in Cameroon, promoting a more robust and friendly environment for businesses and safeguarding consumer interests.
References
1. Parveen S. Intellectual property rights. Masters Dissertation. University of Aligarh (India); 2002. p. 26.
2. Colston C. Op. cit. 1999. p. 8.
3. Ibid.
4. Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property. March 20, 1883; lastly amended September 28, 1979.
5. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Dispute settlement World Trade Organization 3.5 GATT 1994. 2003. p. 3.
6. Annex 1A of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization. Signed in Marrakesh, Morocco on 15 April 1994.
7. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Op. cit. 2003. p. 4.
8. Ndi R. Op. cit. 2017. p. 14.
9. Bodenhausen GHC. Guide to the application of the Paris Convention for the protection of intellectual property as revised at Stockholm in 1967. Sweden: Dretsingsholmsvägen; 1988. p. 5.
10. Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property. p. 1.
11. WIPO. Summaries of conventions, treaties and agreements administered by WIPO. Publication No. 442; 2011. p. 24.
12. Article 19 of the Paris Treaty.
13. Article 1(2) of the Paris Convention of 1883.
14. Ndi R. Op. cit. 2017. p. 16.
15. Article 2(1) of the Paris Convention. Nationals of any country of the Union shall, as regards the protection of industrial property, enjoy in all other countries of the Union the advantages that their respective laws grant or may hereafter grant to nationals; without prejudice to rights specially provided for by this Convention.
16. Akama SP. Intellectual property law. Lecture notes Masters I, University of Maroua; 2022. p. 4.
17. Article 3 of the Paris Convention 1883.
18. Akama SP. Op. cit. 2022. p. 6.
19. Article 4A(2) of the Paris Convention.
20. Article 9(1) of the Paris Convention.
21. Article 6(1), (2), (3) of the Paris Convention. Op. cit. p. 6.
22. Article 6A(1).
23. Article 6B(1).
24. Article 6B(2).
25. Article 6B(3).
26. Article 48 Annex III of the Bangui Agreement.
27. Article 47(2) of the Bangui Agreement.
28. Mostert F. Famous and well-known trademarks. London: LexisNexis UK; 1997. p. 20.
29. Article 6 of the Paris Convention.
30. Prayank K, Swapna RAM. WIPO Madrid, Madrid application—A one-stop solution for international registration of marks. 2020.
31. Musiza C. Op. cit. 2021. p. 41.
32. Nations Unies-Recueil des Traités. Multilateral Agreement concerning international registration of marks. 1972; Volume 828-I-1852. p. 391.
33. WIPO. Madrid system for the international registration of marks [Internet]. Available from: https://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/registration/madrid/summary-madrid-marks.html. Accessed 2025 Mar 21.
34. Article 1 of the Madrid Agreement.
35. Ibid.
36. Article 1(2) of the Madrid Agreement.
37. Ibid.
38. Article 3 of the Paris Convention. Nationals of countries outside the Union who are domiciled or have real and effective industrial or commercial establishments in the territory of one of the Union countries shall be treated in the same manner as nationals of the Union countries.
39. Article 3 of the Madrid Agreement.
40. Articles 3(1), (2) of the Madrid Agreement.
41. WIPO. Publication No. 418(E). The Madrid Agreement concerning the international registration of marks. p. 4.
42. Ibid. p. 6.
43. Ibid. p. 8.
44. WIPO. Madrid system for the international registration of marks [Internet]. Available from: https://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/registration/madrid/summary-madrid-marks.html. Accessed 2025 Mar 21.
45. Article 5(2) of the Madrid Agreement.
46. Article 7(1) of the Madrid Agreement.
47. Article 7(2) of the Madrid Agreement.
48. Intellectual Property India. Patents, designs, trademarks, geographical indications [Internet]. Available from:
http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/treaties/en/documents/pdf/madrid_marks.pdf.
49. Article 1 of the Madrid Protocol.
50. Article 14(a) of the Madrid Protocol.
51. Article 14(b) of the Madrid Protocol.
52. Provision relating to unification of domestic legislations on marks and notification to the Director General.
53. WIPO. Guide to the Madrid System: International registration of marks under the Madrid Protocol. 2022. p. 250.
54. WIPO. Madrid members [Internet]. Available from: https://www.wipo.int/madrid/en/members. Accessed 2025 Mar 22.
55. EUIPO. Madrid Protocol [Internet]. Available from: https://euipo.europa.eu/ohimportal/en /madrid-protocol. Accessed 2025 Mar 22.
56. Patentlawip. Madrid Protocol trademarks [Internet]. Available from: https://patentlawip.com /practice-areas/trademarks/madrid-protocol-trademarks. Accessed 2025 Mar 22.
57. Red Points. Madrid Protocol [Internet]. Available from: https://www.redpoints.com.blog /madrid-protocol. Accessed 2025 Mar 22.
58. Ndi R. Op. cit. 2017. p. 18.
59. WIPO. Convention establishing WIPO [Internet]. Available from: https://www.wipo.int /treaties/en/convention/summary_wipo_convention.html. Accessed 2025 Mar 22.
60. Ibid.
61. Lalit JB, Rajkishore N. An introduction to intellectual property rights and their importance in Indian context. J Intellect Prop Rights. 2017;22:33.
62. Ibid.
63. WIPO. Nice Agreement concerning the international classification of goods and services for the purposes of the registration of marks. 1992. p. 3.
64. Article 1 of the Nice Agreement.
65. Article 1(2) of the Nice Agreement.
66. Article 2(1) of the Nice Agreement.
67. Article 2(2) of the Nice Agreement.
68. Caroline JN. Challenges of transnational trademark law practice: The case of Nigerian companies’ brands in OAPI States. Rev Gén Droit. 2015;45:332.
69. Musiza C. Op. cit. 2021. p. 44.
70. World Trade Organization. Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights: Part II—Standards concerning the availability, scope and use of intellectual property rights, Sections 5 and 6 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.wto.org/english/docs_a/legal_e27-trips04ce.htm. Accessed 2025 Nov 24.
71. Preamble of the TRIPS Agreement.
72. Malbon J, Lawson C. Interpreting and implementing the TRIPS Agreement: Is it fair? London: Edward Elgar; 2008. p. 15.
73. World Trade Organization [Internet]. Available from: http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/docs _e.htm.
74. McKeown JS. Op. cit. 2010. p. 3.
75. Kutiefe UK. Op. cit. 2021. p. 22.
76. Boyle J, Jenkins J. Intellectual property: Law and the information society. 2014. p. 409.
77. Article 4 of the TRIPS Agreement.
78. Article 16 of the TRIPS Agreement.
79. Article 18 of the TRIPS Agreement.
80. Definition relating to unauthorized use of a trademark on goods including packaging infringing the rights of the trademark owner.
81. Article 51 of the TRIPS Agreement.
82. Akama SP. Intellectual property law. Op. cit. 2022. p. 26.
83. Tavares I. Bangui Agreement: A summary of the essential changes. 2022.
84. Menjenyia LN. The principle of territoriality as a contributory infringement doctrine to copyright under Cameroonian copyright law. Masters Dissertation. University of Dschang; 2022. p. 21.
85. Ibid.
86. Patents Annex I; Utility Models Annex II; Trade Marks and Service Marks Annex III; Industrial Design Annex IV; Trade Names Annex V; Geographical Indications Annex VI; Literary and Artistic Property Annex VII; Protection against Unfair Competition Annex VIII; Layouts-designs (topographies) of integrated circuits Annex IX; Plant Variety Annex X.
87. Article 2(c) and (d) of the 2015 revised Bangui Agreement.
88. Article 42 of the 2015 revised Bangui Agreement.
89. Article 2(1) of Annex III of the Bangui Agreement.
90. Unlawful exploitation includes, inter alia, fixation of fraudulent marks, willfully selling or offering for sale goods bearing a fraudulent mark, making fraudulent imitation of a mark, or offering goods bearing such imitation likely to mislead the buyer.
91. Article 41 of the Bangui Agreement.
92. Colston C. Op. cit. 1999. p. 343.
93. Djoukuou NF. The protection accorded to trademark owners upon registration under Annex III of the revised Bangui Agreement. Masters Dissertation. University of Dschang; 2021.
94. USPTO. Trademarks basic examples [Internet]. Available from: https://www.uspto.gov /trademarks/basic. Accessed 2025 Jan 15.
95. Article 2(2) and (3) of Annex III of the Bangui Agreement.
96. OHADA. History of OHADA [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ohada.org/en/history-of-Ohada. Accessed 2023 May 20.
97. Guinea Bissau, Senegal, Central African Republic, Mali, Comoros, Burkina Faso, Benin, Niger, Ivory Coast, Cameroon, Togo, Chad, Congo, Gabon, Equatorial Guinea and Democratic Republic of Congo are parties to the OHADA Treaty.
98. Bashi JR. OHADA and the making of transnational commercial law in Africa. Law Dev Rev. 2018;11(2):371–395.
99. Leno DN. The OHADA structure as a possible model for the development of a commercial law structure in the Southern African Development Community (SADC). Int J Soc Sci Manag Rev. 2020;3(6):6.
100. Ibid.
101. Mouloul A. Understanding the Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa (OHADA). 2009;60:21.
102. Ibid.
103. OHADA Legis. Intellectual property [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ohadalegis.com /anglais/intell-property.html. Accessed 2025 May 20.
104. Koko HDM. Op. cit. p. 30.
105. Central African Monetary and Economic Union (UDEAC).
106. Central African Monetary Union (UMAC).
107. Wankah. Op. cit. 2012. p. 33.
108. Article 51(1) relating to foreign products bearing misleading trademarks or trade names.
109. Counterfeiting as a customs offence with penalties including confiscation, fines, and imprisonment.
110. Decision No. 2413/CD/COR of 10/08/2006 of the Douala Bonanjo Court of First Instance.
111. Douane Camerounaise [Internet]. Available from: http://douanescustoms-cm.net/en/news/11-breves/450-des-medicaments-saisis-dans-la-region-du-centre.html. Accessed 2024 Jun 10.
112. The 1998 law on competition providing rules for fair competition.
113. Law No. 65/LF/24 of 12 November 1965 on the Penal Code, operational in 1967 and amended by Law No. 2016/007 of 12 July 2016.
114. Ngwafor EN. Corporate criminal responsibility. UK: Star Printers and Publishers Ltd; 1989. p. 1. See also Coplan J, Weisberg R, Binder G. Criminal law cases and materials. 7th ed. Butterworth; 2012. p. 149. See also Eze CE, Uche AP. A new dawn of corporate criminal liability law in the United Kingdom: Lessons for Nigeria. Afr J Law Criminol. 2012;2(1):86–98. p. 87.
115. Article 74(2) of the Penal Code of 1965.
116. Article 330 of the Penal Code.
117. Committee created by Decree No. 2005/0528/PM of 15 February 2005.
118. Wankah. Op. cit. 2012. p. 41.
119. Wankah. Op. cit. p. 32.
120. Goodsill. How does trademark infringement harm your company? [Internet]. Available from: https://www.goodsill.com/blog/2021/02/how-does-trademark-infringement-harm-your-company/. Accessed 2025 Jul 16.
121. Liability can be defined in the simplest form as legal responsibility for someone’s acts or omissions.
122. McCain Institute. Civil liability reading materials [Internet]. Available from: https://www. mccaininstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/civil-liability-reading-materials.pdf. Accessed 2025 Apr 16.
123. Ibid.
124. Article 42 of the TRIPS Agreement.
125. Lawcirca. Trademark infringement and its remedies [Internet]. Available from: https://lawcirca .com/trademark-infringement-and-its-remedies/amp/#top. Accessed 2025 Apr 23.
126. Article 44(1) of the TRIPS Agreement.
127. Schechter RE, Thomas JR. Op. cit. 2003. p. 764.
128. Parr RL. Op. cit. 2018. p. 487.
129. Schechter RE, Thomas JR. Op. cit. 2003. p. 765.
130. Ibid.
131. Ndi R. Op. cit. 2017. p. 77.
132. Tabe ST. International labor law. Lecture notes Master I FSJP, University of Dschang; 2022. p. 294.
133. Provision relating to urgent applications and interim measures before competent domestic courts in counterfeiting actions.
134. Colston C. Op. cit. 1999. p. 419.
135. Brown RS. Civil remedies for intellectual property invasions: Themes and variations. Law Contemp Probl. 1992;55(2):65.
136. Ibid.
137. Deborah EB. Op. cit. 2013. p. 129.
138. The court seized of the matter shall determine damages having regard to financial loss, profits made by the counterfeiter, and moral damage caused.
139. Judicial authorities shall have the authority to order damages, expenses including attorney’s fees, and in appropriate cases recovery of profits or pre-established damages.
140. Ibid.
141. Article 57 of Annex III prescribing penalties including fines and imprisonment.
142. Seize and take legal custody of property due to infringement of law.
143. Doh FG. Trademark law in the African Intellectual Property Organization (OAPI): Jurisdiction under the Bangui Agreement of 2 March 1977 revised on 24 February 1999. Dayspring Law Firm; 2020.
144. Ndi R. Op. cit. 2017. p. 74.
145. Ibid.
146. Provision relating to destruction of infringing goods by competent domestic courts.
147. Nsahlai TW. Op. cit. 2016. p. 102.
148. Authorities shall have the power to order destruction or disposal of infringing goods and prohibit re-exportation except in exceptional circumstances.
149. Mersha B, Hadush G. Op. cit. 2009. p. 292.
150. Article 58 of Annex III prescribing penalties for violations relating to compulsory marks and prohibited signs.
151. Article 60(2) of Annex III defining recidivism within five years.
152. Merchant and Gould. Criminal liability for trademark infringement: A collaborative international study. 2021;258:32.
153. Provision relating to publication of court judgments.
154. Section 330(5) of the Penal Code.
