Guarding the Stumps: Preserving Intellectual Property Rights in the Cricketing World

Authors

  • Kartik Tripathi Christ (Deemed to be University), Bengaluru
  • Parth Verma

Keywords:

Cricket, ICC Cricket World Cup, Intellectual Property Rights, Sacher-Torte, Trademark

Abstract

There have been some brilliant inventions and innovations in science, technology, and law. The advent of intellectual property (IP) law has led to legal intervention in the field of innovations and inventions. This has further led to the production and creation of novel products that were previously non-existent. A concept which has come to light, especially in the 21st century, is the relationship between intellectual property rights law and its implications for manufacturing sporting equipment and goods. The notion of trade secrets under IP law has also emerged. By focusing on contemporary illustrations like the IPL Spot Fixing Case 2013, the Cricket World Cup, and the Sacher Torte Case, the article will cater to the complexities that might arise while addressing IPR in cricket. Additionally, the glamorous aspect of cricket is also provided adequate protection under the IPR regime. The various types of IP applicable to cricket media aspects are trademark, copyright, design, and broadcasting rights, the main purpose of which is to protect the IP rights of all concerned stakeholders. Nevertheless, specific issues might arise in addressing these problems, such as the lack of application of copyrights to particular entities, unlike the IP laws of the USA, and the lack of patent rights for non-Indian entities. Additionally, scams, betting in cricketing events, and ambush marketing have created difficulties in preserving IP rights. This article will delve deeper into all these aspects of IPR in cricket and address the existing challenges. While significant strides have been taken in this field, we still need to realize the ultimate objective, i.e., to protect the IP rights of all in the process.

References

Chandra, Sanjib. April (2011) Intellectual property rights: An overview and implications in pharmaceutical industry. National Library of Medicine. [Online] Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3217699/#:~:text=IPR%20provide%20certain%20exclusive%20rights,%2C%20Copyright%2C%20trademark%2C%20etc.

Intellectual Property Act 2000.

Dawson B. Our troubled Olympics. Seton Hall J. Sport L. 1992; 2: 347.

Stretch, Brink, Hugo. A comparison of the ball rebound characteristics of wooden and composite cricket bats at three approach speeds. 2005; 4(1): 37–45.

Patent Act 1970, s 3 (m).

Copyright Act 1957, s 13.

Trademark Act 1999, s 29 (4).

Diamond v. Chakrabarty [1980] 447 U.S. 303.

Inner Studies v. Charlotte Anderson [2014] (57) PTC 228 (Del).

Bernard Steiner. Trade Secrets. [1905] TYLJ 374.

SK Verma. Legal protection of trade secrets and confidential information. [2002] JILI 336.

Yeong-Shyang Chen. Social networking practices of Viennese coffeehouse culture and intangible heritage tourism. [2017] JTCC 194.

Designs Act 2000, s 2 (d).

Designs Act 2000, s 5.

Aswathy Sujith. Sports and intellectual property rights: An overview on the Indian standards. JLSR. 2016; 58–65.

Ayushi Kar. Explained: IPL media rights and the league’s global standing. Businessline. 15 June 2010.

Copyrights Act 1957, s 37.

Trademarks Act 1999, s 2 (b).

Pariksha Parmar. Sports events and their protection under IPR. SSRNEJ. 2010. [Online] Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1724624.

New Balance Athletics v Ashok Kumar Trading [2022] SCC Online Del 2578.

Copyrights Act 1957, s 14.

Bcci.tv. (2023) Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI). About copyrights. [Online] Available from: https://www.bcci.tv/about/Copyright.

Samir Kasal v. Prashant Mehra and Ors [2022] SCC Online Del 184.

Rajesh J, Sivakumar, Ramanjaneyulu. A critical study on Indian Premier League (IPL) and its marketing implication to overcome the challenges of controversy, clutter and significance beyond cricket. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal. 2020; 24(4): 1–9.

Jayanta Oinam. (Outlook, 15 May, 2022). IPL 2019 matches fixed? CBI books seven allegedly corrupt Indians with Pakistani links. [Online] Available from: https://www.outlookindia.com/sports/ipl-2022-match-fixing-racket-allegedly-influenced-outcome-cbi-arrests-three-people-news-196716.

starteazytm (2022). Passing off and infringement of trademark. TaxGuru. [Online] Available at: https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/passing-infringement-trademark.html.

Manvee. (2022). Issues pertaining to broadcasting in the Indian Premier League: A way forward. (Centre for Business and Commercial Laws NLIU Bhopal). [Online] Available from: https://cbcl.nliu.ac.in/contemporary-issues/issues-pertaining-to-broadcasting-in-indian-premier-league-a-way-forward/.

Published

2024-01-22