Is Personality a Subject Matter of Intellectual Property as a Trademark? A Legal Discourse

Authors

  • Akash Chatterjee

Keywords:

Personality, Trademark, Reputation, goodwill, Protection, Appropriation

Abstract

The Trademarks Act has been a formal way of recognising the distinctive marks used by a person during any business operations or commercial enterprises to safeguard the identity they have built. It is important for proprietors to create a brand for their business that can be identified, referred to, and used to expand their goodwill. Traditionally, a trademark refers to marks, logos, and symbols used as a sign to identify with a brand or commercial activity it represents. This goes a long way in creating long-lasting impressions in the minds of consumers who might prefer or choose a particular brand. In light of this ideology, a ‘personality’ or the existence of a particular person with his unique set of attributes, skills, mannerisms, features, and qualities should also be a subject matter of trademark. We come across advertisements that have gone a long way in using these personalities and their attributes to secure a good brand name, reputation, and commercial gains too. Although this
represents monetary value in vesting traits of a particular personality, that is also an intellectual property of the person and demands protection. The paper will explore recent examples where a person’s unique traits have attracted his association with the brand, thereby helping in advertising the product with the person’s goodwill. Postures, voice, and mannerisms all go a long way in helping people remember a particular person, distinctly more so when there is an element of reputational goodwill. Any usage of the same must be warranted or allowed by the person, or else it is unfair, and an invasion of privacy too. This paper will analyze how personality is a product of intellect and deserves protection as intellectual property. A doctrinal analysis of the case laws and controversies
will help the author formulate and devise how personalities can be given protection like trademarks.

References

Philip S Holzman. Personality. Encyclopaedia Britannica. (June 2013). [Online] Available at: https://www.britannica.com/topic/personality.

Rahul Chaudhury. Trademark protection of signature poses and voices of celebrities in India: An uncharted territory. Asia Law. (June 2023). [Online] Available from: https://www.asialaw.com /NewsAndAnalysis/trademark-protection-of-signature-poses-and-voices-of-celebrities-in-india-an-un/Index/1719.

EU Application nos. 009787573 (class 18) and 008669236(classes 09, 14, 16, 25, and 28).

EU Application no. 016271975 (classes 25 and 43).

US Application no. 4135718 (class 25).

Barton Beebe. The semiotic analysis of trademark law. UCLAL REV. 2003; 51: 1–14.

J Thomas Mccarthy. Rights of Publicity and Privacy. Volume 4. 2nd edition. 2018. p. 41.

Clarisa Long. Dilution. Columbia Law Review. 2006; 106(5): 1029–1078.

Beebe B. What trademark law is learning from the right of publicity. Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts. 2019; 42: 389.

Agnes Augustian. Protection of personality rights in India: Issues and challenges. IPR Journal. June 2023; 1(1): 44–53. [Online] Available https://www.nlunagpur.ac.in/PDF/Publications/5-Current-Issue/4.%20protection%20 of%20personality%20rights%20IN%20india.pdf.

Joshi K, Pareek V. Character merchandising: Right of publicity and its relation with trademark laws. Specialusis Ugdymas. Sep 2022; 1(43): 8369–8385.

Tabrez Ahmad, Satya Ranjan Swain. Celebrity rights: Protection under IP Laws. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights. Jan 2011; 16: 7–16. [Online] Available from: https://docs.manupatra.in/newsline/articles/Upload/78DD5FE8-5C07-4075-934D-6917CD6BE8 68.pdf.

Rule 26(5) of the Trademark Rules, 2017.

(2015) (62) PTC 351 (Mad).

(2012) (50) PTC 486 (Del).

2003 VIIAD 405 (Delhi).

202 f.2d 866 (2d Cir. 1953).

849 F. 2d 460 (9th Cir. 1988).

978 F 2d 1093 (9th Cir. 1992).

737 F Supp. 826 (S.D.N.Y.).

Sakshi Goel, Navita Rohilla. The legal and judicial framework of publicity rights and IPR. Jus Corpus Law Journal. Dec 2022; 3: 512. [Online] Available from: https://www.juscorpus. com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/101.-Sakshi-Goel.pdf.

Susan H Abramovitch. Misappropriation of personality. Canadian Business Law Journal. 2000; 33: 230–246.

2011 (47) PTC 1 (Del).

Id.

CS (COMM) 819 of 2022.

2002 SCC Online Bom 942.

2021 SCC Online Del 3146.

EU Application no. 018804962 (classes 3, 5, 16 and 21).

Stacey Dogan. What the right of publicity can learn from trademark law. Stanford Law Review. 2006; 58: 1161. [Online] Available from: https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_ scholarship/420.

Beverley H Smith. The commercial appropriation of personality. Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002. [Online] Available from: 10.1017/CBO9780511495229. pp. 33–36.

Published

2023-12-28